좀 두각을 나타내면 외국인들이 태그도 해주는 것 같아요 최근 코인판에서 이 정도 바운티 걸린 작업이 없었어서 그런가 재밌네요 암튼 전 당분간 제출 그만하고 마감 직전에 돌아올듯
❤1

Channel
@NEETCCT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
738subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002039284752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NEETCCT |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NEETCCT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 738 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 737 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 737 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,384 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
11 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
좀 두각을 나타내면 외국인들이 태그도 해주는 것 같아요 최근 코인판에서 이 정도 바운티 걸린 작업이 없었어서 그런가 재밌네요 암튼 전 당분간 제출 그만하고 마감 직전에 돌아올듯
❤1
https://lighter.fast/ 에서 15K $LIT을 걸고 오픈 오토리서치 챌린지를 하고 있더라구요 당연히 이 방에 광고가 들어와서 쓰는건 아니고 이름올린게 기분 좋아서 한 번 써봤어요 마감은 19일 정도라고 하네요 흥미가 있으신 분들은 한 번씩 해보셔도 재밌을 것 같아요
❤2
3/ 그러면 얘네들에 대해선 추적을 못하나? 일단 온체인 한정으로 말하면 Yes에 가깝긴한데 실제로 추적이 되는 사례들이 몇가지 있어요 정말로 간단하게 말하면 Opsec 실패지점을 찾는 것이라고 보면 될 것 같은데요 24년도 체이널리시스에서 유출된 XMR 추적 강의 영상을 바탕으로 예시를 들어보자면 0. 투명체인(BTC)에서 시작 → BTC→XMR 스왑(MorphToken) 입구 거래 70개 확보 1. 스파이노드 함대로 브로드캐스트 IP 상시 수집 2. 그 70개를 디코이 소거 + co-spend로 forward 추적 3. 추적 도중, 타겟이 체이널리시스의 노드로 broadcast한 실수로 발신자 clean IP 포착 ← OPSEC 실패지점 4. 그 IP를 Reactor에 투입 → 중앙화 엔티티 2곳으로 연결 5. 신원 확보 의 과…
2/ 왜 추적할 수 없을까? - Decoy들이 섞여있음 다들 RingCT라는 말은 한 번씩 들어보셨을 것 같긴한데요, 저 중에 진짜는 1개밖에 없다 정도로 인식을 하시면 될 것 같아요 따라서 안그래도 주소를 읽지도 못하는데 어떤 Output이 실제로 소비된 것인지도 모른다는게 굉장히 큰 난독화 포인트라고 볼 수 있을 것 같아요
1/ 왜 추적할 수 없을까? - 주소가 안보임 간단하게 이야기하면 체인을 조회했을 때는 그 무엇도 알 수가 없어요 트랜잭션을 검색했을 때 나오는 정보들이 다른 체인들과 다르게 모두 일회용이에요 ECDH라는 것을 통해 만들었고 그 안전성은 ECDLP에 의존한다라고 말을 할 수 있는데 간단하게 생각해서 '저 주소가 뭔지 알고 싶다'의 난이도= '특정 EVM 주소의 pk를 알고 싶다'의 난이도 라고 생각하면 이해가 쉬울 것 같아요
모네로는 정말로 추적이 불가능할까? 일반적으로 모네로는 1) 추적이 안된다는 이유로 다양한 거래소에서 퇴출이 되거나 2) 상승장의 끝물에 오른다는 다크 코인 메타의 주인공이 되는 등 '추적할 수 없는 대상'으로 인식이 되고 있는데요, 그렇다면 왜 추적할 수 없는지, 관련된 사건을 다룰 때는 어떻게 접근하는지에 대해서 한 번 알아보면 좋을 것 같아서 간단하게 적어보는 글!
❤2
2년이나 방치되어있엇다고 하네요....
❤1
Taiko Exploit건은 SGX key를 깃허브에 올렸기 때문에 발생한 것이었네요 ㅋㅋ 아이고 두야 자세한 내용은 여기서
대부분 AI로 전환하는 그런 느낌... Certik에서도 AI Auditor를 고도화하기 위해 피드백도 받고 최선을 다하고 있는 것 같더라구요 (소정의 마음은 크레딧으로 보상해주는게 별로 마음에 안들긴함ㅋㅋ) 앞으로 정말 많은 변화가 있겠네요 인간 시대의 끝이 도래했다...
Certora 대규모 구조조정. 정형검증 오딧으로 가장 유명한 곳 중 하나인데, 에이전트 기반 정형검증으로 전환한다고 연구원들을 대부분 해고한 것 같네요. 정형검증도 탑티어 팀 아니면 맡기는 곳이 별로 없어서 사업성이 안좋을 것 같긴 함.. https://x.com/pashov/status/2067527977227743535?s=20
❤1
엇 저 때 열렸구나 1등상 수상하신 0xb6f89d12Ff9A9e394f40B701Ac46428DE0d1bEa5님 축하드립니다!
❤1
이거 취약점 살아있음 25343760블록때 누가누가 먼저가져가냐 대회 진행될 예정 ㅋㅋ
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @NEETCCT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 665,936 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“고졸무직백수롱숏딸깍도박충은 어떤 생각을 가지고 행동할까?” (@NEETCCT), 738 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEETCCT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.