Channel
@OTmagazine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,435subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001148944619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OTmagazine |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 July 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OTmagazine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 1,435 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 1,437 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 1,436 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 1,435 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (20 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,642 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📚 خبر خوب برای جامعه کاردرمانی با افتخار، کتاب «نگاهی جامع به CO-OP» بهصورت الکترونیکی منتشر شد. این کتاب حاصل سالها مطالعه، تحقیق و تجربه بالینی است و با هدف ارائه یک منبع جامع، عملی و کاربردی برای یادگیری و اجرای بالینی رویکرد CO-OP تدوین شده است. در نگارش این مجموعه تلاش شده است مفاهیم فراتر از مباحث نظری، به شکلی کاربردی، قابل اجرا و مبتنی بر مثالها و مطالعات موردی ارائه شوند. ✨ علاوه بر متن اصلی کتاب، مناب…
با سلام و احترام به اطلاع همکاران گرامی میرساند، اینجانب در تاریخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۱۹ با ارائه نامه استعفا، از عضویت در هیأتمدیره انجمن علمی کاردرمانی ایران کنارهگیری نمودهام. این تصمیم پس از بررسی جمیع شرایط از آن رو اتخاذ شد که تداوم این مسئولیت، امکان ایفای نقشی را که برای پذیرش آن متعهد شده بودم، فراهم نمیکرد. همواره بر این باور بودهام که پذیرش مسئولیت زمانی ارزشمند است که فرصت واقعی برای خدمت، مشارکت مؤثر و پیشبرد …
برخی قوانین جدید نظام پزشکی نام گذاری برای دفترکارممنوع!! …
پیام مخاطبین آقای سرحدی در این سمینار گفتند که بیوفیدبک کف لگن و تمرین درمانی کار ما نیست !!! واقعا نمیدونم چی بگم هر چی کار کینم امثال ایشون و دکترحسینی نابود میکنند با همین حرف ایشون در حضور متخصصین مختلف ، ما که به سختی در حال ایجاد گشایش هایی در این حوزه ها بودیم باز به عقب برگشتیم
اختلافات پزشکان عمومی و متخصصین پوست برسر بوتاکس ،لیزر ،فیلر و… چه بحث آشنایی… تکلیف ما هممشخص هست موارد مورد درخواست ما هم در منابع آمده است و بعضا هم در کوریکولوم بوده است
📨 با سلام تکلیف کوریکولوم مشخص هست فصل ۲۷ کتاب هبیف کامل و جامع راجع به بوتاکس و فیلر و لیزر و عوارض بوده و زمان تحصیل ما این کتاب و سرفصل های ان منبع دانشگاهی بوده! تغییر کتاب به کتاب ناقص دکتر مرتضوی و شهیدی تو ۳ سال اخیر رخ داده که توسط متخصصین پوست داخل کشور نوشته شده و یکی از منابع اصلی این کتاب، کتاب هبیف بوده و به عمد فصل آخر که در خصوص فیلر و بوتاکس و لیزر است حذف شده و ما بقی سر فصل ها عینا مشابه همند!!!
حالا ربات بیار دیسلایک بزنه 👇👇👇 💧🔥
برگزاری سمینار و همایش های تخصصی در حیطههای سکته مغزی ،دست،زانو،شانه ،گیت،توانبخشی قلبی ریوی،مچ پا،ام اس،نوروماسکولار… با حضور همکاران شناخته شده فلوشیپ و فوق تخصص در این حیطه ها از نان شب برای کاردرمانی واجب تر است
فکر کردید بیخیال شدیم😅 خیلی وقت داشتید، حتی بعد جمع اوری این امضاها و جنگ ،اما هیچ قدمی ازشما در جهت پاسخگویی یا حرکت به سوی اهداف جمعی کاردرمانی دیده نشد ✌️✌️✌️
کارزار در دبیرخانه وزارت بهداشت ثبت شد✅
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @OTmagazine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 834,669 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OT magazine” (@OTmagazine), 1,435 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OTmagazine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.