Channel
@MuhammadAlush0997
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25,056subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001799062880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MuhammadAlush0997 |
| Description | في عالم مليء بالثغرات…مهمتي أكون خط الدفاع الأول 🔐 مهندس برمجيات & أمن سيبراني، مؤسس موقع نسور التقنية حسابي على منصة إكس: https://x.com/MhamadAlush0997 |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MuhammadAlush0997 |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 25,056 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 25,081 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 25,094 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 25,108 | -35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 25,143 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 25,166 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 25,176 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (15 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,126 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 75.0% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
5 إعدادات تساعد على إطالة عمر بطارية هاتفك تُعد بطارية الهاتف من أكثر المكونات التي تتأثر بالاستخدام اليومي، ومع مرور الوقت قد تلاحظ انخفاضًا تدريجيًا في قدرتها على الاحتفاظ بالشحن. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/settings-that-help-extend-your-phone-battery-life.html
كيف تستعيد صور WhatsApp المحذوفة؟ في بعض الحالات يمكن العثور عليها في معرض الهاتف، أو سلة المحذوفات، أو Google Photos، أو مجلد WhatsApp، أو استعادتها من نسخة احتياطية سابقة. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/how-do-you-recover-deleted-whatsapp-photos.html
❤1
طرق الاحتيال الأكثر شيوعاً التي تستهدف مستخدمي #شام_كاش Sham Cash وفيما يلي #أشهر_الأساليب التي يمكن أن يتعرض لها مستخدمو شام كاش، مع أمثلة توضيحية تحاكي الأساليب الواقعية التي يستخدمها #المحتالون. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 طرق الاحتيال الأكثر شيوعاً التي تستهدف مستخدمي #شام_كاش Sham Cash وفيما يلي #أشهر_الأساليب التي يمكن أن يتعرض لها مستخدمو شام كاش، مع أمثلة توضيحية تحاكي الأساليب الواقعية التي يستخدمها #المحتالو…
أشهر أساليب #الاختراق والاحتيال المرتبطة بتطبيق بنكك أصبحت الخدمات #المصرفية الإلكترونية جزءاً أساسياً من الحياة اليومية، وأصبح تطبيق بنكك وسيلة رئيسية للتحويلات ودفع الخدمات ومتابعة الحسابات. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/most-common-hacking-and-fraud-methods.html
🥰1
افضل 12 #علامة تحمي هاتفك من #التطبيقات_الخبيثة اكتشف أهم علامات التطبيقات #غير_الآمنة قبل تثبيتها، وتعرّف على طرق حماية هاتفك وبياناتك من التطبيقات الخبيثة والمشبوهة. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/how-to-know-if-an-app-is-unsafe.html
دليل شامل لعام عن #التداول 2026 التداول هو #عملية_شراء وبيع الأصول #المالية بهدف تحقيق #الربح من تغير أسعارها. ويختلف عن #الاستثمار في أن المتداول غالبًا ما يحتفظ بالأصل لفترة قصيرة أو متوسطة، بينما يميل المستثمر إلى الاحتفاظ باستثماراته لسنوات. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/what-is-trading.html
كيف تعرف أن هاتفك مخترق ؟ 12 علامة تدل على اختراق هاتفك هل تشك أن هاتفك مخترق؟ تعرّف على 12 علامة قد تشير إلى وجود اختراق، مثل استنزاف البطارية، بطء الأداء، ظهور تطبيقات مجهولة، وطرق التحقق من سلامة جهازك وحماية بياناتك. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/how-to-know-if-your-phone-has-been-hacked.html
أخطاء يجب تجنبها عند #تطوير #مواقع_الويب يقع الكثير من #المطورين ، خاصة في بداية مسيرتهم، في #أخطاء تؤثر سلبًا على جودة #الموقع وتجربة المستخدم، مما يؤدي إلى انخفاض عدد الزوار أو زيادة معدل مغادرة الموقع. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/mistakes-to-avoid-when-developing-websites.html
❤1
تطبيق نتائج البكالوريا… أم دورة مكثفة في اكتشاف أخطاء البرمجة؟ 😅 من المفترض أن يكون إطلاق تطبيق رسمي لنتائج آلاف الطلاب حدثاً تقنياً مدروساً، لكن الصور الظاهرة قدّمت لنا بدلاً من النتائج معرضاً متنوعاً من أخطاء الـBackend والـAPI والـFlutter وCloudflare، وكل خطأ معروض للمستخدم بكامل أناقته التقنية… من دون ترجمة أو معالجة! خلونا نفهم علمياً ماذا حدث: 🔴 type 'Null' is not a subtype of type 'String' هذا خطأ شائع في …
🤣4❤2
أشهر طرق اختراق #الحسابات وكيف تحمي نفسك أصبحت #الحسابات_الرقمية هدفًا رئيسيًا للمهاجمين الإلكترونيين. وغالبًا لا يعتمد #نجاح_الاختراق على مهارات تقنية خارقة، بل على #استغلال_أخطاء_المستخدمين أو #ثغرات_أمنية بسيطة. 🔴 رابط المقال كاملاً : 🔴🔴 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/08/the-most-common-methods-for-hacking-accounts.html
نتائج البكالوريا في سوريا 2026 https://www.nusurtech.ca/2026/07/baccalaureate-results-in-syria-2026.html
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @MuhammadAlush0997. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 42,519 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muhammad Alush” (@MuhammadAlush0997), 25,056 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuhammadAlush0997.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.