Channel
@MediacatCat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
381subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001334783007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MediacatCat |
| Description | Mèdia.cat és l’Observatori Crític dels Mitjans impulsat pel Grup de Periodistes Ramon Barnils que analitza els mitjans de comunicació que operen en la nostra àrea idiomàtica. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MediacatCat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 381 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 381 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,027 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 77.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bon dia, Us deixem els 20 articles més llegits de Mèdia.cat aquest 2026 (fins ara). Abans de la pausa d'agost, recuperem els continguts que més interès han despertat aquest any: reportatges, entrevistes, anàlisis i opinions sobre l'extrema dreta, la llibertat de premsa, la llengua, els abusos de poder, les condicions del periodisme i molts altres debats que han marcat l'actualitat però també l'hemeroteca. Algunes r…
Video message, posted without a caption
Un mapa contra l’oblit El 2023, la Directa va revelar que agents de policia espanyola s’havien infiltrat durant anys en moviments socials i havien establert relacions íntimes amb activistes com a part del seu espionatge. Al Regne Unit, davant d’un cas similar, el govern va demanar perdó i va indemnitzar les víctimes. Però, per l’Estat espanyol, el problema és que algú ho hagi explicat i per això ara l'Agència Espany…
Bon dia, ANUARI | Les esquerdes d'informar sobre el turisme Com expliquen els mitjans la massificació turística? Un recorregut pels titulars, les dades i les veus que acaben configurant el relat públic sobre un dels grans debats del nostre temps. ✍️ Un reportatge de Laura Noya a l'Anuari Mèdia.cat 2025 - 2026 https://www.media.cat/2026/07/31/les-esquerdes-dinformar-sobre-el-turisme/
Bon dia, L’actuació de l’Agència Espanyola de Protecció de Dades contra les investigacions de la Directa, que va revelar infiltracions policials, s’estén a més capçaleres. VilaWeb afronta una proposta de multa d’almenys 7.000 euros i la retirada de diversos articles sobre una agent infiltrada a Girona i Salt. El Salto també ha rebut un requeriment d’informació pel mateix cas, tot i que el seu procediment es troba e…
❤3
Bon dia, L’Agència Espanyola de Protecció de Dades proposa multar la Directa amb 7.000 euros i li exigeix retirar o ocultar part de deu articles sobre policies infiltrats. Des del Grup Barnils hem denunciat que aquesta actuació amenaça el periodisme d’investigació i pot tenir un greu efecte intimidatori sobre el conjunt dels mitjans. Exigim l’arxivament immediat de l’expedient: investigar els poders públics no pot …
🔥2
Bon dia, LLIBRES | Nois i noies que volen fer de pagès "Aquest llibre no parla només de camps, de vaques o de tractors. Parla d'una generació de joves amb idees clares i emprenedores per garantir el futur del camp." A Arrels rebels, la periodista Agnès Batlle dona veu a joves que han decidit quedar-se al món rural i demostrar que la pagesia també pot ser innovació, compromís i futur. ✍️ Ressenya d'Humbert Roma ht…
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
La veritat no és delicte Els drets humans fan nosa a qui voldria viure instal·lat en una societat feudal, diu Quico Ràfols, secretari general del Sindicat de Periodistes, en aquesta entrevista per a Mèdia.cat. També recorda que el dret a la informació és clau per protegir tota la resta de drets i que la censura no sempre consisteix a impedir que una notícia es publiqui. De vegades, adopta una forma més subtil: deman…
Bon dia, ENTREVISTA | Quico Ràfols: "Un SLAPP és una clatellada a la democràcia" "Els grans poders de sempre no volen que res qüestioni l’statu quo" Francesc 'Quico' Ràfols alerta que les creixents demandes abusives contra periodistes i activistes no busquen només guanyar als tribunals: pretenen intimidar, desgastar i fer que la pròxima vegada t’ho pensis dues vegades. ✍️ Anna Schnabel Font https://www.media.cat/…
Bon dia, OPINIÓ | I què fem amb l’autocensura? L’autocensura pot semblar un problema individual, però és, sobretot, un problema professional i col·lectiu. ✍️ Carme Porta https://www.media.cat/2026/07/21/i-que-fem-amb-lautocensura/
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MediacatCat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 996,537 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mèdia.cat” (@MediacatCat), 381 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MediacatCat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.