Channel
@OnChainGains
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
77subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001820968878 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OnChainGains |
| Description | Trading Narratives & Volume $SOL, $BNB & $ETH Exclusive Calls by The Natural π Owner: @therealnatural X: https://x.com/onchaingains DM me for any inquiries πΌ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OnChainGains |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 77 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 77 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 7 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Iβll be sticking to my speciality and thatβs sharing conviction plays with the best narratives. No gambles. Only established projects. Appreciate everyone whoβs here. 2025 is near and weβre going to make a lot of gains together! ππ
ππ π²ππππ π·πππππ πΎπππ€πβ¨ pinned Deleted message
Congrats to everyone who bought the Hippo known as $MOODENG when I shared it with the gang at the pico bottom π 15x for the channel and itβll be in the billions as well π₯ I share the best of the best for this channel. ππ π²ππππ π·πππππ πΎπππ€ will always aim to call certified future billion dollar projects π
β€1
Congrats on anyone who bought into $FWOG from this channel! It reached well over $700mill+ and itβll be the next one to fly to billions after its consolidation ππΈ
ππ π²ππππ π·πππππ πΎπππ€πβ¨ pinned Β«Update: Iβve changed my chart formats and Iβll be posting a lot more on TG as well since I see new members joining. Thereβs going to be a lot more calls on here rather than my X. I donβt want to shill too many coins on my X account so Iβll be providing wayβ¦Β»
$FWOG ATH: $265m π Currently: $241m FWOG looks ready to blow past the ATH and send towards $300m+ IMO. It can still have a bit of a retrace towards the $150m-200m levels if we do end up getting a small pullback on BTC but the support levels have been holding very tight. $150m is actually considered a steal nowadays. I called this at $36m on my X and itβs done a whopping 7.3x since then! Billions is programmed. Itββ¦
π₯1
Update: Iβve changed my chart formats and Iβll be posting a lot more on TG as well since I see new members joining. Thereβs going to be a lot more calls on here rather than my X. I donβt want to shill too many coins on my X account so Iβll be providing way more alpha on here. Appreciate the new subscribers!
$SCF ATH: $170m π Currently: $65m SCF is looking primed for the next leg. Held the overall trendline and RSI is at an all time low! $100m+ is coming once again.. itβs an easy bet if you ask me. The project usually pulls big moves once it begins to run. It has periods of accumulation for weeks and then it pulls a huge candle. This will end up being one of the big winners on $SOL. DCA levels to consider: $50m-70m
β‘1
Wow I called a coin on this TG that got listed on Binance. Thatβs a first! $44m > $335m π Currently: $165m π $MOODENG now listed on Binance Futures. π Congrats if you printed on this when I shared it last month. Havenβt been as active on TG but Iβll make sure to call another banger real soon.
β€1
$MOODENG $250m πππ Huge hit for the channel π₯π₯ Congrats if you got in!!!
$MOODENG $145m π 3.5x π₯π₯ Congrats to anyone who got in!
$MOODENG touched $100m π₯π ATH π Damn the 1st call back from hiatus turned out to be the top Solana coin of the month π
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OnChainGains. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OnChainGains named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ π²ππππ π·πππππ πΎπππ€πβ¨β (@OnChainGains), 77 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnChainGains.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.