Channel
@PapiDon_coding
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
371subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002129818397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PapiDon_coding |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PapiDon_coding |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 371 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 370 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 373 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 373 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 18.6% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2025 to 1 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اتاق برنامه نویسی </> pinned «🎬 قسمت جدید از فصل سوم دوره هوش مصنوعی منتشر شد! این قسمت یه نقطهی عطفه! 🔥 اگه فکر میکنی مهندسی پرامپت نویسی فقط یعنی قشنگ نوشتن و جملهسازی، باید بگم نه رفیق… اصل ماجرا از یه جایی مثل Tokenization شروع میشه! بشدت دیدن این فصل رو پیشنهاد میکنم و از دستش…»
🎬 قسمت جدید از فصل سوم دوره هوش مصنوعی منتشر شد! این قسمت یه نقطهی عطفه! 🔥 اگه فکر میکنی مهندسی پرامپت نویسی فقط یعنی قشنگ نوشتن و جملهسازی، باید بگم نه رفیق… اصل ماجرا از یه جایی مثل Tokenization شروع میشه! بشدت دیدن این فصل رو پیشنهاد میکنم و از دستش نده ! واقعاً درک عمیق مدلهای زبانی و مسیر حرفهای شدن توی AI 📌 با سادهترین و شیرینترین توضیح ممکن، مفهوم Token برات جا میافته؛ طوری که بعدش بگی: «آهااا! با…
🔥2
Signed PapiDon
سلام رفقای عزیز 😊 امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه! با کمک این نظرسنجی میخوام بدونم بیشتر به چه موضوعاتی علاقه دارید، تا بتونم محتواهای کانال رو دقیقتر و مفیدتر براتون تنظیم کنم. ممنون میشم اگر توی رأی دادن شرکت کنید 🙌🫶
❤6
Signed PapiDon
اتاق برنامه نویسی </> pinned «دوست دارید توی کانال درباره کدام موضوعات مطالب بیشتری گذاشته بشه ؟»
دوست دارید توی کانال درباره کدام موضوعات مطالب بیشتری گذاشته بشه ؟
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤6
Signed PapiDon
🔥 ده نکته طلایی برای حرفهای شدن در React که واقعاً مسیرت رو عوض میکنن! ✅ حرفهای شدن در React فقط به معنای نوشتن کد نیست. یعنی اینکه مفاهیم پایهای رو عمیق بفهمی، بهترین روشها رو یاد بگیری، و بتونی در هر پروژهای، بهترین و بهینهترین راهحل رو اجرا کنی. 📦 در واقع React یکی از قویترین و سریعترین کتابخانههای جاوااسکریپته برای ساخت رابطهای کاربری (UI) واکنشگرا و مقیاسپذیر. اما مثل هر ابزار قدرتمند دیگهای، اس…
❤3🔥1
Signed PapiDon
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed PapiDon
✨سه محیط اصلی در فرآیند CI/CD ⚙️ اول از همه: ENV یعنی چی؟ یعنی Environment، یعنی یک محیط مجزا برای اجرای برنامهت. ما توی CI/CD چندتا محیط داریم که برنامهمون به ترتیب توشون تست و اجرا میشه تا آماده بشه برای استفاده واقعی توسط کاربرا. ✅ معمولاً سه محیط اصلی داریم: 1️⃣ Development / Test (توسعه / تست) 📍 معمولاً اسم برنچ: develop یا test 🔧 اینجا برنامهنویسا کدنویسی میکنن، تست اولیه انجام میدن. 👨💻 همه چیز هنوز …
👍2
Signed PapiDon
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed PapiDon
✨ درباره Codex اینکه چیه و دقیقا چه کاری انجام میدهد ؟ یک cloud-based software engineering agent هست، یعنی یک دستیار برنامهنویس که روی فضای ابری کار میکنه. این ابزار توسط OpenAI ساخته شده و مدل قدرتمند codex-1 پشت اون قرار داره. کاری که Codex انجام میده اینه: - میتونه چند تا task (وظیفه برنامهنویسی) رو همزمان انجام بده - به جای اینکه فقط به یه سؤال ساده جواب بده، میتونه یک ویژگی جدید تو کدت بسازه، باگها…
🔥2❤1
Signed PapiDon
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed PapiDon
حالا کاری نداریم اینجا لایک نمیکنید ولی کلی سیو خورده مطلب حداقل واسه انگیزه هم شده ویدیو رو در کانال یوتیوب ولی لایک کنید 😊 واقعا سناریو سازی و اینکه چطور مفاهیم به ساده ترین حالت ممکن توضیح داده بشه و جذاب هم باشه خیلی زحمت پاش میخوره این کمک میکنه که آدم انگیزه داشته باشه برای ساخت بخش های دیگه دمتون گرم ❤️😊
❤10🔥3👍2
Signed PapiDon
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PapiDon_coding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوست دارید توی کانال درباره کدام موضوعات مطالب بیشتری گذاشته بشه ؟
The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2025 to 1 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 41,637 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اتاق برنامه نویسی </>” (@PapiDon_coding), 371 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PapiDon_coding.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.