Channel
@Iowa_Active_Club
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
204subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002242525653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iowa_Active_Club |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iowa_Active_Club |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 204 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 202 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 202 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (31 March 2025 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 209 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
184 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 39.7% | |
| ⚡ | 67 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 23.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.543% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Any serious Nationalist would never consider attending any pre-advertised event; let alone one advertised by the half-jew, Jake Lang. To the goys that choose to follow him: you deserve your fate.
❤8
⚾️ GPAC Summer Join / greatplainsactiveclub.us
⚡8❤1
From the Loess Hills to the warehouses of the Quad Cities, men of the Hawkeye State are active everywhere. Every man must do his duty, including you. Join Us
🔥10⚡7❤5
We all had options for how best to spend the anniversary of our Nation's creation: Beers, hotdogs and mediocrity, Or personal and communal growth honoring our people's history with the reverence it deserves. Which did YOU choose? About us / Get Vetted
❤5🔥3⚡1
... ...people want to know that they’ll contribute towards something that is going to have staying power, ideally so complete that it reaches a final end. This is one of the core reasons why tourists and grifters have such an easy time making a killing on Twitter and other social media: people like certainty, so if someone can give them a plan, even if it’s knowingly or unknowingly fictitious, people will eat it up…
❤1
Hawkeye boys gathered in Eastern IA for a day in the forest Where were you? Join Us
⚡9❤3
Happy Father's Day to all the Dads! In a world determined to eliminate you and the family unit, you keep it going despite the attacks. Who We Are / Get Active
❤3
White boy summer is starting off hot this year 😎☀️
⚡7
📍Bismarck, North Dakota "We few, we happy few, we band of brothers. For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother" -Shakespeare, Henry V Join Us / Who We Are
❤6⚡4🔥1
GREAT PLAINS SOLIDARITY Hawkeye Active Club thanks our brothers from Nebraska AC and North Star AC for getting work in and bloodying their noses. Join Us
⚡18🔥4
Saturday's in the 319 >> Get Active Today Join Us
❤10
Today marks the 3rd Anniversary of our Brotherhood and Community Building Network In some form, we have all been the problem in the past, however, we are dedicated now in being the living solution into the future Join us in being a part of the solution for yourself, your family, your Nation, your Race, in North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, & Minnesota Who We Are / Join one of our Clubs greatplainsactivec…
🔥5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Iowa_Active_Club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 155,556 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Iowa_Active_Club named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hawkeye Active Club” (@Iowa_Active_Club), 204 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iowa_Active_Club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.