Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙 #DKM

@Neiqing_Port

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

83subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004374470247
TypeChannel
Username@Neiqing_Port
DescriptionСтарый порт: @Nei_Port Для связи — @Nei_Linli Сотрудничаю: @liliDeStorm Инфо — @Neiqing_Info || Архив — @Archive_Nei || Бот — @Neiqing_DKMbot Патент на псевдоним Neiqing и название тгк. Инициалы — #Nei_DKM #Neiqing
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Neiqing_Port

Growth

838483.57 August 2026 — 84 subscribers7 August 2026 — 83 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–84 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:4683no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4883-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:4284first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
181.2%
avg views ÷ 83 subscribers
Avg views / post
150
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,858
Reactions total212
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54226174965050690793717.5%
custom 54227591230516498503516.5%
custom 53147815449911899582511.8%
custom 54224494945643154192511.8%
💘209.43%
custom 5422793727603157021178.02%
178.02%
custom 5314281013797485338146.60%
custom 531449412577974190873.30%
🎉73.30%
custom 522222361248796011741.89%
🥰41.89%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Neiqing_Port. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ᐧ ㅤ ׄ🤩🤩 𝖭𝖊𝖜 𝖴𝖓𝖎𝖔𝖓 🤩🤩🕯࿚꛱ 𖥔 ꛱࿙ 🤩 — 🔤 шла по ночному городу и встретил тебя, мой дорогой друг. ㅤ ‿︵🤩 — @Neiqing_Port ִ — @hyunhelp1 🤩🤩 🤩 — 🔤 тех пор любой путь стал легче. 🕷🕷🕷🕷 #союз

9 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Тк мне не отвечает заказчица я открываю снова набор, чтобы не сидеть без дела. Принимаю заказы!

💘2

9 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC68 views40 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩‿ 𝖮𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗/𝖯𝖗𝖆𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 ⸝⸝ @Nei_Linli 🤩 𓂅 𝖡𝖔𝖙: @Neiqing_DKMbot 🎁 𝖢𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖑 ִ 𑄽 🤩🤩 — Я фанатею от себя. Что скажите? 𔔁៹ 𝖱𝖊𝖛𝖎𝖊𝖜🤩 ִ𑄽୧ 𝓡𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍?35/45ྀིׄ🤩🤩 ۪ ˙ ᩠୨ 🕷🕷🕷🕷 𝖧𝖆𝖘𝖍𝖙𝖆𝖌: #Практика #аватарка #Neiqing ⁺🤩🤩੭୧

custom 5422617496505069079128custom 53147815449911899588custom 54227591230516498507custom 54224494945643154193custom 53144941257797419082

8 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC66 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩‿ 𝖮𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗/𝖯𝖗𝖆𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 ⸝⸝ @Nei_Linli 🤩 𓂅 𝖡𝖔𝖙: @Neiqing_DKMbot 🎁 𝖢𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖑 ִ 𑄽 🤩🤩 — Мне нравится, выглядит хорошо. 𔔁៹ 𝖱𝖊𝖛𝖎𝖊𝖜🤩 ִ𑄽୧ 𝓡𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍?25/3𝟢ྀིׄ🤩🤩 ۪ ˙ ᩠୨ 🕷🕷🕷🕷 𝖧𝖆𝖘𝖍𝖙𝖆𝖌: #Заказ #баннер #Neiqing ⁺🤩🤩੭୧

💘109custom 54227591230516498507🥰4custom 53147815449911899584custom 54226174965050690794custom 53144941257797419083custom 54227937276031570213

7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC82 viewsread 9 August 2026

Разрыв с @girckkk_port Причина:удаление канала, отписка от канала. Мне грустно. У меня союз с Гирк уже давно.. Ещё когда у неё в порту вроде было около 30 подписчиков, а тут такое(. #разрыв #важно

4 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC232 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩‿ 𝖮𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗/𝖯𝖗𝖆𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 ⸝⸝ @Nei_Linli 🤩 𓂅 𝖡𝖔𝖙: @Neiqing_DKMbot 🎁 𝖢𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖑 ִ 𑄽 🤩🤩 — Я всё ещё жду ответа от заказчика, поэтому доделала практику. Мне кажется выглядит ахуенно. Что вы думаете? 𔔁៹ 𝖱𝖊𝖛𝖎𝖊𝖜🤩 ִ𑄽୧ 𝓡𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍?30/3𝟢ྀིׄ🤩🤩 ۪ ˙ ᩠୨ 🕷🕷🕷🕷 𝖧𝖆𝖘𝖍𝖙𝖆𝖌: #Практика #баннер #Neiqing ⁺🤩🤩੭୧

custom 542261749650506907913custom 542244949456431541910custom 542275912305164985010custom 52222236124879601173custom 54227937276031570213💘2custom 53147815449911899582

3 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC186 views37 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩‿ 𝖮𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗/𝖯𝖗𝖆𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖊 ⸝⸝ @Nei_Linli 🤩 𓂅 𝖡𝖔𝖙: @Neiqing_DKMbot 🎁 𝖢𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖊𝖑 ִ 𑄽 🤩🤩 — Мне нравится, выглядит хорошо. 𔔁៹ 𝖱𝖊𝖛𝖎𝖊𝖜🤩 ִ𑄽୧ 𝓡𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍?30/3𝟢ྀིׄ🤩🤩 ۪ ˙ ᩠୨ 🕷🕷🕷🕷 𝖧𝖆𝖘𝖍𝖙𝖆𝖌: #Заказ #баннер #Neiqing ⁺🤩🤩੭୧

custom 54224494945643154198custom 54227591230516498507💘6custom 54226174965050690795custom 53142810137974853383custom 53147815449911899583custom 54227937276031570213custom 53144941257797419082

1 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC207 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

ᅠ️️ᅠ️️» 𝕰ra with 𝐇𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖞

custom 54227937276031570216

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Neiqing_Port. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 150,777 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

[Продажа канала] <𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙
@Nei_Port · 198
9 posts
<𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙
@Neiqing_Info · 85
4 posts
[РЕСТ]|𝕭𝖚𝖑𝖑𝖊𝖙 𝕿𝖎𝖒𝖊|
@boothilllllll · 255
2 posts
{𝒫𝒶𝓇𝒹ℴ𝒻ℯ𝓁𝒾𝓈 𝒞𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓃ℯ𝓁}
@RinvePort · 426
2 posts
𝓙𝓰𝓮𝔃 / 𝓘𝓝𝓕𝓞
@bannersJgez · 21
1 post
РЕСТ @. 𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗙 𝗣 ꯭𝗥𝗧 ᢉ𐭩 ˖
@chefportt · 84
1 post
˚₊‧ ꠶ ♡ 𝗟𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗧ɑ𝗄𝖾𝗌 𖥻❕⊹ ࣪˖⁩
@dear3heart · 111
1 post
꧁ 永辉 𝑫𝛾𝔫𝔞𝔰𝔱𝛾 ꒷ ⏝
@Dynasty_port · 34
1 post
𝐸𝑟𝑠𝑖 — ⲓⲛϝo (´-ω-`)
@ersiinfo_design · 15
1 post
𝐈݊ꪀ𝐟ᨵׁׅׅ ˗ˋˏ #𝐌υׁׅ݊ꪀ𝐝𝐲 ˎˊ˗
@info_MuniMunn_qwq · 7
1 post
(!!) 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼 #
@InfoVezalyDes · 15
1 post
◆Каляки конни 🪺
@kalyakikonni · 15
1 post
. ౨ৎ ˙ 𝑀ɑׁׅ𝑟𝑐ℎ'𝓢 ִ 𝑷𝘯𝘨 .ᐟ
@march_png · 47
1 post
꒰ 𑁯 ִִֺ۪ 𓈒 ─꯭ ℳ𝑒𝓻𝖐𝙞∣∣ 𝒫ℴ𝔯𝑡 𝅄 ੭ ִ
@merkiilx · 134
1 post
░ ˎˏ𝐌ᥙn͜͡𝐝𝐲ˋˊ :: ♯𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝 ˒˓
@Muni_Munn_qwq · 86
1 post
ֵ♡゙ 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐊𝐞𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢 𝐢𝐧foㅤׂㅤ ✧
@Portinfoketlinsi · 15
1 post
[ЧИСТКА СОЮЗОВ]𝖵𝗂𝗏𝗂 𝖯𝑜𝗋𝗍. . .🪷
@PortVivi · 91
1 post
૮ׂ 𖹭፝֟͝𖹭 𝗮𝗸𝗶𝐭𝗶! 𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗿
@saki_tutor · 102
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙 #DKM” (@Neiqing_Port), 83 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neiqing_Port.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.