Channel
@Pro_CryptoAnalyst
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,102subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001914485153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pro_CryptoAnalyst |
| Description | None of our posts are financial advice. Its our observation and opinion. Do your own research. #CRYPTO #ANALYSIS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pro_CryptoAnalyst |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11,000 average views per post against 9,102 subscribers — an engagement rate of 121.3%. Across the 8,615 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,997 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.27% and 18.3%, with a median of 8.38%.
| Window | 30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 220,800 |
| Mature posts only | 121.6% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 9,102 measured 20 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:eng · 8,615 channels · p10 1.04% · p25 3.27% · p50 8.38% · p75 18.3% · p90 32.8% |
| Position in cohort | 99.570th percentile · 14.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.067% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 9,102 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 9,113 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (12 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 273,990 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
#BTC Update: #BTC gave a clean break of the #Resistance area followed by a successful retest — bullish structure now firmly intact 📈🟢💪. Price still shooting higher with the next key area sitting at the $82,000 mark 🔴. Currently sitting at minor #Resistance which could trigger a small rejection before continuation — watch closely for how price reacts here as a clean push through would open the path directly toward $…
#BTC ETF Flow Update: #SpotETF flows turned positive mid-July before flipping straight back negative within the same week 📉🔴. Net flows modestly negative again — though barely registering compared to the heavy redemption waves of June and early July 💪. Institutional channel neither selling the market down nor buying it up — last week's flip lacked the persistence that mattered most. Institutional demand remains in …
#ATOM Update: #ATOM gave a clean break and retest of the #Resistance line, now setting up a solid trading range with 10.7% room to work with 📉🔴. Structure looking favorable with the retest holding well and price respecting key levels cleanly 💪. Drawn #Resistance area provides a clear and well-defined range to trade — take the setup accordingly with proper risk management and let the trade develop at its own pace fo…
#BTC Update: #BTC made a sharp and clean #Breakout of the major #Resistance area, immediately hitting the $70,000 mark with strong bullish momentum 📈🟢💪. Next key #Resistance area now sitting at $71,250–$71,450 as the immediate target 🔴. Price could retrace before hitting resistance or push directly into the zone — either way watch closely for how it reacts at $71,250–$71,450 as that reaction will determine the next…
https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/d72915ed7a60473b92f0818d959a227a
Exchange deposits and withdrawals thinning out together — both running at roughly the same modest pace, among the quietest combined flows of the past three years 📉🔴. Balances drifted higher off April trough but broadly flat since early July 💪. Pattern reads less like distribution or accumulation and more like pure disinterest — a classic signature of the quiet middle of a bear market. With so little moving on-chain,…
#BTC.D Update: #BTC.D still respecting the #Consolidation and shooting all the way up to the top of the range 📉🔴. Altcoins experienced a very short-term down move that lacked any real impact on the broader market 💪. If dominance faces a rejection from here, we can expect a significant 10%–30% jump across #Altcoins — this could be the catalyst the altcoin market has been waiting for, watch this level very closely as…
#BTC Update: #BTC tapped into the #Resistance zone again only to face another decent rejection — zone standing strong with sellers defending it aggressively 📉🔴. Price expected to reach the mid-way of the range once again following the rejection 💪. Notably on HTF an #InverseHeadAndShoulders pattern is forming — an early potential reversal indication worth watching very closely as it could signal a significant trend …
#GOLD Update: #GOLD gave a clean flip over #Resistance and is now heading for a retest of the broken level 📈🟢💪. Structure turning increasingly bullish with buyers showing clear intentions of defending this newly flipped support 🔴. Once price drops lower for the retest, switch to LTF for confirmation before taking #Buys — a clean rejection candle on lower timeframes would provide the ideal and safest entry point ⚡️🎯
#BTC Update: #BTC surged strongly at the NY open and is now nearly back at the #Resistance area with bullish momentum building 📈🟢💪. Price approaching this critical level once again with more conviction than previous attempts 🔴. Hoping for a clean break through this time to finally kickstart a sustained bullish market — a confirmed close above resistance would be a significant signal that the tide is turning and the…
#US30 Update: #US30 forming a small #WedgePattern with support sitting slightly lower — a negative break could send the index falling further 📉🔴. Structure remains uncertain with no clear directional bias emerging from either side at this stage 💪. However in case of a positive #Breakout, short-term #Buys look favorable targeting the #ATH as take profit — take the setup in whichever direction price breaks and manage…
#BTC Update: #BTC closed its weekly candle near the #Support area with nothing particularly clear emerging from the structure 📉🔴. This week expected to bring more of the same indecisive price action with little meaningful movement likely to occur 💪. A downtrend move can be expected from current levels — avoid forcing any long entries and stay patient as the market continues to grind lower without any strong catalys…
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Pro_CryptoAnalyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pro Crypto Analyst” (@Pro_CryptoAnalyst), 9,102 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pro_CryptoAnalyst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.