Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nebraska Active Club

@Nebraska_Active_Club

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213930385
TypeChannel
Username@Nebraska_Active_Club
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nebraska_Active_Club

Growth

325330327.56 August 2026 — 325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 330 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 324–331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:13330+5
6 Aug 2026, 21:48325no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:08325first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 8 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
770.2%
avg views ÷ 330 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held13 (8 July 20251 August 2026)
Views total10,166
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

359 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18752.1%
11632.3%
👌298.08%
👍215.85%
💯61.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈2,650 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Bellevue, NE📍 We put ideas to action. Action creates brotherhood. Join Us / Who We Are

🔥61

24 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,200 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Gretna, NE📍 We're out here training. Where have you been? Join Us / Who We Are

🔥173

19 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC246 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @GreatPlainsActiveClubPhoto

⚾️ GPAC Summer Join / greatplainsactiveclub.us

🔥112

18 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈6,070 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Omaha, NE📍 Through everyday acts, we are building a community. Join Us / Who We Are

🔥133👍3

8 Jun 2026, 20:23 UTC552 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmericanaAestheticsPhoto

🎨 Kevin Kia — 'Nebraska's Moonlight'

19

4 May 2026, 02:42 UTC729 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Iowa_Active_ClubPhoto

GREAT PLAINS SOLIDARITY Hawkeye Active Club thanks our brothers from Nebraska AC and North Star AC for getting work in and bloodying their noses. Join Us

18

17 Jan 2026, 17:42 UTC≈5,930 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Omaha, NE📍 “Nothing else in the world…not all the armies…is so powerful as an idea whose time has come.” Join Us / Who We Are

24🔥11💯5👌2

11 Nov 2025, 17:42 UTC≈5,270 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Omaha, NE📍 Members of the Nebraska Active Club got together to celebrate Veteran’s day. Thank you to every veteran who’s defended our nation. 🇺🇸 Join Us / Who We Are

🔥369👌7

13 Oct 2025, 17:51 UTC≈2,950 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Lincoln, NE📍 We have people in our corner, do you? Join Us / Who We Are

21🔥15👌4👍2💯1

28 Sept 2025, 17:13 UTC≈1,480 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @HeartlandYouthPhoto

📍 Wichita, KS Heartland Youth Club members met up with Nebraska Active Club. Join Today: @UYVET

🔥16👌42

18 Aug 2025, 00:20 UTC≈4,320 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Last weekend, members of both the Lincoln & Omaha Chapters of the Nebraska Active Club conducted their weekly BJJ meets. Join us 👇🏻 NAC

🔥26👍8👌5

8 Aug 2025, 18:07 UTC≈6,150 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Last week, members conducted Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu training and rolled for the latter half of the meet. The high humidity, 100 degree heat, and lack of mats did not stop us. What’s Stopping You? NAC

🔥20👍86👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Nebraska_Active_Club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 48,696 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nebraska Active Club” (@Nebraska_Active_Club), 330 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nebraska_Active_Club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.