Channel
@PervayaPolozhitelnaya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002617033961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PervayaPolozhitelnaya |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PervayaPolozhitelnaya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 25 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 26 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
60 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 10.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 8.33% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Судя по появившимся на карточке проекта кримтребований комментариям разработчиков, правки по травматам мы всё-таки отбили. Большинство оставленных сообщений под проектом получили следующий ответ: Проектируемые нормы, касающиеся уточнения требований к конструкции ствола огнестрельного оружия ограниченного поражения (пункт 3 и подпункт 11.2), из текста проекта приказа исключены.
🔥2
https://t.me/kirill_sturmer кепка имба , за патчи отдельное спасибо)
🔥3❤1😎1
Как же четенько в 98 году снимали аниме, есть в этом вайб чего-то старого
👍4
Если коротко то это вот так. Новые травматы будут бесполезными, а старые вообще не будут соответствовать крим. требованиям и будут считаться незаконным оружием. Хотят внести изменения, согласно которым в стволе ОООП должно быть минимум два штифта, которые будет перекрывать 50% просвета ствола. Картинка идеально подходит
😢2👎1
Судя по последним новостям, если примут проект об изменении криминалистических требований то это ваще гг будет
Решил почистить ствол после стрельбы ,но я не нашел ершик свой, пришлось салфеткой и палочкой для суши чистить, хорошо что у меня нет штифтов в стволе
😍2🔥1
Ай яй яй, тем временем в FIRELINE проверку СБ я прошел)
❤3👍1
А че это у нас такое намечается тут ?
😍2
Короче , я любезно им отказал, уж слишком далеко они находятся, точнее добираться тяжело, я как-то летом туда ездил и единственное как удобно, это на машине , а если сломается, то придется с мужиками в автобусе потеть
❤2
Стрелковый клуб «Объект» на собес пригласил, интересно
😁3
Есть короче над чем работать, надо более мягче спуск прожимать, вынос тоже похолостить нужно. В целом на 10 метров не так что бы сильно разлет
❤2
2 раза стрелял на 5 метра, первый раз был более кучнее в 10-ку, но я забыл сфоткать 🫠
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @PervayaPolozhitelnaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PervayaPolozhitelnaya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первая положительная” (@PervayaPolozhitelnaya), 25 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PervayaPolozhitelnaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.