2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 02:45
125
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:32
125
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,370
Videos
≈275
Links
≈5,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2023 to 28 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$GROK hit 200 Mill while I was asleep. Absolutely smashed that fud from a week ago. Strongest coin since $PEPE too and no major tier 1s have max bidded it yet
100x for you lot. Hopefully this sparks the Ai/ Elon meta on eth again we had 2 weeks ago
$GROK ran to 100 mill in just a week. The amount of Elon tweets yet to come is also ridiculous. Goes to show never fade an Elon narrative in a market like this. Send it higher
50x right now and running for you chads
https://x.com/obitocrypt0/status/1723841471764131956?s=46&t=avNyKKVYxsfCwq4Gqw_i2Q
25 mill $GROK. That tweet kicked off a run and because of it Elon will keep tweeting non stop. Sitting at a 12x+ now. Market needed a fresh mooner so it’s about time.
https://x.com/obitocrypt0/status/1722081485329453210?s=46&t=avNyKKVYxsfCwq4Gqw_i2Q
Well this one at 5 mill a 2.5x. Bit annoying that there were 2 and I didn’t realise but shit happens. This one has taken off and with all the elon tweets that should be coming we could see higher
Wish these Elon coins didn’t launch when I’m asleep 💀 so I could’ve gotten you Chads in much earlier
Twitter: https://x.com/obitocrypt0/status/1720777003668832744?s=46&t=avNyKKVYxsfCwq4Gqw_i2Q
230k, 60k usd in LP, The current meta is autistc hype/meme hype. Watching $BEARY a 4chan meme. Expect a lot more plays that I post on my twitter to appear here. Gamble
Meme: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/this-is-nice-board-bury-pink-gril
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xf4944c9ad083ec4868771c60e83dd379dd050bf3
https://t.me/Bearyerc
Tweet: https://x.com/obitocrypt0/status/1719023764355023202?s…
New ATH $Bitcoin loading
Expecting Autistic hype to come back in so $ethereum should start reversing soon too. It’s already back over 10x the initial post on the channel and 30x+ twitter
https://t.me/ObitosCalls/6210
Watching fresh autistic plays and viral memes
https://x.com/obitocrypt0/status/1718426269941923900
Memes looking sendy, $DOG printing from our twitter call. $BTC running the proper way this time too, will start sharing plays here soon taking more risk too.
Also another giveaway shortly so be ready
800k, $GOOD, calling higher than usual but dev asked us to wait a bit, Feels Good Man is basically Pepes Movement to say Pepe wasn’t hate speech and means to feel good again.
Dev here we printed off some time back on $2.0 (3 mill ath)
Also deployed via @easedeployerbot
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x9d3054008918b66d43ec898d025013dfde3679b5
https://t.me/FeelsGoodErc
https://x.com/obitocrypt…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ObitosCaIls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ObitosCaIls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dogswapfinance named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Obitos Calls” (@ObitosCaIls), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ObitosCaIls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.