کانال لایمون📥⬇️📥 https://t.me/Safebet_Live 😇 کانال میکس مطمئن📥⬇️📥 https://t.me/Mix_Safe2 🤩 کانال فرمای تکی بیشتر https://t.me/miix_viip2 🤩 #AR8
❤6

Channel
@Mix_Safe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,011subscribers
+7,471 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001526017914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mix_Safe |
| Description | 💌💎کد هدیه وانیکس F16F @One1xbit_bot ربات وانیکس @UCLVIP_BOT ربات فرم دهی 𖤹حفظ سرمایه بزرگترین برد تو شرطبندی𖤹 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mix_Safe |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 22,011 | -141 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 22,152 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 22,164 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 22,186 | -1,544 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 23,730 | -7,757 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 31,487 | +16,350 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 15,137 | +7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 15,130 | +15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 15,115 | +15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:44 | 15,100 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 15,103 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 15,079 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 15,078 | +12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 15,066 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 15,070 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 15,057 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 15,043 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 15,050 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 15,036 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 15,044 | first reading |
211 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 211 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 111,240 |
| Reactions total | 1,876 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5,234 reactions across 208 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,756 | 71.8% | |
| 🔥 | 488 | 9.32% | |
| 💔 | 426 | 8.14% | |
| 👍 | 222 | 4.24% | |
| 😍 | 97 | 1.85% | |
| 😁 | 67 | 1.28% | |
| 🆒 | 56 | 1.07% | |
| 🏆 | 30 | 0.573% | |
| 😘 | 24 | 0.459% | |
| 🤯 | 21 | 0.401% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 0.382% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 0.325% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.115% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.057% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.019% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کانال لایمون📥⬇️📥 https://t.me/Safebet_Live 😇 کانال میکس مطمئن📥⬇️📥 https://t.me/Mix_Safe2 🤩 کانال فرمای تکی بیشتر https://t.me/miix_viip2 🤩 #AR8
❤6
🤩 آپدیت رسمی وانیکس 🤩 سایت مورد تایید ما ✅ ❤️کانال رسمی 🟫 @OnExBeT_irApk بهترین سایت فعال در ایران 🔥 @One1xbit_bot ◀️⚽️⚽️⚽️
❤3
👑𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏 💠 اروپا 🏆 😎کد #وانیکس :LCQQ5 🚩بیشتر از ۴.۵ ضربه دروازه اسلواکی 🚩 📊📊 آنالیز : ⚽️ اسلواکی 🇸🇰 - مولداوی 🇲🇩 🎯 بیشتر از 4.5 ضربه دروازه اسلواکی 💵 ضریب: 1.49 📊 آمار مهم: ضربه دروازه اسلواکی در بازیهای خانگی اخیر: 🇲🇪 مونتهنگرو: 7 ✅ 🇲🇹 مالت: 9 ✅ 🇷🇴 رومانی: 9 ✅ 🇽🇰 کوزوو: 4 ❌ 🇬🇧 ایرلند شمالی: 9 ✅ 🇱🇺 لوکزامبورگ: 9 ✅ 🇩🇪 آلمان: 10 ✅ یعنی این خط در 6 بازی از 7 بازی خانگی مورد بررسی اسلواکی عبور کرده و میانگین …
❤8
👑𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏 💠 اروپا 🏆 😎کد #وانیکس :5J5N5 🚩بیشتر از 11.5 خطای جمهوری چک🚩 📊📊 آنالیز : ⚽️ جمهوری چک 🇨🇿 - کرواسی 🇭🇷 🎯 بیشتر از 11.5 خطای جمهوری چک 📊 تحلیل: این لاین برای جمهوری چک قابل بررسیه، چون مقابل کرواسی معمولاً بازی فیزیکیتری پیدا میکنه. در دو تقابل قبلی دو تیم در مقدماتی جام جهانی، چک بهترتیب 11 و 15 خطا ثبت کرده؛ یعنی یک بار فقط نیمخط با این لاین فاصله داشته و بازی دیگر کاملاً از آن عبور کرده است. 0 ک…
❤9
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀 اروپا 🏆 بیشتر از 12.5 یا 13 خطای بلاروس🚩 😎کد #وانیکس : JQ6TJ آنالیز : 📈📉 ⚽️ آلبانی 🇦🇱 - بلاروس 🇧🇾 🎯 بیشتر از 12.5 خطای بلاروس 💵 ضریب: 1.39 📊 تحلیل: این گزینه از آن بازارهایی است که بیشتر از هر چیز به سناریوی بازی وابسته است و سناریوی این مسابقه هم تا حد زیادی به نفع این آپشن دیده میشود. بلاروس در این بازی تیم میهمان است و از نظر فنی هم احتمالاً دقایق بیشتری بدون توپ خواهد بود؛ همین موضوع معمولاً تعداد درگ…
❤7🎉1
سلام رفقا یکی از بچه ها گپ زده تو کار vpn اگه خواستین میتونید باهاش کار کنید مزیت هاش اینه : 🇷🇺سرور روسیه داره میتونید تو اپ وانیکس (نسخه جهانی ) اکثر بازیا رو ببینید 🎉اگه بگید از بچه های چنل یا گپ هستین بهتون 50 درصد تخفیف میده رو حجم نامحدود همین که آشناس از قبل میشناسیمش و یه کمکی براش ❤️✅ Channel : @Silent_V2ray ID : @IN_SIDE0
❤14👍1💔1🔥1
═════════════ ⚡ VPN آیپی ثابت ⚡️ 🚀 پر سرعت | بدون قطعی ════════════════ 🔒 امنیت و رمزنگاری واقعی 🌐 مناسب تمامی اپراتورها ⭐️ مولتی لوکیشن و تک لوکیشن ⚡️ سرعت و کیفیت عالی 🛡️ ثبات و پایداری بالا و بدون افت کیفیت ✅ ضمانت تا روز پایانی اشتراک 📍 آیپی ثابت ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 10 گیگ یک ماهه ➜ 60 20 گیگ بک ماهه ➜ 120 30 گیگ یک ماهه ➜ 180 نامحدود یک ماهه ( تک کاربر ) ➜ 245 نامحدود یک ماهه ( دو کاربر ) ➜ 295 …
👍3❤2💔2🏆1
سلام رفقا روز خوش #AR8 @Mix_Safe
❤18😍2
یعنی لواندوفسکی تنهایی داشت فرم رو لوز میکرد 87 دقیقه بازی کرد یه شوت نزد بی پدر 1.54 ✅✅✅✅
❤32😁10
🤩 آپدیت رسمی وانیکس 🤩 سایت مورد تایید ما ✅ ❤️کانال رسمی 🟫 @OnExBeT_irApk بهترین سایت فعال در ایران 🔥 @One1xbit_bot ◀️⚽️⚽️⚽️
❤7
👑𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏 💠 اروپا 🏆 😎کد #وانیکس :Y2T1M 🚩 بیشتر از 13.5 شوت لهستان 📊📊 آنالیز : 🇵🇱 لهستان – بوسنی و هرزگوین 🎯 آپشن: بیشتر از 13.5 شوت لهستان لهستان در بازیهای اخیر میانگین حدود 14.5 شوت داشته و مقابل تیمهایی که عقبتر بازی میکنند معمولاً حجم حملاتش بالاتر میرود. نکته مهم اینجاست که لهستان حتی مقابل هلند 12 شوت ثبت کرده؛ بنابراین مقابل بوسنی، آن هم در خانه، رسیدن به حداقل 14 شوت کاملاً در دسترس به نظر میرسد…
❤24😍2👍1
تو این چنل که لینکشو گذاشتم سعی میکنم میکس ضریب بالا بدم روزایی که بازی هست حتما عضو بشید
❤18😍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @Mix_Safe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Mix_Safe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
این بخش آنالیز که برای فرما میدیم به دردتون میخوره ؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔰𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏🔰” (@Mix_Safe), 22,011 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mix_Safe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.