https://x.com/obitocrypto/status/2085341777356095550

Channel
Obitos Calls
@ObitosCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,756subscribers
-1,417 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001601652682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ObitosCalls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ObitosCalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 22,756 | -237 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 22,993 | -125 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 23,118 | -821 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 23,939 | -111 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 24,050 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 24,072 | -67 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 24,139 | -34 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 24,173 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.7%
- avg views ÷ 22,756 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,290
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Treasury Secretary Bessent says Senate Democrats are blocking the Crypto Clarity Act. @WatcherGuru
$ZEC has a near binary scenario around Ironwood. Bullish: if the Orchard → Ironwood migration continues smoothly with no rejected withdrawals, it strengthens the case that the exploit was never used. Bearish: if the turnstile starts blocking withdrawals while legitimate Orchard funds are still waiting to migrate, it could mean counterfeit ZEC exited first, leaving the deficit for everyone else. Until one of these …
closing thoughts for the week: $ZEC proved old coins can wake up $SOL proved flows and price can disagree for months $ANSEM proved a name is a market cap $CASHCAT proved nothing and made everyone money crypto in one week for you
https://x.com/obitocrypto/status/2080355621669400803
everyone screaming "$SOL is dead at $76" is the same crowd that called it dead at $8 ETFs took in over $1B and the chart looks like a heart monitor in a hospice flows don't lie. price is just late. stay poor if you wish
$CASHCAT did 9,000% off the low and -65% off the high in the same month if you're mad you didn't sell the top: you were never selling the top if you're mad you didn't buy the low: you didn't know it existed simple maths lad, get used to these markets
gm to everyone still here at $78 SOL not the timeline you wanted. the timeline you earned. we don't fold on Tuesdays
JUST IN: 🇪🇸🇦🇷 Spain defeats Argentina to officially win the FIFA World Cup. @BRICSNews
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Congress holds hearing to discuss Crypto Clarity Act. @WatcherGuru
Very bearish news in my opinion, especially for Ethereum
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Crypto Clarity Act is not projected to be signed into law this year despite President Trump meeting with Senators today to help advance the bill. @WatcherGuru
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ObitosCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 249,862 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Obitos Calls” (@ObitosCalls), 22,756 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObitosCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.