4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,319–1,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:22
1,321
-4
9 Aug 2026, 07:51
1,325
-7
6 Aug 2026, 12:47
1,332
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:38
1,332
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 1,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
14 (5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,709
Reactions total
75
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
37
49.3%
👍
23
30.7%
👌
8
10.7%
❤
5
6.67%
😢
2
2.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این اسکرینشات دو نکته مهم داره؛
۱-تایید اینکه کشتار دی "قتلعام و جنایت سازمانیافته و برنامهریزی شده بوده", اما نکته مهم؛
آیا نهادهای امنیتی تحت نام ریزشیها و گاردجاویدان نفوذ کردند و با دادن ضد اطلاعات به تیم برای غافلگیر کردن, به میدان کشیدن و کشتار بچه های ما فعال بودند؟
1
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
📲 @twittervid_bot
چطور حتی یک ریزشی از ۱۵۰هزارتا به اینها هشدار نداده بوده که برنامه ریزی قتلعام انجام شده؟ آیا این عقبگرد تیم نوفدی و پس گرفتن ادعای ارتباط با داخل و ابراز اینکه فقط از طریق اینستاگرام بوده و خود را به کوچه علی چپ زدن برای لاپوشانی این رسوایی فریب اطلاعاتی و غافلگیری بوده؟
2
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
📲 @twittervid_bot
اگر آری کل تیم و خود شاهزاده بصورت کامل فریب نهادهای امنیتی را از طریق نفوذ ریزشی ها و گارد جاویدان خورده اند و مسولیت این شکست و سهل انگاری! هستند.
و ادامه آنکه این اثبات میکند که کسانی مثل باند آریو و آدم دوزاری شاسگول گاماسیاب و... که شب اول بشدت بر روی اخبار کشتار لاپوشانی
3
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
📲 @twittervid_bot
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
میکردند و میگفتند کشتار دروغ هست عامل نفوذی مستقیم ج.ا بوده اند.
(قبلا اثبات شده آریو همکار اکانت امنیتی ژوپیتر بوده)
4
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 Savak archive (@Savak_archive0)
نمونه اول آریو:
با دومین اکانتش از اعضا فعال تیم واژ و حامیان اصلی ژوپیتر بود که در اکثر اسپیس های تیم واژ و ژوپیتر به عنوان سخنگو و اسپیکر شرکت میکرد. ابتدا حامی علینژاد بود و از فعالین اسپیس های سایبری معروف پوآرو بود.
نمونه…
نکته مهم دوم؛
کربلایی شایان اعتراف میکند از این خیانت و برنامه ریزی برای کشتار آگاه بوده اما خودش را سانسور کرده! این سوتی اعتراف ناخواسته به خیانتو همدستی در کشتار بچه های ما بوده.
سکوت کرده بوده مبادا پولی که بابت پستها بهش میدهند را قطع کنند. اگر اعلام میکرد برنامه ریزی
5
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
📲 @twittervid_bot
کشتار وجود دارد شاید خیلی از جانها نجات پیدا میکرد!
خون خیلی بچه های ما روی دستان تیم نوفدی و این سایبریهای نوفدی و نفوذیهای امنیتی هست.
6
🔗 HUNTER (@hunter_of57s)
📲 @twittervid_bot
گاهی اوقات ما قاطعیت را با لجبازی اشتباه میگیریم!
*شخصا بعنوان یک نظامی بارها هشدار کشتار را دادم و براش هشتگ #قیامت_مصنوعی درست کردم و گفتم هدف فراخوان دادن شاه هست ولی متاسفانه تیم وفادار بعنوان اخبار زیادی! اجازه شنیده شدن نداد!
یکی از کسانی بودم که در این سالها گافها را زیر فرش میکردم تا ظهور دفترچه که دیگه دیدم هیچ رقمه نمیشه رفوش کرد. از همان زمان وحشتم زیاد شد چون میدانستم تیم وفادار با عارف از طرف اسهال طلبان بسته
هنوز تهدلم امید به بیداری و بازگشت به اصل وجودیاش که همان فلسفه پادشاهی هست، دارم
واقعا عجایب هشتگانه هست!
ارازل و اوباش به ارازل و اوباش میگن ارازل و اوباش
مزدور به مزدور میگه مزدور
نفوذی به نفوذی میگه نفوذی
سعید مزدور به سعیدهای دیگه میگه مزدور و نفوذی
خدایی اگر عجایب هشتگانه نیست پس چیه؟!
https://t.me/KhiresarMotamared/9709
کاش میتونستم از خیانتهای ارتشبد بیژن کیان خبيث حرف بزنم...
پ.ن: میدونم دارم گاف امنیتی میدم ولی باداباد چون باید اینا افشا بشن. از نوفدی کوفتی بگیر تا امیر دله و سعید و بیژن کیان و.. همه باید افشا و مهمتر محاکمه بشن
https://t.me/KhiresarMotamared/10529
https://t.me/KhiresarMotamared/10805
https://t.me/KhiresarMotamared/10808
سعید جان
برای این به شما میگویند رویافروشی میکنید
-چون خود شما نهایت فداکاری بزرگی که برای این رویای بزرگ و موفقیت بزرگ میکنید این است که «سریال خوشساخت» ببینید یا کتاب بیکیفیت بخوانید
یا بعد از دیدن فیلم تیر خوردن چنددههزار ایرانی آخآخ بگویید، اگر بگویید
-چون سایتی ساختید که به صورت خطی آمارش بالا میرفت و بعد مجبور شدید آن را بدون هیچ توضیحی تعطیل کنید
-چون با اکسل 160000 ریزشی را ریزاندید اما مدتی است هر…
با این توضیح، به جرات بزرگترین خطایی که در این یکسال مرتکب شدید حمله به قانون مشروطه بود؛ اینکه افرادی دارای ارزشهای مشترک با ج.ا جلوی چشم شما مهمترین سند حقوقی شما و ایران را که ستون فقرات قانونگذاری در یکصدسال گذشته بوده است، توانستند تصاحب کنند، یک خطا از جانب شما بود.
از طرفی اسلام زدایی از این سند ارزشمند تاریخی که ضامن نظام پادشاهی ایران بوده و هست کار دشواری نبود و نیست(از موضع بنده نسبت به اسلام احتمالا م…
👏3❤1
Signed علی محمدیان
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @KhiresarMotamared. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 589,878 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@KhiresarMotamared named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hunter_of57s named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@mehdihajati named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@pahlavireza named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@savak_archive0 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خیرهسر متمرد” (@KhiresarMotamared), 1,321 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KhiresarMotamared.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.