Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

قراء تراث ابن القيم

@Qa_Rea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22,178subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002343950239
TypeChannel
Username@Qa_Rea
Descriptionقناة مختصة بقراءة تراث ابن القيم رحمه الله تعالى
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Qa_Rea

Growth

22,15122,17822,164.56 August 2026 — 22,151 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,162 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,168 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,172 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,178 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 7 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,147–22,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:1822,178+6
11 Aug 2026, 23:5622,172+4
10 Aug 2026, 00:5222,168+6
7 Aug 2026, 23:5822,162+7
7 Aug 2026, 00:0822,155+4
6 Aug 2026, 13:3322,151first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.25%
avg views ÷ 22,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held55 (2 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total64,083
Reactions total538
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
647
Videos
2
Links
348

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

538 reactions across 55 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33862.8%
💯499.11%
❤‍🔥458.36%
👍325.95%
🥰173.16%
🤔112.04%
🕊101.86%
💘81.49%
😢71.30%
61.12%
🤝50.929%
😘30.558%
20.372%
🔥20.372%
😍20.372%
🤨10.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 538reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC609 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

19 ورد اليوم التاسع عشر 22-2.pdf

🥰2👍1💯1

12 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC619 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️68%
  2. ⏳️37%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍2💯1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC624 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‏🚦بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 🔹(اليوم ١٩)🔹 📕 الكتاب: زاد المعاد في هدي خير العباد ⬅️ المقدار: إلى: (وذكر البيهقي في «الشُّعب» عن علقمة بن قيس قال: رُحت مع) ص٥٠٦. 🗓 الخميس 💻 رابط الكتاب https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zl9Ew5pP6RNVz85Wng3XCTVVwBAuFw1R/view?usp=drivesdk

💯2🥰2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC976 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ورسول الله - ﷺ - سيد الأنام، ويوم الجمعة سيد الأيام، فللصلاة عليه في هذا اليوم مزية ليست لغيره، مع حكمة أخرى وهي أن كل خير نالته أمته في الدنيا والآخرة فإنما نالته على يده، فجمع الله لأمته به بين خير الدنيا والآخرة. وأعظم كرامة تحصل لهم فإنها تحصل يوم الجمعة، فإن فيه بعثهم إلى منازلهم وقصورهم في الجنة، وهو يوم المزيد لهم إذا دخلوا الجنة. وهو عيد لهم في الدنيا، ويوم فيه يسعفهم الله تعالى بطلباتهم وحوائجهم، ولا يرد سائ

11

11 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC945 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وكان من هديه - ﷺ - تعظيم هذا اليوم [يوم الجمعة]، وتشريفه، وتخصيصه بعبادات يختص بها عن غيره. #زاد_المعاد

6😘3🤨1

11 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC918 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وخطب رسول الله - ﷺ - مرة أخرى، فقال: «إن الحمد لله، أحمده وأستعينه. نعوذ بالله من شرور أنفسنا ومن سيئات أعمالنا. من يهده الله فلا مضل له، ومن يضلل فلا هادي له. وأشهد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له. إن أحسن الحديث كتاب الله. قد أفلح من زينه الله في قلبه وأدخله في الإسلام بعد الكفر، فاختاره على ما سواه من أحاديث الناس. إنه أحسن الحديث وأبلغه. أحبوا ما أحب الله. أحبوا الله من كل قلوبكم. ولا تملوا كلام الله وذكره، ول

3❤‍🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC761 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وكانت أول خطبة خطبها رسول الله - ﷺ - فيما بلغني عن أبي سلمة بن عبد الرحمن ــ ونعوذ بالله أن نقول على رسول الله - ﷺ - ما لم يقل ــ أنه قام فيهم، فحمد الله وأثنى عليه بما هو أهله، ثم قال: «أما بعد، أيها الناس، فقدموا لأنفسكم. تعلمن: والله ليصعقن أحدكم، ثم ليدعن غنمه ليس لها راع، ثم ليقولن له ربه، ليس له ترجمان ولا حاجب يحجبه دونه: ألم يأتك رسولي فبلغك، وآتيتك مالا، وأفضلت عليك؟ فما قدمت لنفسك؟ فلينظرن يمينا وشمالا، فلا

3❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC700 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ثم قدم رسول الله - ﷺ - المدينة، فأقام بقباء في بني عمرو بن عوف ــ كما قال ابن إسحاق ــ يوم الاثنين ويوم الثلاثاء ويوم الأربعاء ويوم الخميس، وأسس مسجدهم. ثم خرج يوم الجمعة، فأدركته الجمعة في بني سالم بن عوف، فصلاها في المسجد الذي في بطن الوادي، وكانت أول جمعة صلاها بالمدينة، وذلك قبل تأسيس مسجده. #زاد_المعاد

4❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC772 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️90%
  2. ⏳️13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💯2❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC796 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‏🚦بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 🔹(اليوم ١٨)🔹 📕 الكتاب: زاد المعاد في هدي خير العباد ⬅️ المقدار: إلى: (وأرجح هذه الأقوال: قولان تضمَّنتهما الأحاديث الثابتة، وأحدهما أرجح من الآخر) ص٤٨١. 🗓 الأربعاء 💻 رابط الكتاب https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zl9Ew5pP6RNVz85Wng3XCTVVwBAuFw1R/view?usp=drivesdk

🕊2💯1

10 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,070 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وكان من هديه - ﷺ - وهدي أصحابه: سجود الشكر عند تجدد نعمة تسر واندفاع نقمة. #زاد_المعاد

22❤‍🔥3🕊32👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Qa_Rea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Qa_Rea edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️68%
  2. ⏳️37%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️90%
  2. ⏳️13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️89%
  2. ⏳️19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️86%
  2. ⏳️14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️96%
  2. ⏳️8%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

ضع ✅️ في حال الإنجاز

  1. ✅️94%
  2. ⏳️8%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 81,743 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قراء تراث ابن القيم” (@Qa_Rea), 22,178 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qa_Rea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.