Azazel News pinned a video

Channel
Azazel News
@AzazelNews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,248subscribers
-584 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001417164314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AzazelNews |
| Description | Azazel: appears as a fallen angel responsible for introducing humanity to forbidden knowledge. This channel is dedicated to sharing actionable intelligence/knowledge regarding COVID19/Coronavirus/Protest/Riots. Azazel & Doomsday are Apolitical Org |
| Created | 12 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AzazelNews |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 26,248 | -81 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 26,329 | -36 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 26,365 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 26,374 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 26,399 | -21 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 26,420 | -26 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 26,446 | -49 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 26,495 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 26,503 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:09 | 26,521 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 26,531 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 26,541 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 26,545 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 26,555 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 26,566 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 26,584 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 26,596 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 26,602 | -24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 26,626 | -35 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 26,661 | first reading |
Engagement
957 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.393%
- avg views ÷ 26,248 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 103
- 266 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.29%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 267
- of 957 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 124 of 266 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 957 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,467 |
| Reactions total | 364 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 21:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈88,300
- Videos
- ≈79,400
- Links
- ≈115,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8h 58m
- Average length
- 1m 36s
Measured directly from 335 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,323 reactions across 320 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 531 | 40.1% | |
| 🔥 | 160 | 12.1% | |
| 🙏 | 72 | 5.44% | |
| 🥰 | 62 | 4.69% | |
| 😁 | 58 | 4.38% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 4.16% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 3.78% | |
| 🤣 | 42 | 3.17% | |
| 🫡 | 37 | 2.80% | |
| 👀 | 27 | 2.04% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 1.97% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 1.66% | |
| 🤬 | 20 | 1.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 1.36% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 1.36% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 1.21% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 1.13% | |
| 🤪 | 14 | 1.06% | |
| 😈 | 13 | 0.983% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 0.605% | |
| 21 further kinds | 59 | 4.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 335 of the 957 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Thank You @sigoak for this amazing report on the fight between the factions using Weather Warfare
💯11🫡6⚡1❤1👍1
Signed Aries
Who is Really In Control Of The Weather Blue Faction Weather Wizards are IN CONTROL of our North American Weather Systems Red Faction Parasites are LOCKED OUT OF WEATHER CONTROL You can all breath easier now whenever you look to the skies and see the lines They aren't being laid out to harm you - They are being laid out to Nourish The Land You're not being poisoned from the skies - You’re being poisoned in your …
❤8👏3
Signed John
WHAT CAN WE DO TO BE HEALTHY 1. Drink Only Distilled Water (supplement minerals if you need to) - This will allow your body to flush out any toxins - You'll be fine 2. Eat Organic - Stop eating their trash 3. Stop weakening your body with Alcohol(The Parasites love it when you drink their spirits) 3. GO TO THE FUCKING GYM - if you're a fat fuck Spray Ops are the least of your concerns - stop bitching about things ou…
❤4💯3
Signed John
Natural Law - The Correct Way To Poison High Level Evil Operates under Natural Law - They need your CONSENT If you wanted to poison a population while getting their consent - Spraying indiscriminately from the skies Voids Natural Law because nobody under the skies consented to it - Meaning they will have a Karmic Backlash from doing such a thing - a big backlash So How Are They Poisoning You? They aren't - Most o…
⚡5
Signed John
Health Effects of Weather Mod By judging the Weather Controllers based on Their Actions and not "what we hear" I believe it's safe to say now that the Blue Faction Weather Wizards are the ones laying out all of the Spray Ops we see in the sky everyday - What does this mean for our health? I've seen all of the patents, I've read all of the reports, I know all the theories regarding the trope that they are "Spraying …
Signed John
The Triage Method (Weather Mod Version) Orders of Magnitude (determining where to put effort) 1st - The areas requiring water immediately - Using High Definition Satellite Imagery they are able to distinguish which areas are in dire need of water by tracking the colors of the foliage - When an area starts turning brown(or whatever color they look for) they send water 2nd - Energy Harvesting - Once the dire areas a…
❤2
Signed John
Department of Energy Tomfoolery Links If you havn't figured it out yet "Department of Energy Tomfoolery" is code word for Dark Matter/Energy Harvesting Heres a set of all the examples I've compiled since figuring it out ⬇️⬇️ Figuring It Out (click and scroll down): https://t.me/doomsdayspray/5676 Department of Energy Tomfoolery: https://t.me/doomsdayspray/5854 Earthquake Overlay: https://t.me/doomsdayspray/5855…
Signed John
Weather Wizards & Altruism If at this point you're wondering why the Weather Wizards are Acting With Such Altruism and in a bit of disbelief that anyone would go through all this effort and spend all this money and manpower to Water The Land & Clear Out Evil with nothing in return... Understand that they are indeed gaining something from all of this - and this feeds into what we've been noticing regarding all the D…
Signed John
Sub-T Operations This is the operation that made me look back at the other operations I watched them build that vortex all week and guide it along the coast line - Bumper Ops all up the coast to keep it in The Gulf - They then guided it up over National Forest Land in TX and let that mother fucker spin and dump right in the armpit of a DUMB Entrance & Two Maglev Tunnels Again, WHY WOULD EVIL DUMP THIS ON THEMSELVE…
💯1
Signed John
When Green🟩⚔️vs Gold🟨🙇♂️ Spriggan How to kill a Rogue Scanner 🔪
🔥3❤1
Signed Aries
Video, posted without a caption
🔥5
Signed Aries
Showing the 12 most recent of 957 posts we hold for @AzazelNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AzazelNews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@DoomsdayCBRN · 1,65017 postsDoomsday Time Anomalies
@DoomsdayTimeAnomalies · 4,06016 postsDoomsday Tradecraft
@DoomsdayTradecraft · 2,41615 postsSky Trumpets
@SkyTrumpets · 58712 poststheEmperorWearsNoClothes
@theEmperorWearsNoClothes · 6719 postsDoomsday Icarus
@DOOMSDAYICARUS · 8198 postsLee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
@FreedomDoc1 · 24,5068 postsDoomsday Paranormal Videos
@paranormaldisclosure · 5,7487 postsLearningtowalk @AzazelNews
@LearningToWalk · 2,8106 postsDeProgrammed
@DeProgramed · 35 postsDoomsday Maritime
@DoomsdayMaritime · 2125 postsDoomsday Homework
@DoomsdayHomework · 1,7104 postsDoomsdayLuna
@DoomsdayLuna · 3934 postsDoomsday shortages
@DoomsdayShortages · 5934 postsStellar Tokens - Blessed Stellar
@blessedstellar · 293 postsMetaHuman(Doomsday)
@metahumandoomsday · 1,7743 postsWrath of God
@soulsurvivalcommunity · 23,3723 postsBunnyGramLife 🐰🐰🎆
@BunnyGramLife · 1332 postsWhiteBunnyQ
@WhiteBunnyQ17 · 652 postsRaven Jayne
@ravenjayne · 432 postsRocky Mountain Free Company
@rockymountainfreecompany · 32 postsAnon Health Library and News
@A_Lbray · 41 postAwakening of Mankind
@Awakening_of_Mankind · 191 postBOTMAN
@BotMan · 531 postLOCO LOBO
@Darthlocolobo · 2121 post🔊 @EuphonicEXOpolitic • Resonant Kindness, Exopolitic • Euphonic Light Network Reception Broadcast • IPR •°`
@EuphonicEXOpolitic · 171 postExposingTheTruth2day
@ExposingTheTruth2day · 4951 post5MOREVOTES Channel
@FL5morevotes · 1191 postGeneral MacArthur
@GenMacArthur · 71 postJenny's Corner
@Jennyshealthcorner · 591 postDe Nieuwshoorn
@Nieuwshoorn · 3,7661 postPirate of the ConspiraSEAS
@PirateOfTheConspiraSEAS · 431 postStarseeds & Wanderer's
@Starseeds369 · 1081 postStreet Talk/ Real Talk
@StilettoDee · 1,1521 postCBDC's, Vaccines, & THE GREAT RESET
@VaxPassCBDC · 31 postWashington State Patriots
@WashingtonStatePatriots · 1831 postAmerica First 2021
@americatruths · 151 postAwakeningindian_eye 👁
@awakeningindian_eye · 7091 postBitchriarchy
@bitchriarchy · 31 postE.C.U.
@ecuchat · 331 postEnergy as Medicine Channel
@energyasmedicine · 221 postMask Free USA & MORE!
@maskfreeusa · 2861 post🚫💉Parents That Choose
@parentsthatchoose · 901 post/RWHS/ Right Wing Health Squad
@theRWHS · 6941 postToreSays®+
@toresaysPlus · 44,7831 postTransform Spiritual Evolution
@tsevo · 201 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@doomposting · 7,90161 postsDoomsday Spray
@doomsdayspray · 1,17650 postsDoomsday Tradecraft
@DoomsdayTradecraft · 2,41614 postsDoomsday shortages
@DoomsdayShortages · 59313 postsDoomPosting Chat
@doomposters · 4,4023 postsMetaHuman(Doomsday)
@metahumandoomsday · 1,7743 postsDoomsday Paranormal Videos
@paranormaldisclosure · 5,7482 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@doomposting · 7,90164 postsTwitter (𝕏) Media Downloader دانلود از توییتر (ایکس)
@twittervid_bot · 139,74040 postsDoomsday Spray
@doomsdayspray · 1,1765 postsmrmbb333
@mrmbb333 · 53 postsNYPrepper
@nyprepper1 · 3,4863 postsAlways looking at the sky
@Rainmaker1973 · 833 postsDoomsday Radio
@DOOMSDAYRADIO · 2,6182 postsDoomsday Time Anomalies
@DoomsdayTimeAnomalies · 4,0602 postsabc13HOUSTON
@abc13HOUSTON · 51 postBreaking911
@breaking911 · 55,3291 postUs Homelabd Security News
@defense_Civil25 · 561 postDoomsdayLuna
@DoomsdayLuna · 3931 postMax Velocity
@MaxVelocityWX · 101 postMenchOsint 📡
@MenchOsint · 3,0791 postmyth
@moron · 9811 postOC Scanner 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
@OC_Scanner · 51 postPolice frequency
@police_frequency · 69,9961 postQUANTUM GUARD
@QuantumGuard17 · 8701 postIsaac’s Army
@ReturnOfKappy · 1151 postEvergreen Intel
@vcdgf555 · 91 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 20
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 20
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AzazelNews named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 1 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 1 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 1 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 1 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 1 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@disclosurehub · 74,772
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
@davidavocadowolfe · 103,011
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
@followsthewhiterabbit · 79,742
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
@police_frequency · 69,996
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@awakenedspecies · 141,823
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@RealHealthRanger · 63,338
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@stfn_news · 63,099
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@SGTnewsNetwork · 111,081
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@DrTenpenny · 89,219
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Azazel News” (@AzazelNews), 26,248 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AzazelNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.