Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Do you believe in life after surviving in Mariupol?

@MyVujili

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

67subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002521365809
TypeChannel
Username@MyVujili
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 1 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MyVujili

Growth

677 August 2026 — 67 subscribers10 August 2026 — 67 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:3067no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:3167first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
5
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
50s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

300 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6822.7%
6722.3%
🥰4113.7%
😁258.33%
👏248.00%
💯217.00%
🙏186.00%
👍144.67%
🎉93.00%
😱72.33%
👀41.33%
🤗10.333%
🤯10.333%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 16:01 UTC390 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вот что такое идеальная семейная жизнь! 🧐

🥰20😁73🤗1

1 Jun 2025, 14:46 UTC365 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

У меня начинает закрадываться мысль, что эта операция — многоходовочка. Атаки на Москву дронами —> россиянам захотелось возмездия —> стянули всю авиацию на несколько аэродромов —> дроны СБУ атакуют аэродромы

12😁3

1 Jun 2025, 14:37 UTC270 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Очень, очень хорошо, что уебали ядерную подлодку 😊

🔥172

1 Jun 2025, 14:31 UTC258 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @uniannetPhoto

Руснявые военкоры предполагают поражение стратегического подводного атомного крейсера (подлодки с межконтинентальными баллистическими ракетами с ядерными боеголовкам)

🔥102

1 Jun 2025, 14:26 UTC238 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yigal_levin

Кстати, это ведь чистой воды киберпанковский сеттинг, где-то в глубине порядков врага стаи, если не рои дронов, неожиданно поднимаются из фур и наносят удар. Системы взламывают нетраннеры, операторы эти дроны ведут, а со стороны врага — охуевшие солдаты из прошлого века и селюки, которые лезут в эти самые взрывающиеся фуры. Еще всякие ИИ, доразведка, работа фиксеров и прокладок, агентуры и другой киберкек — этот са

🔥112

1 Jun 2025, 14:18 UTC178 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Наши невинные самолёты с глазами Иисуса пострадали они же ничего такого не делали не виноваты это Путин стреляют не самолёты Господи что происходит это недоговороспособная Украина опять нанесла удар в спину братскому народу который ничего плохого им не сделал

😁151🤯1

1 Jun 2025, 14:07 UTC183 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @insiderukr

1 июня 1996 года: Украина отдала России стратегические бомбардировщики. 1 июня 2025 года Украина забрала у России стратегические бомбардировщики. Слава Украине. И слава СБУ. Подписаться на Инсайдер | Прислать контент

11🎉5🔥3

1 Jun 2025, 13:21 UTC173 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пишут, что среди сгоревших Ту-22 были борта, бомбившие Мариуполь. 🙄

🙏183

1 Jun 2025, 12:31 UTC163 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukrbavovnaVideo

18+ Знайдений водій фури, задушений. На шиї видно стяжку.

😱7

1 Jun 2025, 12:13 UTC147 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukrbavovnaVideo

Росіяни повідомляють про сильний вибух у Сєвєроморську, де знаходяться підводні човни з ядерною зброєю.

🔥132

1 Jun 2025, 12:13 UTC150 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @roman_popkov

Это важно зафиксировать для понимания публики. РФ не способна массово производить стратегические бомбардировщики. Так как РФ, не смотря на свою "имперскую" и мессианскую риторику - технологически отсталое, варварское (в плохом смысле слова) государство. Не империя, не сверхдержава. Это просто темная деспотическая клептократия. Но, к сожалению, имеет возможность бряцать военным имуществом, доставшимся от подлинной, уж

🥰92👍2💯1

1 Jun 2025, 12:09 UTC154 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вооооот! Это идеальное решение!

🔥132

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MyVujili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Do you believe in life after surviving in Mariupol?” (@MyVujili), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyVujili.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.