قراره توی یک گروه جدید سبک زندگی خودم رو به اشتراک بذارم اگر دوست دارید با من همراه باشید بهم پیام بدید @Nazanin_Health1 https://rubika.ir/LifestyleGroup
❤1

Channel
@OurLifestyleGroup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004330224452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OurLifestyleGroup |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OurLifestyleGroup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 9 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 9 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 58 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
23 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قراره توی یک گروه جدید سبک زندگی خودم رو به اشتراک بذارم اگر دوست دارید با من همراه باشید بهم پیام بدید @Nazanin_Health1 https://rubika.ir/LifestyleGroup
❤1
✅️نامنظمی پریود یک علامته، نه یک تشخیص. خیلی از خانمها با دیدن اولین نامنظمی نگران میشن و تصور میکنن حتماً دچار تنبلی تخمدان شدن، در حالی که عوامل مختلفی میتونن روی چرخه قاعدگی اثر بذارن. اگر شما هم تجربه نامنظمی پریود داشتید، برام بنویسید فاصله پریودهاتون بیشتر شده یا کمتر؟ رزرو نوبت مشاوره خصوصی آنلاین: @Nazanin_Health1 http://t.me/OurLifestyleGroup https://rubika.ir/LifestyleGroup
خیلی از خانم ها از نامنظم بودن پریودهاشون شکایت دارن ولی تعداد کمی از اونها میدونن، که بینظمی پریود همیشه به معنی بیماری نیست؟ با من همراه باشید تا بیشتر به این مورد بپردازیم رزرو نوبت مشاوره خصوصی: @Nazanin_Health1 http://t.me/OurLifestyleGroup https://rubika.ir/LifestyleGroup
❤1
چطور چرخه اضطراب رو بشکنیم؟ | بخش ۲ 🌱اگر تا اینجا با خودت گفتی: «باشه... فهمیدم مضطربم و پذیرفتم.» تبریک! نصف راه رو اومدی. اما اگر بعد از اون همون گوشه بشینی و دوباره به همون فکرها ادامه بدی، مغزت باز هم همون مسیر قدیمی رو فعال میکنه. اینجاست که باید رفتار متفاوتی انجام بدی. نه برای پرت کردن حواس؛ بلکه برای اینکه به مغزت ثابت کنی خطری وجود نداره. بهترین انتخابها معمولاً فعالیتهای فیزیکی یا حسی هستن: 🚶♀️ چند د…
❤1
چطور چرخه اضطراب رو بشکنیم؟ | بخش ۱ 🌿 ۱. آگاه شو اول از خودت بپرس: «الان واقعاً اتفاق مهمی افتاده، یا مغزم طبق عادت داره این واکنش رو تکرار میکنه؟» گاهی مغز، فقط چون بارها یک الگوی فکری را تکرار کرده، همان مسیر را دوباره فعال میکند. اگر دلیل واقعی برای نگرانی وجود نداشت، به خودت یادآوری کن: «لازم نیست هر فکری رو باور کنم. میتونم از این چرخه بیرون بیام.» همین چند ثانیه مکث، اولین قدم برای شکستن یک عادت قدیمیه. 🌿 …
❤1
سلام عزیزان 🌱 بالاخره پیج اینستاگرام رو هم راهاندازی کردم. اگر دوست داشتید خوشحال میشم اونجا هم همراهم باشید. 🤍 آدرس پیج: @nazanin_lifestylist لینک ورود سریع به پیج اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/nazanin_lifestylist?igsh=MTk4ZmM0Mno0Y3RxMw==
❤2
🤯 از شنیدن این جمله تعجب کردی؟ پس بیا بیشتر برات توضیح بدم 🤔فرض کن چند سال پیش یکی از عزیزانت رو از دست دادی، مدتی بعد شغلت رو از دست دادی و همزمان یک رابطه عاطفی هم برات تموم شد. طبیعیه که اون دوران، بدن مقدار زیادی کورتیزول و آدرنالین ترشح کنه؛ چون واقعاً تحت فشار بوده. اما اگر مغز برای مدت طولانی توی این حالت بمونه، کمکم به این الگوی فکر کردن عادت میکنه. از اون به بعد، حتی اتفاقهای کوچکی مثل دیر جواب دادن …
❤1
📂 پرونده شماره ۱ | بخش آخر 📍گاهی تفاوت نتیجه، از تفاوت بدنهاست؛ نه از کمکاری یا پرکاری افراد. سن، هورمونها، ترکیب بدن، میزان فعالیت و حتی کیفیت خواب، همگی روی نیازهای تغذیهای ما اثر میگذارند. به همین دلیل، یک برنامه غذایی که برای یک نفر عالی عمل میکند، ممکن است برای فرد دیگری بهترین انتخاب نباشد. در اصلاح سبک زندگی، هدف پیدا کردن «بهترین رژیم» نیست؛ هدف پیدا کردن «بهترین برنامه برای بدن خودمان» است. 🌿 📌 پرونده…
❤1
📂 پرونده شماره ۱ | بخش ۲ 📍همه چیز از بیرون شبیه هم بود... اما یک تفاوت مهم وجود داشت که در نگاه اول دیده نمیشد. سن فقط یک عدد نیست؛ با افزایش سن، نیازهای بدن هم تغییر میکنند. همان رژیمی که برای یک خانم ۳۰ ساله نتیجه خوبی میدهد، ممکن است برای یک خانم ۵۰ ساله کافی نباشد. در این بخش، بررسی میکنیم که این تفاوت از کجا شروع میشود و چرا برنامه غذایی این دو نفر نباید کاملاً یکسان باشد 🌿 Lifestyle Group | تغذیه، سلا…
❤1
Channel photo updated
📁 پرونده شماره ۱ | بخش اول دو نفر میتونن تقریباً یک سبک زندگی داشته باشن، اما نتیجه کاملاً متفاوتی بگیرن. یکی از مهمترین دلایلش اینه که بدن ما در سنین مختلف، نیازهای متفاوتی داره. در این پرونده، قدمبهقدم بررسی میکنیم چرا تغذیه یک خانم ۳۰ ساله نباید دقیقاً مثل یک خانم ۵۰ ساله باشه. 🌱 رزرو نوبت مشاوره تخصصی آنلاین @Nazanin_Health1 📱 تلگرام https://t.me/OurLifestyleGroup 💚 روبیکا https://rubika.ir/Lifestyl…
❤2
تلگرام https://t.me/OurLifestyleGroup روبیکا https://rubika.ir/LifestyleGroup بله https://ble.ir/lifestylegroup ایتا https://eitaa.com/Lifestylegroup
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OurLifestyleGroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 290,153 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سبک زندگی سالم با نازنین” (@OurLifestyleGroup), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OurLifestyleGroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.