Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кастрище🔥

@ProectKaSter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002770777893
TypeChannel
Username@ProectKaSter
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ProectKaSter

Growth

6611 Aug 2026, 10:53 — 66 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:01 — 66 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:5311 Aug 2026, 11:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:0166no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:5366first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
114.0%
avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total301
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
71
Videos
1
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1745.9%
👏513.5%
🔥513.5%
🥰513.5%
😁25.41%
🤔25.41%
👍12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC67 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

На рейсе в Минск и Таллин Среди старых поездов-развалин. Чуть пригубив на вокзале Лето идёт, чередом и парадом. Началась триумфальная арка.

3 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @litslembelPhoto

Андрей Субботин — победитель Битвы Чемпионов сезона 2025-2026. Право представлять Белгород на Всероссийском слэме, 12 000₽ рублей и сертификат на бесплатную татуировку от спонсора в кармане. Уверенная, чистая победа, построенная на сильных текстах, харизме и взаимной любви к участникам и зрителю, который ответил признанием в финале. Второе место у Дениса Федосенко, недодавшего от волнения экспромт. Зато увесистый па

1

3 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026

оааоАаавцапооаоаоаоааоа Мой любимый поэт Белгородского слэма (да и не только) все же победил.

26 Jul 2026, 23:11 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

На меня написали действительно неплохо написанный дисс, возможно напишу ребзям, на бит положим😁: чтобы вынести тебя не нужно многого щас буду кенселить тебе как галя из продуктового ты ущемленнышь, девушек называешь "бабами" и "телками" походу так хотел "сунуть в защелку", но получал только за щеку какое ты кастрище, ты это если бы есенин на зажигалку пернул или если бы маяковский пернул, читателю в еблище чтобы бы

1🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

КОНВЕНЦИЯ Конвенции бывают разные, Белые, синие, красные. В Женеве и Гааге, и как и всегда Мы все проебали! В Брюсселе, Петербурге, Москве. Собирается слёт в честь Коллантай Этот слёт удивительно однороден И по половому признаку - одинаков. Прилетают модели и сельские бабы Со всех уголков, нашей, необъятной Из Италии, Франции, Перу Решают кому же кому! Вынести приговор, сто лет одиночества И рассылают письма, обр

2🥰1

1 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вот мне прям нравится как выбирается место для Белгородских слэмов, когда Мануфактура клинит. 100 вариантов и не одного блядушника. Не порядок.

👏5

22 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC168 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Если рвется под кожей зверь, значит все для него теперь ©mujuice "Юность" ЮНЕСКО дал отметку "Мировое наследие" Твоим нюдсам В переписке В интернете, ТГ, Инсте, витражы Где матюки, убийства И твои голые сиськи. На обозрение миллионов зевак Таймс сквер заполнен, Эротикой, на которой Нет авторских прав Ну все узнают на фотках Тебя! Твой начальник Здоровается не смотря в глаза, Твое лицо забыли так же, Как и забыл

6

10 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTC139 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @svetly_melancholicFile

Сегодня ровно год с того момента, когда я впервые пришёл на вечер Первых Зумерских Чтений. Он проходил в баре "Фогель" на Фонтанке. После были вечера в Лето Руме, да и ещё много где. Было много разнообразных эмоций и впечатлений. А самое главное, это было очень свежо и бодро. Так бодро, что всё это вылилось в команду на КБС и участие в командных слэмах. Впрочем это уже история. ПЗЧ в какой-то степени стали культовой

🔥3

30 May 2026, 19:09 UTC149 viewsread 11 August 2026

Все ещё в папке. Надо в честь этого что-то и написать...

30 May 2026, 19:09 UTC161 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @litslembelPhoto

Обновленная папка с каналами белгородских поэтов — участников литературных слэмов. Подписывайтесь сразу на всех или выбирайте тех, кто ближе по мысли, слову и эмоции. В каналах не только стихи, но и впечатления авторов о прошедших мероприятиях. Периодически будем обновлять.

3

24 May 2026, 12:35 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ес чё, никто мне ниче не писал. Аккаунты удаляются. Если спам продолжится. Буду чистить комментарии, спасибо.

👍1

22 May 2026, 16:37 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Там в комментах чисто отсылка на КБС. Опять возня. Можно зайти в комменты, но не исключено что запутаетесь ещё сильнее

🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProectKaSter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,105,385 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кастрище🔥” (@ProectKaSter), 66 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProectKaSter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.