Channel
@OFCMEILLEURC
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
513subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001156637564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCMEILLEURC |
| Created | 23 June 2021 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCMEILLEURC |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 513 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 516 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 517 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 517 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 January 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
46 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ข | 20 | 43.5% | |
| โค | 8 | 17.4% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 8.70% | |
| ๐ฅ | 4 | 8.70% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 3 | 6.52% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 4.35% | |
| ๐ป | 2 | 4.35% | |
| ๐ค | 2 | 4.35% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2023 to 2 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ pinned ยซ ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ โโทโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโทโ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ก๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง february, 2nd 2023 ๐elamat siang, salam lintas 6 agama. setelah memikirkan segala pertimbangan, maka pada hari ini 2 Feb 2023 @OFCROSCHVR RESMIโฆยป
๐ข๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ โโทโโโโโโโโโโ โโโโโโโโโโทโ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ก๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง february, 2nd 2023 ๐elamat siang, salam lintas 6 agama. setelah memikirkan segala pertimbangan, maka pada hari ini 2 Feb 2023 @OFCROSCHVR RESMI DINYATAKAN BUBAR. kami harap keputusan ini diterima oleh semua pihak. lantas untuk alasan pembubaran tidak dapat kami beberkan kepada khalayak publik. kepada semua member maupun adminโฆ
๐ข20๐1๐1
Sticker, posted without a caption
โก โ โฒ โขโขโข โ โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ Liked by @OFCSPOOKYLAND and 367.102 others. #๐๐๐๐๐ presents a gorgeus collusion to the entire macrocosm, a masterpiece that needs to be exposed to the whole earth. In sync with other cool squads, we are consolidated as one! Special tag : @OFCRRESOLD @SAO244OFC @DOMILOUSQ @AENDLESSSQUAD @CRYSTANSQ @OFCTHEMADAME @OFCMENTRICH @TAEGICITY @โฆ
Own, cown close ya bestih
Ayok gess join gamau simulasi naek pesawat? Dapet hadiah juga yakin gamau?
Ayo join yg gak paham pasti diajarin kok tenang aja
Sticker, posted without a caption
โก โ โฒ โขโข โ Liked by @OVERKILLOFC and 4.608.888 others ๐t January 25, 2023 ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ collaboration with ๐ฆ๐๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ข๐ ๐ฆ๐ค๐จ๐๐๐ฆ whose contents are homes for all their members. ๐ชe are together and become one โ ๏ธ ๐ฌ view all 1.222.222 comments 5 minutes ago โข see translation โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ โ โ โ โก
Sticker, posted without a caption
CLOSE.
๐1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @OFCMEILLEURC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,098,674 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@OFCMEILLEURC named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐โ (@OFCMEILLEURC), 513 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCMEILLEURC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.