Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Money Tree Work

@Money_Tree_Work

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

570subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109279597
TypeChannel
Username@Money_Tree_Work
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Money_Tree_Work

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Money_Tree_Work/4076 · this entry28 Apr 2026, 08:02 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/486528 Apr 2026, 08:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@Money_Tree_Work/4078 · this entry29 Apr 2026, 08:57 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/486729 Apr 2026, 08:57 UTC1.00under a minute
@Money_Tree_Work/4080 · this entry30 Apr 2026, 08:05 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/486930 Apr 2026, 08:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@Money_Tree_Work/4082 · this entry1 May 2026, 08:14 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/48711 May 2026, 08:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@Money_Tree_Work/4084 · this entry6 May 2026, 08:53 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/48736 May 2026, 08:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@Money_Tree_Work/4086 · this entry8 May 2026, 07:57 UTC@Fairy_PR_Work/48758 May 2026, 07:57 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Fairy_PR_Work9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Fairy_PR_Work (90)
@MoneyMagicPR_work8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (71)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 April 2026 to 14 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Money_Tree_Work — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5706 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 570 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:47 — 570 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:037 Aug 2026, 12:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 569–571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:47570no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03570first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

14 May 2026, 09:17 UTC96 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Вас упомянул администратор бота Вы выиграли - 130.000 RUB Именно такие сообщения получают участники розыгрыша от Wildberries и OZON и Вам доступно 3 БЕСПЛАТНЫХ ПОПЫТКИ выиграть приз 🎁 ИНСТРУКЦИЯ — Как принять участие в розыгрыше? 1. Нажмите на кнопку Участвовать 2. Получите свой билет. 3. Используйте 3 бесплатных попытки. 4. Получите свой выигрыш через оператора. Участвуй и выигрывай в большом розыгрыше о

14 May 2026, 09:17 UTC225 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для начисления нажмите на кнопку:

13 May 2026, 09:33 UTC51 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

По 5000₽ за каждый отзыв — и это без ограничений. 📲 По вашему ID: 63848 прямо сейчас доступно 3 отзыва 👉 это 15000₽ наличкой! ⏳ Кол-во мест ограничено, разберут за часы! Жмите на ссылку и забирайте деньги пока доступно 👇 Откликнуться

13 May 2026, 09:33 UTC136 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для начисления нажмите на кнопку:

12 May 2026, 17:50 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Листать фото три часа в день. З/П 90.000₽ ☁️ ПРОВЕРЕНО Платим за проверку фото — Нужно листать и оценивать фото. • Подойдет и для школьника и для мамы в декрете. • Можно работать с телефона. • Доступно 7200 фото. 💳 Деньги выводятся мгновенно - от 1₽

8 May 2026, 07:57 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅ +59 808₽ — я получила за 998 кликов Бот платит по 50₽ за каждый клик, кликнул 20 раз и уже 1000₽ в кармане 💳Просто кликай по кнопке и выводи деньги каждую минуту 5 минут покликал и на работу можно не ходить Начать зaрабатывать — КЛИК

8 May 2026, 07:57 UTC103 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для начисления нажмите на кнопку:

6 May 2026, 08:53 UTC28 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❌ - Заебался быть нищим? - Дохуя ŧим обещали ебнутый доход, а на деле ты заработал ебаные гроши? Сейчас мы проводим ограниченный донабор в ряды нашей ŧимы по P2P TRADE, только у нас: 1️⃣ Первый профит с вероятностью 90% в первый день 2️⃣ Профиты от 5к до 150к 3️⃣ Очень понятный и легкий вøрƙ 4️⃣ От тебя требуется только аккаунт тг и 2-3 часа в день 🤑Хочешь делать 10-30к рублей в день уже впервые дни вøрƙа

6 May 2026, 08:53 UTC103 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для начисления нажмите на кнопку:

1 May 2026, 08:14 UTC37 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎉 Получай каждую минуту 175₽ 📱 Заработок с телефона, все легко разберется даже новичек! 💳 Вывод на: СБЕР, Т-банк, Альфа 💸 Заработок день: 3000-5000₽ ✅ Начать можно сейчас (КЛИК) Переходи для подключения

1 May 2026, 08:14 UTC127 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для начисления нажмите на кнопку:

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Money_Tree_Work. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,023,970 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Money Tree Work” (@Money_Tree_Work), 570 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Money_Tree_Work.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.