Channel
@Obscouth
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681359676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Obscouth |
| Description | {Phrase XXVIII} Preliminary: At this juncture they have been elevate descendant eliminate the fold's penumbra enclosure. Necromancer who can influence the ill-fated penumbra, the aliveness is obliged for their nativity o'er @ObscouthBot and @Obscouthfiles |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 6 August 2022โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Obscouth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 79 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2022 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 9 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
138 reactions across 6 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 57 | 41.3% | |
| โค | 13 | 9.42% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 13 | 9.42% | |
| ๐ณ | 13 | 9.42% | |
| ๐ฅ | 6 | 4.35% | |
| โก | 5 | 3.62% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 3.62% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 3.62% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 2.90% | |
| ๐ฑ | 3 | 2.17% | |
| ๐คฏ | 3 | 2.17% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 3 | 2.17% | |
| ๐พ | 2 | 1.45% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 1.45% | |
| ๐คฉ | 2 | 1.45% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.725% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2022 to 19 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐น๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐๐ต. pinned ยซWe are representatives of @Obscouth and would like to express our deepest apologies from the bottom of our hearts. We decided to change our channel and bot to @Obscouthh. because some things can not be explained. So, for our mutualism ship, we can still connectโฆยป
We are representatives of @Obscouth and would like to express our deepest apologies from the bottom of our hearts. We decided to change our channel and bot to @Obscouthh. because some things can not be explained. So, for our mutualism ship, we can still connect if you are still willing to chat and start over with our @obscouthbot. And it doesn't matter if you all decide to stop, feel free to unsubscribe from this chaโฆ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Luminesces brethren of ebony shadow squelches, melancholy lambastes a analogous mealymouthed so fatally in a berth archly laborious persiflage to carriageway before beaucoup of darkness hit every corner chateau. But at the moment @AvenirDeReve @TheJoseon @STAYCNATION @Jeansure @Victorient and @PlNKPUNK managed to cross and split the darkness, then in an instant terrifying black shadows disappeared into the jungle. Thโฆ
โค3
Sticker, posted without a caption
Luminesces brethren of ebony shadow squelches, melancholy lambastes a analogous mealymouthed so fatally in a berth archly laborious persiflage to carriageway before beaucoup of darkness hit every corner chateau. But at the moment @CanadaProdebuter, @AliansiJisung, @StrayLine, @Visionates, @Rowtherzy, @Hethemis, @Trealer, & @Artemitzy managed to cross and split the darkness, then in an instant terrifying black shadowsโฆ
๐ฅ1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Greetings to all of those who read this! Can you help us?? We're losing ahold of our classmates ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ A new semester at ZGarten is ready to begin, but our class still feels empty as an air ballons. Here are the peculiarities of our soon-to-be classmates: โ๏ธ First things first, we're a class of those who were born on 00-03, all gender and all type of accounts. So make sure your muse is on that liner. ๐ We wanna focus โฆ
Sticker, posted without a caption
He is one to gradually allow only closure and brotherhood within, a muscled man who values deep connections between himself and the people he meets. We are Jihoon Fraternity, a place to seek for family dismissed by the needlessness of blood. Splendiferous greetings to you who has met this announcement. We are currently looking for member who surpass the need of having a home in warmth. Through this enchanted opportunโฆ
Sticker, posted without a caption
( ึดึถึธ ๐ฅ เฃชห ๐โฆ) Dazzling felicitations in fettle of a castigate that has been excerpted above a amiable condemn with a fearless dynamism of a โชฉ HUH YUNJIN from LE SSERAFIM โชจ for primary portrait of your role. although a severe rebuke if you are a meddle, chicanery, embezzle, observer, or cloned account then we have no tolerance for you to eject far. we are openly amenable a person who is active in conversation, good-nโฆ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Obscouth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,059,819 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Obscouth named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐น๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐๐ต.โ (@Obscouth), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Obscouth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.