Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Враги сообщества уличные гонки

@Maxim_Shestakoff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

215subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004332481671
TypeChannel
Username@Maxim_Shestakoff
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Maxim_Shestakoff

Growth

1852152007 August 2026 — 185 subscribers8 August 2026 — 186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 186 subscribers14 August 2026 — 215 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:19215+29
8 Aug 2026, 12:16186no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:32186+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:47185first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
152.4%
avg views ÷ 215 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held11 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total3,605
Reactions total237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19080.2%
💘135.49%
🔥135.49%
🥰93.80%
👎41.69%
❤‍🔥31.27%
👍31.27%
🍓10.422%
🤡10.422%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC91 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В ближайшее время мы планируем активизировать нашу инициативу. Если разработчики игры не обратят внимания на обращения сообщества и не выйдут с игроками на конструктивный диалог, ситуация может получить более широкий резонанс. В связи с этим предлагаю всем игрокам объединиться и совместно обсудить дальнейшее развитие проекта: какие изменения вы хотели бы видеть в игре, какого нового контента вам не хватает, какие ме

11🔥4🥰2💘1

7 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC320 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ребята, оставляйте отзывы в магазине приложений, где размещена наша любимая игра. Ставьте одну звезду и пишите следущий отзыв: Уважаемое руководство! Обращаемся к вам с жалобой на действия администратора Максима Шестакова и просим провести внутреннюю проверку. У игроков накопилось множество серьёзных вопросов относительно объективности принимаемых администрацией решений, прозрачности системы наказаний и качества обр

26👎4🥰3🔥2💘1🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC334 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уважаемое руководство и владельцы игры Drag Racing! Обращаемся к вам с официальной жалобой относительно работы администратора Максима Шестакова и решений, которые принимаются им в отношении игроков и игрового сообщества. На протяжении определённого времени у игроков возникают серьёзные вопросы к принципам работы администрации, объективности принимаемых решений и информированности руководства игры о происходящих вну

14💘2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC348 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

9. В случае выявления нарушений со стороны представителей администрации принять соответствующие меры. Мы не ставим своей целью необоснованно обвинить кого-либо. Наша цель — добиться объективной проверки, прозрачности и справедливого отношения к игрокам. Просим руководство рассмотреть данную жалобу не только как отдельный конфликт между игроками и администрацией, а как сигнал о проблемах, которые могут негативно отр

21🥰4💘3

7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC378 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сокращенная версия Уважаемое руководство! Обращаемся с жалобой на действия администратора Максима Шестакова и просим провести внутреннюю проверку. У игроков накопились серьёзные вопросы к объективности решений администрации, прозрачности наказаний и качеству обратной связи с руководством проекта. 1. Блокировки без достаточных оснований По мнению сообщества, блокировки аккаунтов нередко применяются без убедительны

17💘2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC300 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Данный текст распростняйте по всем возможным ресурсам, официальным и нет, где есть возможность отправить комментарий. Google play, appGallery, app stor, официальное сообщество в ВК, на их сайте, в поддержку

13💘2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC351 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так Вам на заметку ещё пару скриншотов из переписки с этим гением. Вы оказывается не люди!

16👍3💘2

7 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC339 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В связи с подобными ответами я, как и многие другие игроки, хотел бы получить позицию и разъяснения от других представителей команды разработчиков и ответственных лиц, принимающих решения. Ответы текущего представителя администрации вызывают множество вопросов у игрового сообщества. Складывается впечатление, что его позицию поддерживает лишь ограниченный круг лиц, которые находятся в тесном взаимодействии между собой

17🍓1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC412 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Нам предоставили некий ответ от нашего администратора игры Максима. Если быть точнее, я увидел в одной из групп его личную переписку в Telegram с одним из игроков игры. В данных скриншотах мы видим, как Максим говорит, что мы мошенники и вымогатели, говорит про какие-то макросы и о том, что якобы на днях забанили каких-то макросников, которые предоставляли какие-то услуги. При этом он указывает на контакты игры, но

21❤‍🔥1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC398 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Максим согласился при одном условии — что людям будут сняты блокировки после того, как мы сольём софт. На это мы и пошли и слили софт, но людям, которые не были виноваты в этом, так и не вернули аккаунты. В связи с выше перечисленным я прошу вас не верить данному администратору игры и оказать нам содействие, а также добиться обратной связи от других разработчиков и людей, принимающих решения в игре.

23❤‍🔥1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC334 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11❤‍🔥1🔥1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Maxim_Shestakoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 56,685 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Враги сообщества уличные гонки” (@Maxim_Shestakoff), 215 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maxim_Shestakoff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.