Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,049–1,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:21
1,085
+7
15 Sept 2026, 03:37
1,078
+3
11 Sept 2026, 17:58
1,075
-6
7 Sept 2026, 04:58
1,081
+13
2 Sept 2026, 10:24
1,068
-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:58
1,071
+13
27 Aug 2026, 23:11
1,058
+4
24 Aug 2026, 20:07
1,054
-2
20 Aug 2026, 19:23
1,056
-4
17 Aug 2026, 10:42
1,060
-2
14 Aug 2026, 03:26
1,062
-6
11 Aug 2026, 00:26
1,068
-10
8 Aug 2026, 07:54
1,078
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:06
1,079
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:49
1,079
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
55s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
668 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
293
43.9%
👍
153
22.9%
🔥
116
17.4%
😁
82
12.3%
👏
15
2.25%
😢
3
0.449%
🤔
3
0.449%
🥰
3
0.449%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arofat_sheraliyeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟢Javobni to'g'ri topdingizmi? Tabriklaymiz!
Ibn Sino filialimiz uchun professional boshlang'ich sinf ustozlarini saralamoqdamiz!
🟢 Ish vaqti: 08:30–17:00, 5/2
🟢 Oylik maosh: 14.000.000 - 15.000.000 so’m
🟢 Biz sizga nimalarni taklif qilamiz:
Rasmiy faoliyat: Mehnat kodeksiga muvofiq to‘liq shartnoma va kafolatlangan ta’til.
Barqarorlik: Oyda 2 marta maosh olish (avans va oylik).
O'sish: Har o'quv yili oshirib bor…
Yangi post yozishga qo‘rqaman.
Chunki har bir yangi fikr bilan kimdir ketadi. Albatta, yangilar ham qo‘shiladi. Ammo negadir aynan ketganlar ko‘proq e’tiborimni tortadi.
Aslida esa har bir post mening yangi qirramni ochadi. U qirra kimningdir kutuvlariga mos kelmasligi mumkin. Shunda u o‘ziga boshqa manzil tanlaydi.
Darslarda ham xuddi shunday: har bir mashg‘ulot — yangi tavakkal va yangi imkoniyat. Kimdir sizga y…
Men nonga borardim.
Har safar kuchuklarga duch kelardim. Qattiq akillashardi — go‘yo zarar bermoqchi bo‘lishardi.
Uy egalariga aytib jilovlatay desam, g‘ururim yo‘l qo‘ymadi. “Qiladimi-yo‘qmi?” dedim.
Kuchuklar o‘quvchim bo‘lmasa ham, ular bilan chiqisha olmayotganimni tan olish qiyin edi.
Uray desam — bu bilan baribir ularni hayotimdan butunlay chiqarib yubora olmasdim. Faqat oqibati noma’lum jang boshlanardi, x…
O‘smirlarni qo‘rquv orqali itoatga solsa bo‘ladimi?
Itoatning ikki turi bor: sevgiga asoslangan ko‘ngilli itoat va qo‘rquvga asoslangan majburiy itoat.
Majburiy itoatda qo‘rquv yo‘qolishi bilan o‘rtadagi bog‘liqlik ham tugaydi.
Ko‘pincha qo‘rquv yo‘qolishi uchun nazoratchining ko‘zidan nari bo‘lish yoki qilmishni yolg‘on bilan yashirish imkonining paydo bo‘lishi kifoya.
O‘smirni esa doim bag‘rimizda olib yurolmay…
Boshlang‘ich sinf o‘qituvchilari nomidan
ATTESTATSIYA JARAYONIGA NOROZILIK XATI
Hurmatli mas’ul tashkilot rahbarlari!
Biz, boshlang‘ich sinf o‘qituvchilari, so‘nggi o‘tkazilgan attestatsiya jarayonlari yuzasidan o‘z qat’iy noroziligimizni bildiramiz.
Avvalo, attestatsiya savollari mazmuni va darajasi boshlang‘ich ta’lim bosqichiga mos kelmayotganini alohida ta’kidlamoqchimiz. Matematika va tabiiy fanlar bo‘yicha b…
Eng "yaramas" o‘smirlar auditoriyasiga ham ishlaydigan usullar:
Eng yaqin vaqtda sinab ko‘rganim — ishlashiga o‘zim ham ishonmagan (🤭), ammo samara bergan usullar bilan tanishing.
1. Pachakilashmaslik
Kech qolgan o‘quvchiga tezroq o‘z joyini egallab, darsga kirishib ketishi mumkinligini aytdim. “Tarbiyaviy ishlar”ni dars yakuniga qoldirdim.
2. Ehtiyojini berish orqali zararsizlantirish
Bir o‘quvchi jig‘imga tegish…
O’ta og’riqli mavzu!
Ushbu insonni shaxsiy fikrlarini hurmat qilgan holda, fikrlariga qarshi fikrlarim:
1. Biz millat o’laroq tayoq yeb haliham odam bo’lmadik. “Ho’p bo’ladi boshliq” deydigan, nimaga deydigan savolni berishdan qo’rqadigan jamiyatmizku haliham.
2. Biz millat o’laroq tayoq yeb haliham odam bo’lmadik. Haliham qo’rqamiz-ku… Ishimizni yo’qotishdan, lavozimizni yo’qotishdan, odamlar nima deyishidan…
3.…
Men ishlashni istamayapman...
Ba’zan ishimizdan olayotgan daromadimiz unga sarflayotgan energiya va resurslarimizni qayta tiklashga yetmaydi.
Shunda o‘zimizga deymiz:
"Hozircha boshqa iloj yo‘q, chidab turaylik..."
Va yelkangizga katta bir toshni ortib, yo‘lda zo‘rg‘a davom etasiz.
Bu holatda sizni turtgan, qitiqlagan, chalgan, oyog‘ingiz tagida o‘ralashgan hamma — "dushman".
Chunki siz allaqachon oxirgi kuchingi…
"O‘g‘il bola yig‘lamaydi!"
Azizlar, bolaning yig‘lashi — bu isyon. Eng ojiz, eng beg‘ubor himoya usuli.
Hali tuyg‘ularini va e’tirozlarini so‘z bilan ifodalay olmaydigan bolalarga hech bo‘lmasa yig‘lashlariga imkon bering.
Yig‘lashni ham cheklab, jur’atini sindirmang.
Kattalarning yig‘lashi ojizlik bo‘lishi mumkindir. Ammo bolalarniki emas.
Avval buni qabul qiling.
Va asta-sekin, yig‘lash o‘rniga hislarini gapiri…
Ota-onalar maktabi loyihamizning 1-podkastini syomka qildik.
Mavzu: Ta’lim-tarbiyada rag’bat va jazo balansi haqida bo’ldi.
Rossa 3 soatdan ortiq suhbatlashdik. Ishonamanki, yaxshi ota-ona bo’laman deb niyat qilganlar uchun manfaatli bo’ladi.
@sardorsodikov
👍17❤9🔥3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @arofat_sheraliyeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arofat malim | Ta’limning Nigorasi” (@arofat_sheraliyeva), 1,085 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arofat_sheraliyeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.