Channel

#𝟯𝟮𝟳 - 𝗖𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗪𝗔𝗨𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚

@OFCCETERWAULING

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,736subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001441485844
Type	Channel
Username	@OFCCETERWAULING
Created	14 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/OFCCETERWAULING

Growth

4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,733–1,756 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 00:06	1,736	-13
9 Aug 2026, 05:01	1,749	-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:33	1,753	no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:52	1,753	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 1m 18s
Average length: 13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	1	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 129,614 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐍`
@ofc_blckswn · 122 posts OFC VENTURAJA
@venturaja · 162 posts ℭΔLZΕRO̸ GΛNK🇦🇴
@calzerogank · 241 post 10' 𝟐𝟐. 𝗗𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗪𝗢𝗟𝗙 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧
@dpwarchive · 1591 post 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐉𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐎𝐗 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊 || OPMEM
@jiancoxofc · 261 post (OPREC) LOTUS UNIVERSITY
@LOTUSUNIVERSITY · 221 post Bubar, free unsubs
@NekochiePackeu · 241 post 𝗔𝗧𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗢 𝗟𝗢𝗩𝗘
@OFCATLETICO · 951 post DORM MIMPI
@OFCDORMMIMPI · 251 post POSTER 𝗦𝗹𝗟𝞢𝗡𝗧 𝝖𝗢𝗗𝗥𝝖
@ofcsilentaodra · 381 post VALENVEGACH
@OFCV2 · 51 post ᩡ “ 🐰 ٫ [ MEMORIES ] 𝐒𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐘 𝐎𝐑𝐏𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐆𝐄 ՞⋆
@SCENERYORPHANAGE · 691 post STARSHINE POSTER
@starshineps · 611 post 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐒
@Street13ofc · 341 post SUDAH TIDAK AKTIF
@warmillofc · 111 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 194 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐂𝐎𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐒 || VAKUM
@COBRASOFC · 673 posts GHOSTEL PATNER
@ghostelpatner · 33 posts Memories : 𝐆ryphon
@GRYPHOFC · 4233 posts 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐉𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐎𝐗 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊 || OPMEM
@jiancoxofc · 263 posts 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗛𝗪𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗗𝗘𝗟
@OfCDEATH_SCHEDEL · 1473 posts Vogos Archive
@vogosarchive · 7853 posts Wheels | POSTER.
@Wegpost · 1433 posts Arsip REPNAYE
@collabjjrepnaye · 22 posts EGRYON BAR
@egryonbar · 22 posts 970. INEROEVEN
@ineroeven · 592 posts 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗕𝗘𝗝𝗔𝗗
@ofcbejad · 1,0742 posts BUBAR
@OFCBULLETPROOF · 1272 posts 𝐒𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐃 𝕯𝐄𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐒🦖
@OfficialDeinos · 202 posts FALL ØUT MEN // OPLINK
@OfficialFOM · 1092 posts POSTER RIGEL
@officialrigel · 852 posts REXVENDER MPPS
@rexvendermpps · 672 posts CLOSE | 𝐑𝐎𝐘𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐁𝐁𝐄𝐀𝐍 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋
@ROYALCARIBBEANHOSPITAL · 372 posts 𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐌𝐏𝐏𝐒 𝐂À𝐑𝐒𝐓𝐕𝐀 𝐕𝐎𝐋𝐊𝐀
@ArsipSmordGnk · 11 post BAGASWARA
@bagaswarampps · 61 post PARTNER NEO AGENT
@DISTRICTARSIP · 31 post PS DVN
@dvnps · 21 post PARTNER MICKEY PROMOTE
@MICKEYARSIP · 81 post –𝐍𝐄Ø𝐉𝐀𝐄 𝑺𝑸– VAKUM
@neojaesq · 3921 post PARTNERSHIP MRH
@partnershipmrh · 21 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#𝟯𝟮𝟳 - 𝗖𝗘𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗪𝗔𝗨𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚” (@OFCCETERWAULING), 1,736 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCCETERWAULING.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.