Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 52 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,998–22,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 12:01
22,228
+181
17 Sept 2026, 19:20
22,047
+19
15 Sept 2026, 16:19
22,028
-14
14 Sept 2026, 02:21
22,042
-8
12 Sept 2026, 09:39
22,050
-1
10 Sept 2026, 05:18
22,051
-36
6 Sept 2026, 23:41
22,087
-16
4 Sept 2026, 11:41
22,103
-2
3 Sept 2026, 00:55
22,105
-15
1 Sept 2026, 22:47
22,120
-14
1 Sept 2026, 02:18
22,134
-7
31 Aug 2026, 00:36
22,141
-7
29 Aug 2026, 21:04
22,148
-2
28 Aug 2026, 20:12
22,150
-4
27 Aug 2026, 20:54
22,154
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:44
22,151
-6
24 Aug 2026, 19:57
22,157
-14
23 Aug 2026, 04:03
22,171
+2
21 Aug 2026, 15:18
22,169
-7
20 Aug 2026, 10:39
22,176
first reading
Engagement
189 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.78%
avg views ÷ 22,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.768%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 189 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
189 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
41,419
Reactions total
318
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 04:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
667
Videos
2
Links
381
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,641 reactions across 189 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
959
58.4%
👍
202
12.3%
💯
139
8.47%
❤🔥
100
6.09%
🥰
63
3.84%
🕊
62
3.78%
🔥
32
1.95%
🤯
14
0.853%
✍
11
0.67%
🤔
11
0.67%
💘
9
0.548%
😢
9
0.548%
🎉
7
0.427%
💔
6
0.366%
🤝
5
0.305%
😍
4
0.244%
😘
3
0.183%
⚡
2
0.122%
😭
2
0.122%
🤨
1
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 189 of the 189 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وكانت تَقْدَم عليه رسلُ أعدائه وهم على عداوته فلا يهيجهم ولا يقتلهم. ولما قدم عليه رسولا مسيلمةَ الكذاب ــ وهما: عبد الله بن النواحة، وابن أثال ــ قال لهما: «فما تقولان أنتما؟» قالا: نقول كما قال، فقال رسول الله ﷺ: «واللهِ لولا أن الرسل لا تُقتل لضربتُ أعناقكما»، فجرت سنته أن لا يُقتل رسول.
#زاد_المعاد
كان هديه أنه إذا صالح قومًا، فنقض بعضُهم عهدَه وصُلْحَه، وأقرهم الباقون ورَضُوا به غزا الجميعَ وجعلهم كلَّهم ناقضين، كما فعل بقريظة والنضير وبني قينقاع، وكما فعل بأهل مكة.
#زاد_المعاد
لمّا قدم النبيُّ ﷺ المدينة صار الكفار معه ثلاثة أقسام:
- قسم صالحهم ووادعهم على أن لا يحاربوه، ولا يظاهروا عليه، ولا يُمالِئُوا عليه عدوَّه، وهم على كفرهم آمنون على دمائهم وأموالهم.
- وقسم حاربوه ونصبوا له العداوة.
- وقسم تارَكوه فلم يُصالِحوه ولم يحاربوه، بل انتظروا ما يؤول إليه أمرُه وأمرُ أعدائه. ثم مِن هؤلاء من كان يحب ظهورَه وانتصاره في الباطن، ومنهم: من كان يحب ظهور عدوِّه عليه وانتصارَهم، ومنهم: من دخل معه في …
🚦بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
🔹(اليوم ٥١)🔹
📕 الكتاب: زاد المعاد في هدي خير العباد
⬅️ المقدار: إلى: (فصل: وصالح قريشا على وضع الحرب) ص165.
🗓 الاثنين
💻 رابط الكتاب
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L34fsYS-HCXSbzKDPwflEv5u5LEJOVSG/view?usp=drivesdk
أتممت بحمد الله وفضله جمع غريب القرآن من مؤلفات ابن القيم رحمه الله تعالى مرتبا على سور القرآن العظيم، ولا يخلو هذا الجمع من فوائد وتحريرات لبعض المفردات، فالله أسأل أن يجعله من العلم الذي يُنتفع به، والحمد لله الذي بنعمته تتم الصالحات.
وكان هديه أنَّ من أسلم على شيءٍ في يده فهو له، ولم ينظر إلى سببه قبل الإسلام بل يُقرُّه في يده كما كان قبل الإسلام، ولم يكن يُضمِّن المشركين إذا أسلموا ما أتلفوه على المسلمين من نفس أو مالٍ حالَ الحرب ولا قبله.
#زاد_المعاد
كان ﷺ يبايع أصحابه في الحرب على أن لا يفرُّوا، وربما بايعهم على الموت، وبايعهم على الجهاد، كما بايعهم على الإسلام، وبايعهم على الهجرة قبل الفتح، وبايعهم على التوحيد والتزام طاعة الله ورسوله.
وبايع نفرًا من أصحابه أن لا يسألوا الناس شيئًا، فكان السوط يسقط من يد أحدهم فينزل يأخذه ولا يقول لأحد: ناولني إياه.
#زاد_المعاد
❤8👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @Qa_Rea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Qa_Rea edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 27 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قراء تراث ابن القيم” (@Qa_Rea), 22,228 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qa_Rea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.