8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,756–56,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:14
55,901
-45
11 Aug 2026, 12:33
55,946
-62
10 Aug 2026, 14:28
56,008
+219
9 Aug 2026, 15:17
55,789
-47
8 Aug 2026, 11:57
55,836
-42
7 Aug 2026, 09:44
55,878
-8
6 Aug 2026, 23:45
55,886
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:35
55,886
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.08%
avg views ÷ 55,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
601
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
71 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
42,685
Reactions total
1,065
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,100
Videos
≈261
Links
≈715
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,065 reactions across 71 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
913
85.7%
⚡
52
4.88%
👏
43
4.04%
🤩
14
1.31%
❤🔥
13
1.22%
🎉
5
0.469%
😁
5
0.469%
🤣
5
0.469%
👀
4
0.376%
😢
4
0.376%
🙏
3
0.282%
💘
2
0.188%
🫡
2
0.188%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,065reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Disse a pura verdade! ✅
Iman Vellani sobre o sucesso de ‘Homem-Aranha: um novo dia'. 🕷️🎥
"As pessoas compareceram na primeira semana. [Isso significa que] ninguém realmente acreditava na fadiga de super-heróis, ninguém realmente acreditava que este filme ia fracassar.
Acho que estamos tão acostumados a sermos cínicos e a presumir que tudo novo que sai vai ser ruim e, sabe, 'É tudo propaganda' ou 'As atenções das p…
Os Talokanos retornarão em 'PANTERA NEGRA 3'!
Tenoch Huerta voltará como Namor, assim como Mabel Cadena como Namora e Alex Livinalli como Attuma.
🗞MCUFilmNews
↪@marvel_brasil rumo aos 60 mil inscritos 🚀✨
Destin Daniel Cretton relembra sua experiência trabalhando com Sadie Sink, de 14 anos, em 'O Castelo de Vidro'. 🎬
Perguntei a ela o que faria em seguida, e ela disse: 'Ah, vou participar de uma série chamada Stranger Things'. Eu respondi: 'Que legal! Boa sorte!'”
E agora eles se reencontraram, falta apenas Brie Larson, que foi muito rápido nos pós-créditos de Shang-Chi 🤔
🗞MCUFilmNews
↪@marvel_brasil
Angela Bassett está cogitada para retornar como a Rainha Ramonda em 'Pantera Negra 3' 🐾
Dizem que o Plano Ancestral terá um papel proeminente no filme.
Isso é fantástico! Depois de Valhalla em Thor: Amor e Trovão, podemos ter histórias incríveis ⚡
🗞Cosmic_marvel
↪@marvel_brasi
Esse gibi será incrível! 🤩
Uma série em quadrinhos de crossover entre Star Wars e Marvel está oficialmente acontecendo.
A série será escrita por Kevin Smith, com arte de David Marquez. ✍️
Duas franquias gigantescas dos quadrinhos e das telas.🎬
🗞️ McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos
Feliz 24º aniversário para Iman Vellan! 🎂
Tomara que tenha uma participação com muito tempo de tela em Vingadores: Doutor Destino! 🎬
Talentosíssima! ✨
🗞️ McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos!
Homem-Aranha: um novo dia ultrapassou US$ 1,7 bilhão na bilheteria mundial. 💰
O filme agora está no caminho para superar os US$ 1,9 bilhão de bilheteria mundial de ‘Homem-Aranha: sem volta para casa'. 🎬
O filme também está no caminho para se tornar o filme do Homem-Aranha de maior bilheteria. 🏆
Sucesso absoluto 🥳
🗞️ McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos
Lindo 🥳
Primeiro olhar para o console e o controle do PS5 em edição limitada com o ‘WOLVERINE’, da Insomniac. 🦾
O que achou compraria? 🤔
Neste momento que o PS6 em breve será lançado.
🗞 McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos
🚨 RUMOR:
O elenco dos X-Men no filme ‘X-MEN’ da Marvel Studios supostamente incluirá Jean Grey, Cyclops, Beast, Angel e Iceman 🦸♂️.
Rogue não é uma membro completa da equipe, mas ainda assim desempenha um papel importante na história 📖.
Outros mutantes também aparecerão na Escola Xavier 🏫.
Quem você quer ver no filme? 🤔
🗞️ McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil
Kevin Feige sobre escalar Tom Holland como Homem-Aranha em ‘CAPITÃO AMÉRICA: GUERRA CIVIL’. 🕷️
“Havia muitos concorrentes. Mas à medida que as escolhas foram sendo reduzidas, ficou muito, mas muito claro que era Tom [Holland]. 🎬
🗞️ McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos
Kevin Feige confirma que 'Vingadores: Doutor Destino' manterá sua data de lançamento! 🎬
Nos cinemas em 18 de dezembro.
🗞 McuFilmNews
↪️ @marvel_brasil, rumo aos 60 mil inscritos
❤14
Signed Denis
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @Marvel_Brasil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Você já assistiu Homem-Aranha: um novo dia. O motivo para liberarmos os Spoilers.
Sim75%
Não26%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 704,039 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Marvel_Brasil named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@marvel_brasi named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“X-MEN'97 💪🏾😎 | MARVEL BRASIL” (@Marvel_Brasil), 55,901 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marvel_Brasil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.