Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for د. معاذ صفوت

Channel

د. معاذ صفوت

@MoaathTelegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,193subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001001656890
TypeChannel
Username@MoaathTelegram
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MoaathTelegram

Growth

4,1904,1984,19423 August 2026 — 4,190 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,192 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,190 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,198 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,193 subscribers4,19323 August 20263 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,189–4,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 13:404,193-5
30 Aug 2026, 23:144,198+8
27 Aug 2026, 12:344,190-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:134,192+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:304,190first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 4,193 subscribers
Avg views / post
633
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 June 202619 August 2026)
Views total1,900
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

572 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44978.5%
🤝12221.3%
👎10.175%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 572 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
44
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MoaathTelegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC492 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

رابط منشوري الذي أشرت إليه.

👍4

19 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC509 views17 reactionsread 23 August 2026

خاطرة كنت قد كتبت قديمًا مذهبي، وإن شئت فقل: نصيحتي لإخواني من القراء وطلاب علم القراءة، من عدم استعمال وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي لمناقشة المسائل العلمية المتخصصة، مهما كانت الضرورة، والاكتفاء بطرح ما يصلح أن يخاطب به كافة المسلمين. مهما كانت الفائدة المرجوة من طرح أي مسألة متخصصة، فالضرر الواقع من ورائها أشد وأخطر، ولا علاج له، ولا يوقِف كوارثه إلا الله، ومَن لاحظَ وشاهَد ما يتداوله مرتادو مواقع التواصل من أفكار، ومن

👍17

13 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC899 views17 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @D_alghamdi

مِنْ فَوَائِدِ شَيْخِنَا عَلِيِّ بْنِ سَعْدٍ الْغَامِدِيِّ الْمَكِّيِّ فِي مَجَالِسِ الْإِقْرَاءِ (٢٢): مِنْ فَوَائِدِ الْإِجَازَةِ: جَبْرُ نَقْصِ الْقِرَاءَةِ وَالسَّمَاعِ. ​وَلَا يَكَادُ يَسْلَمُ أَحَدٌ مِنْ نَقْصٍ فِي مُطَوَّلَاتِهِمَا؛ كَالْقِرَاءَاتِ إِذَا جُمِعَتْ. وَمِنْ أَسْبَابِ نَقْصِ الْقِرَاءَةِ وَالسَّمَاعِ: • غَلَطٌ مِنَ الْقَارِئِ لَمْ يُصَحِّحْهُ الشَّيْخُ. • وَنَوْمٌ أَوْ غَفْلَةٌ عَنِ الْمَقْرُوء

👍17

5 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,390 views77 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

الحمد لله دائمًا. صحتي القلبية لم تستقر بعد منذ عمليتي القلبية مؤخرًا، وأحتاج دعوات المحبين وأهل القرآن، لأني أنتفع بها وألاحظ أثرها المبارك. ولا تستهينوا بدعوة صالحة فإن الله هو مقلب الأمور، ومقدر الأقدار، واللجوء إليه يسبق الأسباب ويتبعها.

👍57🤝20

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,520 views32 reactionsread 23 August 2026

اللهم لطفك بأهل بلدي خاصة وبالمسلمين عامة. لا يزال الله لطيفًا بعباده، يأخذ بأيديهم إليه، ويردهم إلى رحابه تارة برسائل لأفرادهم، وتارة لجموعهم، والزلازل خوف ورهبة، والعاقل من يفهم رسالة ربه ويرتدع ويؤوب، والغافل يخرج عن وصف الغفلة بإفاقته وتوبته، ونسأل الله العفو والعافية، في الدين والدنيا والآخرة. ولا يغرنكم من غفل عن الله، وعدّ الزلازل ظواهر طبيعية عادية، وتأثر قلبه بما يردده الملاحدة وعباد أهوائهم، فإن رسول الله

👍27🤝5

20 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC≈1,980 views48 reactionsread 23 August 2026

لا شك أن الإبداع الفكري حق لصاحبه في العصر الحديث، ودرج العلماء في القديم على أن من بركة العلم أن ينسب إلى صاحبه. وكان العلماء ينقل بعضهم من بعض، إما بعزو وإما بغيره، اعتمادًا على شهرة الكلام وشهرة صاحبه الحقيقي عند أهل الصنعة، أو هربًا من تبعات سياسية أو ضغوطات اجتماعية ناشئة عن الانتساب لذلك المنقول عنه. لكني أجد أن زماننا هذا قد بالغ في حقوق الملكية الفكرية، وهو أثر من آثار الرأسمالية، بحيث إن الفكرة رأس مال، قد

👍39🤝9

18 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,680 views53 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

شكر الله لكم أيها الفضلاء رسائلكم الكريمة ودعواتكم الطيبة، سامحوني لعدم القدرة على العودة بالرد لكل فرد ممن تواصل معي حتى أستعيد صحتي بإذن الله. حدثت بعض التطورات أمس استدعت بقائي في المستشفى، ونسأل الله تعالى أن تتحسن الأرقام اليوم ويزول البأس ويتيسر الخروج. دعواتكم الصالحة.

🤝31👍22

16 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC≈1,990 views91 reactionsread 23 August 2026

جزاكم الله خيرًا على دعواتكم، تمت العملية على خير وكانت ضرورية فلله الحمد والمنة.

👍79🤝12

16 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC≈2,310 views79 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

ستجرى لي بعد قليل بإذن الله قسطرة قلبية، أرجو منكم الدعاء باللطف وتمام العافية من كل بلية، وأسأل الله أن يحفظكم جميعًا بحفظه ويرعاكم.

🤝45👍34

15 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈2,170 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026

https://youtu.be/2yWS7y6gRu0?si=KL0ULpYXQhF6nwT6

👍3

5 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC≈2,100 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahmed_aboal3olaVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍20👎1

5 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC≈2,270 views10 reactionsread 23 August 2026

هذه النصيحة العظيمة يحسُن أن تكتب نصيا، وأن تترجم كذلك للإنجليزية؛ لأنها خرجت من عالم حاذق، وأستاذ خبير، وممارس قديم لوسائل التواصل وغيرها. جزى الله خيرًا من اجتهد في ذلك، وكتب الأجر لشيخنا الحبيب، حفظه الله للعلم وأهله.

👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MoaathTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

صناعة حفّاظ القرآن - د.سعيد حمزة
@saidhamza2023 · 32,620
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
د . أيمن سويد | Dr . Ayman Swaid
@Ayman_Swaid · 54,724
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
برنامج الراسخات في تعلم القراءات📚إيمان بنت صبحي إدلبي
@imanidlibi · 31,573
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“د. معاذ صفوت” (@MoaathTelegram), 4,193 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoaathTelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.