По сути в порте 200 подписчиков. 166 звёзд. За уход/приход подписчиков не несу ответственности после продажи.

Channel
[Продажа канала] <𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙
@Nei_Port
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
198subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003874057465 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nei_Port |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nei_Port |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 198 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 199 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 131.1%
- avg views ÷ 198 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 260
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,596 |
| Reactions total | 244 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
399 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5314788889385269476 | 75 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5330351879475995710 | 73 | 18.3% | |
| custom 5334658683701861713 | 57 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5327843515495912719 | 55 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5328296462746952214 | 36 | 9.02% | |
| custom 5330064000703045426 | 31 | 7.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 5.76% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 4.51% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 4.26% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 1.50% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.25% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.251% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.251% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.251% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 86
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
- Most on one post
- 62
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nei_Port. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Цену обсудим в лс, но в звёздах думаю от 300 как минимум. Писать @Nei_Linli Приу оплату звёздами или рублями. (Если не продам канал, то оставлю.)
Channel name was changed to «[Продажа канала] <𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙»
Я думаю мне надо продать канал.
Нью эра есть. Со всеми кто не отметился разрыв. Если вас нет в списках, то отметьтесь под этим постом или в другом порте. Жду от всех союзников подписку и после буду проверять их.
🔥5💘3
🔹🔠🔠 🔹🔠🔠🔠 🥹🥹🥹任何技能都需要練習。❄️❄️🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹𝐵𝓎 Neiqing <𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙> 🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩🌬 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: — Отзыв заказчика: тык. 🥹Ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲕⲁⳅⲟⲙ — @Nei_Linli🥹@Neiqing_DKMbot <Реакции, пожалуйста.> 27/50 🥹🥹🔹ags: #заказ #аватарка #баннер #Neiqing
custom 53147888893852694769custom 53278435154959127196custom 53303518794759957106custom 53300640007030454263custom 53346586837018617132🎉1custom 53282964627469522141
🥹🥹🥹🔤🔠🔠 🔤🔠🔠🔠🔠🥹🥹 🥹 🥹🥹 🥹🥹 ❄️❄️ 🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹Ⲥⲉⲅⲟⲇⲏя ⲃ эⲧⲟⲧ ⲡⲣⲉⲕⲣⲁⲥⲏыύ ⲇⲉⲏь ⳝⲩⲇⲩⲧ ⲥⲕⲣⲉⲡⲗⲉⲏы ⲇⲃⲁ ⲙυⲣⲁ.🥹 💙🔹орогой, Меркилл, да будет это лучшим началом для нас обоих. Сегодняшний дружеский союз происходит между: 🥹@Neiqing_Port и 🥹@merkiilx 🥹@Nei_Linli и 🥹@Merkillx ∘˚˙✛Ⲏⲁⲱ ⲥⲟюⳅ — ⲏⲟⲃⲁя эⲣⲁ ⲃⲟⳅⲙⲟⲯⲏⲟⲥⲧⲉύ υ υⲇⲉύ ⲇⲗя ⲏⲁⲥ ⲃⲥⲉⲭ. Ⲡⲩⲥⲧь эⲧⲟⲧ ⲡⲩⲧь ⳝⲩⲇⲉⲧ ⲥⲡⲟⲕⲟύⲏыⲙ, ⳡⲉⲥⲧⲏыⲙ υ …
❤🔥6custom 53278435154959127191
🔹🔠🔠 🔹🔠🔠🔠 🥹🥹🥹任何技能都需要練習。❄️❄️🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹𝐵𝓎 Neiqing <𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙> 🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩🌬 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: Я довольна заказом. Давайте реакций мне на такую красоту. Отзыв заказчика: тык. 🥹Ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲕⲁⳅⲟⲙ — @Nei_Linli🥹@Neiqing_DKMbot <Реакции, пожалуйста.> 53/50 🥹🥹🔹ags: #заказ #аватарка #баннер #Neiqing
custom 531478888938526947623custom 533035187947599571016custom 533465868370186171313🎉4custom 53300640007030454261
🔹🔠🔠 🔹🔠🔠🔠 🥹🥹🥹任何技能都需要練習。❄️❄️🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹𝐵𝓎 Neiqing <𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙> 🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩🌬 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: Япи, заказ. Мне нравится. Отзыв заказчика: нету. 🥹Ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲕⲁⳅⲟⲙ — @Nei_Linli🥹@Neiqing_DKMbot <Реакции, пожалуйста.> 53/50 🥹🥹🔹ags: #заказ #аватарка #Neiqing
custom 531478888938526947620custom 533035187947599571013custom 532829646274695221412custom 53278435154959127194custom 53346586837018617134
🔹🔠🔠 🔹🔠🔠🔠 🥹🥹🥹任何技能都需要練習。❄️❄️🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹𝐵𝓎 Neiqing <𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙> 🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌬 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: Мне вроде нравится, а вроде нет. Как вам? 🥹Ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲕⲁⳅⲟⲙ — @Nei_Linli🥹@Neiqing_DKMbot <Реакции, пожалуйста.> 50/50 🥹🥹🔹ags: #практика #баннер #Neiqing
custom 532784351549591271918custom 531478888938526947613custom 533035187947599571011custom 53346586837018617136custom 53300640007030454265custom 53282964627469522142
🔹🔠🔠 🔹🔠🔠🔠 🥹🥹🥹任何技能都需要練習。❄️❄️🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🥹🥹🥹𝐵𝓎 Neiqing <𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙> 🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩🌬 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕: Мне не очень нравится. Отзыв заказчика: тык. 🥹Ⳅⲁ ⳅⲁⲕⲁⳅⲟⲙ — @Nei_Linli🥹@Neiqing_DKMbot <Реакции, пожалуйста.> 36/50 🥹🥹🔹ags: #заказ #баннер #Neiqing
custom 533465868370186171313custom 53303518794759957109custom 53300640007030454268custom 53147888893852694765custom 53282964627469522141
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Nei_Port. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 731,536 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[Продажа канала] <𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙” (@Nei_Port), 198 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nei_Port.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.