2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 737–739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:03
738
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:57
738
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 738 subscribers
Avg views / post
289
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
20 (28 July 2025 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
578
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
195
Videos
50
Links
284
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
242 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
127
52.5%
❤🔥
28
11.6%
👍
24
9.92%
⚡
23
9.50%
👌
18
7.44%
💔
17
7.02%
💯
3
1.24%
🥱
1
0.413%
🦄
1
0.413%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دنیای واقعی بیرحم است و نیازی به گفتنش نیست، ورود به بازار کار و پیداکردن شغل یا پروژهی مناسب هم این روزها از هر زمان دیگری سختتر شده.
در حوزهی ترجمه و چاپ کتاب، بیشتر ناشرها تولیدشان را کم کردهاند، چون هزینههای تولید سرسامآور بالا رفته و کاغذ کمتری هم در بازار است؛ پس ظرفیت جذب مترجم بسیار کمتر شده و احتمالاً کمتر هم خواهد شد. افزایش هزینهی تولید هم حساسیت روی کیفیت را بیشتر کردهاست.
همهی اینها دست در د…
#مشاوره
آگهیهای استخدام و جذب نیرو نسبتبه پارسال کاهش چشمگیری پیدا کردهاند. برای متمایز کردن خودت از بقیهٔ متقاضیان خیلی بیشتر از قبل به رزومهسازی استاندارد و حرفهای بها بده و برایش وقت بگذار.
فقط به کلیککردن دکمهای و ارسال رزومه هم بسنده نکن. حالا که سازمان یا نهادی را پیدا کردهای که به تخصصات نیاز دارد از صف طولانی بررسی درخواستها بیرون بزن و از راههای دیگر کارفرما را پیدا کن و رزومه و نمونهکارهایت را…
✨ من رؤیایی دارم
همیشه دلم میخواست نشر خودم را داشته باشم و کتابهایی را منتشر کنم که دوستشان دارم؛ با همان کیفیتی که فکر میکنم لایق خوانندهها و کتابهاست.
سالها با این رؤیا زندگی کردم تا شاید روزی شرایط فراهم شود، اما مگر در این جغرافیای همیشهمتلاطم روز خوب از راه میرسد؟ این شد که در دل سیاهترین روزها که هزار بلا و مصیبت بر سرمان ریخته بود و در ناامیدی دستوپا میزدم دیدم دیگر جای صبر نیست. با خودم گفتم: «م…
در نهایت «عادی» برای اکثریت ما کلمهای بعید و بیگانه است که فقط وصفش را شنیدهایم و میتوانیم برویم توی یکی از آن واژهنامههای کتوکلفت معنایش را بخوانیم، ولی شاید هرگز مفهومش را درک نکنیم، شاید هرگز زندگیاش نکنیم، حالا هرچقدر هم که میخواهد خیال کنیم که هم خودمان «عادی» هستیم، هم وضعمان.
@Owlpedia
دو تجربهی شخصی:
۱. آن اولاولهای کارم، دوست ویراستاری بود که سر خیلی موضوعهای کاری با هم اختلاف نظر داشتیم. یک بار موضوعی که سرش بحثمان شد همین بود که (نقل به مضمون) گفت تو چرا این همه از قیدهای -انهدار استفاده میکنی، اشتباهه.
کارم اشتباه نبود، از روی شم زبانیام مطمئن هم بودم. (شاید انتظار داشت که همهاش بهطرز و بهنحو و از این دست چیزها ببیند؛ نمیدانم.)
امروز نومترجم دیگری آمد و همین را پرسید که اشتباه ا…
(خیلی) کوتاه دربارهی نشانههای قیدی در فارسی
در ترجمه و نگارش و ویرایش، یکی از کارهایی که خیلی دیدهام مترجم و نویسنده و حتی ویراستار انجام بدهد، آوردن قید با نشانههای قیدی است:
بهخوبی میدانستم که این متن بهطرز عجیبی ایراد دارد.
نکتهی خیلی واضحی که خیلیها نادیدهاش میگیرند این است که در فارسی خیلی از قیدها «نشانه» ندارند و روی دیگر یک صفت هستند:
خوب میدانستم که این متنْ عجیب ایراد دارد.
انگار این هم مثل …
چطور ترجمهمان را بهتر کنیم و مترجم بهتری باشیم؟
| چکیدهی تجربهی ترجمه
۱. مهمترین و اصلیترین راهش کسب تجربه است. هر مترجم مسیر خاص خودش را طی میکند و نمیشود برای همه یک نسخه پیچید، اما ترجمه کنید و ترجمه کنید، نومترجم برای کسب ترجمه به همهچیز ناخنک میزند و سبکهای مختلف را امتحان میکند تا دستش گرم بشود و ببیند که در رویارویی با متنهای مختلف چه کارهایی از دستش برمیآید. (در پوشهی تمرینهای خودم بیشتر از بی…
اگر مترجم و مخاطب این نرخنامهی ترجمه هستید، یک نکتهی تجربی کوتاه:
یکی از کارهای خوبی که گروه «مترجم شدن» و آقای بشیری در این سالهای اخیر کردهاند تهیهی نرخنامهای برای شاخههای مختلف ترجمه است که حداقل دستمزد بهینهی مترجم را محاسبه میکند.
البته باید توجه داشت که این نرخنامه «دستوری» و برای کارفرماها لازمالاجرا نیست و بیشتر نقش راهنمایی کلی را دارد، چون واقعیتهای بازار کار ترجمه از نشری تا نشر دیگر و برای…
💰نرخنامهٔ ترجمه ۱۴۰۴ (نیمسال دوم)
مطابق با قانون کار ایران و با درنظرگرفتن ساعت کار روزانهٔ مترجمان
این نرخنامه هر شش ماه یکبار (اواخر فروردین و مهر) متناسب با شرایط بازار و تورم بهروزرسانی میشود
برای محاسبهٔ سریع و راحت قیمت انواع خدمات ترجمه مینیاپ مترجمشدن را اجرا کنید: @motarjemshodan_bot
برای اثرگذاری بیشتر به اشتراک بگذارید. ❤️
#ترجمه #مترجم #مترجم_شدن #مترجم_حرفه_ای #دستمزد #دستمزد_۱۴۰۴ #دستمزد_متر…
۱/۱ در آغاز کلمه بود
و کلمه نزد خدا بود
و کلمه خدا بود.
۱/۲ در آغاز او نزد خدا بود.
۱/۳ همهچیز به میانجی او بود،
بی او هیچ نبود.
۱/۴ آنچه در او بود حیات بود،
و حیات نور آدمیان بود،
۱/۵ و نور در ظلمت میدرخشد
و ظلمت آن را فرا نگرفته است.
~ عهد جدید، انجیل یوحنا،
ترجمهی پیروز سیار
@Owlpedia
❤13⚡2
Signed بهنام حاجیزاده
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Owlpedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 728,302 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموت هوربوف” (@Owlpedia), 738 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Owlpedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
