Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Drag Racing to be continued...

@YGconfig

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,267subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905103763
TypeChannel
Username@YGconfig
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YGconfig

Growth

1,2671,2771,2727 August 2026 — 1,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,277 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,271 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,267 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,266–1,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:151,267-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:111,271-6
7 Aug 2026, 22:471,277no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:101,277first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 1,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (13 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,253
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
642.9%
🥰535.7%
👍214.3%
❤‍🔥17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребята, оставляйте отзывы в магазине приложений, где размещена наша любимая игра. Ставьте одну звезду и пишите следущий отзыв: Уважаемое руководство! Обращаемся к вам с жалобой на действия администратора Максима Шестакова и просим провести внутреннюю проверку. У игроков накопилось множество серьёзных вопросов относительно объективности принимаемых администрацией решений, прозрачности системы наказаний и качества обр

🥰2

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Maxim_Shestakoff

Обращение к сообществу Drag Racing Уличные гонки!!! Мы запускаем общественную инициативу и просим всех неравнодушных игроков максимально распространить эту информацию во всех сообществах, связанных с нашей любимой игрой «Drag Racing Уличные гонки», включая службу поддержки в социальной сети «ВКонтакте» и почту поддержки данного игрового проекта. Мы заявляем, что у нас существует программное обеспечение «Софт» для 2d

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC44 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Maxim_Shestakoff

Наша цель — не навредить проекту, а добиться конструктивных изменений. Мы хотим: 1. Пересмотра спорных блокировок аккаунтов, если они были вынесены без убедительной доказательной базы. Мы не говорим о своих аккаунтах, но и многие из наших аккаунтов были заблокированы без какой-либо доказательной базы. 2. Открытого диалога между разработчиками и игровым сообществом, а не того, что сейчас происходит с нашим «любимым

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Maxim_Shestakoff

Со своей стороны мы готовы к сотрудничеству. Если разработчики проявят готовность к открытому диалогу и начнут учитывать мнение игроков, мы прекратим текущую деятельность и передадим всю имеющуюся у нас информацию о программном обеспечении, макросах и других инструментах, предоставляющих преимущество в игре. Мы готовы помочь выявить существующие уязвимости и содействовать их устранению, чтобы сделать игру честнее и б

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Maxim_Shestakoff

Также, в свою очередь, мы понимаем, что Шестаков Максим может противодействовать нашему обращению и закрывать вам, игрокам, рот игровыми блокировками, но всё же надеемся, что вам действительно важна судьба данной игры и проекта в целом. Спасибо каждому, кто поддержит распространение этой информации. Если же разработчики и владельцы проекта проигнорируют данное обращение, то мы, в свою очередь, распространим бесплатно

🥰3

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

4 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC188 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТОПОРА ЗАБАНИЛИ, УРАААА (Жека, глава клана ульт)

4❤‍🔥1

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

28 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC373 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

легит, бля буду особенно К-свап, вообще беспалевно

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

17 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC457 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/vinilsWhiteSe/170 Выкладывай к себе

1

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

21 Jun 2026, 17:19 UTC667 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДОБРОГО ВРЕМЕНИ СУТОК КОМЬЮНИТИ DR УГ, КЛАН 🔥SF|STEP IN FUTURE 🔥 СНОВА ОТКРЫВАЕТ НАБОР В КЛАН И ИМЕННО У ВАС ЕСТЬ ШАНС СТАТЬ ЧАСТЬЮ НАШЕЙ СЕМЬИ. НИЖЕ БУДУТ ПРЕДОСТАВЛЕНЫ ТРЕБОВАНИЯ К УЧАСТНИКУ, НЕПОДХОДЯЩИХ ПО ТРЕБОВАНИЯМ ПРОСЬБА НЕ БЕСПОКОИТЬ. От вас: 1• 5 фулл сетов едущих в топ 2• Своевременный откат боссов 3• Еженедельный взнос в размере 650$ 4• Желание расти и развиваться 5• Возраст 15+ От нас вы получите: 1•

1

Signed 死から目覚めて生き返る

13 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC433 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wingerbekPhoto

Долго думал над этим постом, размышлял, думал нужно ли это в целом выводить на публику ибо толку не будет тк как у данных персонажей есть своя база подсосов но все же мне лично похуй, попробую открыть кому то глаза, может кто то прозреет. Речь пойдет о двух великих пиздаболах уг известные под никами Swarog и ANG. На первого есть видосик кншн что типы что то увидят на нем и сошлются на деф ибо я уже видел приколы с вм

👍1

13 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC455 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wingerbek

Ну и также наивным типам посвещается кто думает что эти две персоны легит))) Чел с 22 года сидит на макросе, интересно с появлением нейронки, чото придумали типы к 26 году

👍1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @YGconfig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,186,470 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Drag Racing to be continued...” (@YGconfig), 1,267 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YGconfig.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.