Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

پراجکت لئون.اخبار جنگ،ترامپ،رژیم،در لحظه!هرشب آپدیت صوتی!

@ProjectLeon7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

50,261subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001606628308
TypeChannel
Username@ProjectLeon7
Descriptionتماس با روابط عمومی،ایمیل ارتباط رسمی: project.leon.official@projectleon.net
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProjectLeon7

Growth

50,17350,30950,2417 August 2026 — 50,307 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,307 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,303 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,233 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,173 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,308 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,309 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,261 subscribers50,2617 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,153–50,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:3350,261-48
12 Aug 2026, 00:2250,309+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:5450,308+135
10 Aug 2026, 04:4050,173-60
9 Aug 2026, 07:1150,233-27
8 Aug 2026, 05:0250,260-43
7 Aug 2026, 05:1850,303-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:0050,307no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:4850,307first reading

Engagement

200 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 50,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,860
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
200
of 200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held200 (6 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,290,068
Reactions total45,870
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,170
Videos
7,330
Links
944

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 83 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45,870 reactions across 188 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17,34437.8%
❤‍🔥9,75021.3%
🤣8,86519.3%
🔥5,54112.1%
😁2,4355.31%
🫡1,9354.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 188 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,870reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 188 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProjectLeon7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 200 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTCviews —

پراجکت لئون.اخبار جنگ،ترامپ،رژیم،در لحظه!هرشب آپدیت صوتی! pinned an audio file

13 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,730 views85 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

📌سخنان پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ امریکادرباره موفقیت دولت کینگ ترامپ در مبارزه با قاچاق مواد مخدر : «نتایج تاریخی هستند.اکنون در ایالات متحده، مرگ‌ومیر ناشی از اوردوز مواد مخدر به شدت کاهش یافته است. ورود و جریان فنتانیل بسیار پایین آمده است. عبور غیرقانونی از مرزهای جنوب غربی ما به صفر رسیده است. نرخ قتل در شهرهای امریکا در پایین‌ترین حد مدرن و بی‌سابقه خود قرار دارد و شاهد کاهش تاریخی در میزان جرایم هستیم.» هُرمَزدشید ۲

👍74❤‍🔥8🔥2🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈9,700 views390 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

آپدیت ۲۲ اَمُرداد/از دقیقه 08:30 ♦️فقط چهار روز. ♦️ترامپ،حلقه محاصره تنگ تر می‌شود. ♦️رژیم،جنگ در آستانه پاییز. ♦️شکست هرگونه مذاکره. ♦️اخبار. هُرمَزدشید ۲۲ اَمُرداد #پراجکت_لئون #ما_شاه_میخواهیم #جاویدشاه

❤‍🔥290👍61🫡25🔥9🤣5

12 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈11,100 views392 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📌هم اکنون، خورشید گرفتگی کامل در ایسلند! تیر‌شید ۲۱ اَمُرداد #پراجکت_لئون #ما_شاه_میخواهیم #جاویدشاه

❤‍🔥320👍35🔥32🫡4🤣1

12 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈9,970 views459 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

کینگ بی بی نتانیاهو؛ «بیگ‌یاهو بودن یه جورایی شیکه.» «خدمت کردن در ارتش اسرائیل (IDF) یه جورایی شیکه.» «متوقف کردن جمهوری اسلامی یه جورایی شیکه.» تیر‌شید ۲۱ اَمُرداد #پراجکت_لئون #ما_شاه_میخواهیم #جاویدشاه

🔥293🫡80👍51❤‍🔥33🤣2

12 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈8,900 views246 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📌هم اکنون، ساعت 21:50 به گاه ایران؛ گزارشها از شلیک موشک از سیریک به سمت تنگه هرمز!!! تیر‌شید ۲۱ اَمُرداد #پراجکت_لئون #ما_شاه_میخواهیم #جاویدشاه

🤣173🔥42👍20❤‍🔥6😁3🫡2

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈8,650 views197 reactionsread 13 August 2026

📌ئسرائیل کاتز در ادامه می فرمایند: نه در لبنان، نه در سوریه و نه در غزه در مناطق امنیتی، درس ۷ اکتبر این است که ما با حضور ارتش اسرائیل در این مکان‌ها و محافظت از آن‌ها در برابر یورش‌ها، تیراندازی‌ها و سایر موارد، از ساکنان محافظت می‌کنیم. این سیاست ماست، این دیدگاه ماست. ​قلعه بوفور بیش از هر چیز معنی این سیاست را نشان می‌دهد: ما بالا هستیم و آن‌ها پایین. ساکنان محافظت می‌شوند، ارتش اسرائیل در داخل است و ۲۰۰ هزار س

👍158🫡26❤‍🔥11🤣2

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈8,040 views188 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

📌ئسرائیل کاتز: «ما اینجا رشته‌کوه‌های بوفور را می‌بینیم. پس از اینکه تونل‌های آنجا نابود شدند، ارتش اسرائیل (تزاهال) در اینجا یک مانور انجام داد. شما مسیر لیطانی را در یک عملیات مقتدرانه و با مهارت نادر می‌بینید؛ با شکست سازمان تروریستی حزب‌الله و تصرف بوفور که از المتوله و شهرک‌های شمال محافظت می‌کند. سربازان ارتش اسرائیل بر تمام مواضع سازمان تروریستی حزب‌الله در افق، مشرف و تهدیدکننده هستند. ​ما، همان‌طور که کینگ ب

👍141❤‍🔥27🫡16🤣3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈7,760 views207 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

📌مایک هاگبی، نماینده امریکا در اسرائیل: این اقدام درستی است که با وارد کردن فشار اقتصادی واقعی روی آنها انجام می‌شود. کینگ دانلد ترامپ، نه تنها نشان داده که تمایل دارد آن‌ها را بمباران کند، بلکه تمایل دارد آن‌ها را از نظر اقتصادی ورشکسته کند.اگر این دو موضوع را کنار هم بگذاريد خسارتی که به توان نظامی آن‌ها وارد شد فاجعه‌بار بود، مهم نیست آن‌ها چه می‌گویند. عملیات مشترک بین ایالات متحده و اسرائیل حجم فوق‌العاده‌ای از

❤‍🔥138👍62🤣7

12 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈6,960 views154 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

📌بوریس جانسون: ​«اون‌ها گفتند سفر من به کی‌یف در ماه اپریل اون سال باعث متوقف شدن مذاکرات صلح شد. می‌گن من بازی رو خراب کردم و کاری کردم که دستیابی به توافق صلح غیرممکن بشه. این حرف کاملاً و مطلقاً مزخرفه! ​منظورم اینه که هیچ رهبر اروپایی یا غربی اصلاً نمی‌تونست اوکراینی‌ها رو از جنگیدن برای کشورشون باز بداره. چنین چیزی اصلاً قرار نبود اتفاق بیفته. ​تمام چیزی که من به اون‌ها می‌گفتم، تمام چیزی که می‌خواستم به ولودیم

👍136🤣18

Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @ProjectLeon7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 663,024 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Farzad Zarrin - TV
@farzadzarrin · 207,296
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Reza Pahlavi | رضا پهلوی
@OfficialRezaPahlavi · 345,647
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
ملی‌ گرایان مردم‌ گرا
@Mellig · 166,021
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
DorrTV شبکه جهانی دُرّ تی وی
@dorrtv · 613,124
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پراجکت لئون.اخبار جنگ،ترامپ،رژیم،در لحظه!هرشب آپدیت صوتی!” (@ProjectLeon7), 50,261 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProjectLeon7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.