8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,025–13,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 02:46
13,028
-3
11 Aug 2026, 03:36
13,031
-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
13,034
-4
9 Aug 2026, 04:12
13,038
-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:01
13,041
-7
6 Aug 2026, 23:25
13,048
+2
6 Aug 2026, 10:05
13,046
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:46
13,046
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 13,028 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,910
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
25 (15 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
122,730
Reactions total
2,783
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,540
Videos
≈3,640
Links
≈2,310
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
17m 31s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,783 reactions across 25 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
577
20.7%
🔥
449
16.1%
👍
440
15.8%
❤
283
10.2%
🤣
257
9.23%
😁
202
7.26%
🤬
146
5.25%
👏
95
3.41%
😱
55
1.98%
🤔
33
1.19%
⚡
32
1.15%
💩
25
0.898%
🤡
23
0.826%
😢
22
0.791%
🕊
21
0.755%
👎
14
0.503%
🙈
13
0.467%
😭
11
0.395%
🤯
10
0.359%
🥰
8
0.287%
25 further kinds
67
2.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,783reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 25 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OUgol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уличный опрос по поводу атак Wildberries: кто должен нести ответственность за сгоревшие товары, готовы ли люди переплачивать за доставку ради укрепления защиты объектов и пошли бы работать на склады маркетплейсов за хорошие деньги?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vj8xcnm4DaA
Что происходит на фронте — Покровск, декабрь 2025 г.
Фрагмент пятой главы "Утилизации", которая скоро появится в открытом доступе, а ранняя версия доступна для спонсоров на YouTube.
Сейчас уникальная акция, которую проводит YouTube — спонсорство бесплатно на месяц. Можно посмотреть и отписаться, главное не забыть это вовремя сделать.
Кстати, "ранняя версия" не просто так называется — часто она отличается от будуще…
Яблоко открестилось от поддержки российской оппозиции в лице сторонников Навального и т.д., разместив фото и написав:
Считаем необходимым заявить: партия «Яблоко» категорически не имеет иностранных источников финансирования, не поддерживает никаких отношений с организациями, признанными нежелательными в Российской Федерации, и не считает заявления, обращения, мероприятия, проводимые кем бы то ни было за рубежом част…
Эх, Навального очень не хватает! Из этого получился бы хороший материал. А был бы Немцов — в морду бы сразу дал этому лысому. Да, среагировал на провокацию, зато искренне и есть что вспомнить!
А это всё как на передаче "слабое звено", когда слабаки всех сильных выкинули в первой половине передачи, и вторую часть зритель наблюдает какую-то жалкую пародию.
Но! Яблоко так или иначе за мир и еще в игре — мои поздравлен…
Закон об ограничениях для политпреследуемых эмигрантов вступил в силу. Теперь они не смогут получать загранпаспорта и пользоваться банковским счетом
Владимир Путин подписал закон о запретах для уехавших из страны россиян, которых осудили по политическим статьям. Соответствующий документ опубликовали на сайте правовых актов.
🔵 Ограничения распространяются людей, которых признали виновными в рамках уголовного дела в …
Целью организаторов взрыва у ресторана «Balzi Rossi» были гости частного мероприятия, проходившего на веранде ресторана, — «Коммерсант»
Как сообщает издание со ссылкой на источники, вечеринка находилась под усиленной охраной, что, вероятно, позволило избежать большего числа жертв.
По одной из версий, охранник остановил женщину, которая хотела пронести коробку и сообщила, что внутри находится подарок. Заподозрив нел…
Если ДР генерала. Какой генерал у нас родился недавно? Евкуров, Чайко, кто еще?
Тем временем движение транспорта временно закрыли на съезде с внешней стороны Садового кольца на Баррикадную улицу, съезде с внешней стороны Садового кольца в Кудринский переулок, съезде с Конюшковской улицы на Баррикадную улицу в сторону Садового кольца, съезде с Конюшковской улицы в Малый Конюшковский переулок.
Отменен Ночной велопара…
В ресторане «Balzi Rossi» в центре Москвы взрыв — погибли как минимум 3 человека, 15 ранены.
Пока мало что известно, слухи такие — праздновали день рождения генерала (имя неизвестно). Скоро узнаем
Ранняя версия главы 5 нового "путинизма" уже доступна для спонсоров. Как обычно подправим некоторые моменты, и видео выйдет в открытом доступе https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TkRclSW9MY
Всем благодарность за поддержку, просмотры, комментарии, распространение!
Еще один фрагмент из 5 главы "Утилизации". Без комментариев.
🔥68😱14😁4🙏2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @OUgol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Острый Угол” (@OUgol), 13,028 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OUgol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.