Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Taylor Swift Updates ❤️‍🔥

Channel

Taylor Swift Updates ❤️‍🔥

@TaylorSwiftBr

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,960subscribers

-363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001075952421
TypeChannel
Username@TaylorSwiftBr
DescriptionHá mais de 6 anos sendo a maior fonte de informações, fotografias e conteúdo multimídia de Taylor Swift no Telegram. Confira também: • Canal da turnê: @theerastour
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TaylorSwiftBr

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Taylor Swift Updates 💘” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

7,9608,3238,141.56 August 2026 — 8,323 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,323 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,316 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,310 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,299 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,289 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,279 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,267 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,266 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,265 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,254 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,239 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,206 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,187 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,157 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,130 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,109 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,102 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,087 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,078 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,065 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,042 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,019 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,004 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,979 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,960 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -363. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,906–8,377 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 01:497,960-19
5 Nov 2026, 14:087,979-25
2 Nov 2026, 07:098,004-15
30 Oct 2026, 13:468,019-23
27 Oct 2026, 06:108,042-23
24 Oct 2026, 16:168,065-13
21 Oct 2026, 15:398,078-9
18 Oct 2026, 08:508,087-15
15 Oct 2026, 09:298,102-7
12 Oct 2026, 18:508,109-21
6 Oct 2026, 02:568,130-27
28 Sept 2026, 22:018,157-30
15 Sept 2026, 13:148,187-19
11 Sept 2026, 12:568,206-33
7 Sept 2026, 02:198,239-15
2 Sept 2026, 12:058,254-11
30 Aug 2026, 22:488,265-1
28 Aug 2026, 07:058,266-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:088,267-12
23 Aug 2026, 00:438,279first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 7,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held41 (3 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total7,933
Reactions total442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈19,200
Videos
≈2,590
Links
≈2,360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,178 reactions across 38 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,58772.9%
😁28513.1%
😭1205.51%
🥰592.71%
🤬572.62%
🔥261.19%
😍100.459%
🤨80.367%
🗿50.23%
🤔50.23%
🤩50.23%
😘30.138%
😨20.092%
🤡20.092%
🌚10.046%
🎉10.046%
😈10.046%
😱10.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

24 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC≈1,190 views102 reactionsread 11 November 2026

20 ANOS DE TAYLOR SWIFT HOJE OU SEJA AMANHÃ É 13! 🌟

❤97🤨5

18 Oct 2026, 02:05 UTC≈1,950 views104 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#FOTO: GENTE! Taylor Swift no Academy Museum Gala.

❤99😁3🔥2

14 Oct 2026, 01:49 UTC≈2,120 views93 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤71😁13🤩5🤬3😈1

12 Oct 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,760 views65 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#GRAMMYs: Confira as submissões de Taylor Swift ao GRAMMYs 2027. The Life of a Showgirl • Album of the Year • Best Pop Vocal Album • Best Album Cover • Best Engineered Album The Fate of Ophelia • Record of the Year • Best Pop Solo Performance • Best Music Video The Life of a Showgirl (feat. Sabrina Carpenter) • Best Pop Duo/Group Performance I Knew It, I Knew You • Song of the Year • Best Song Written for Visual …

❤62🔥3

27 Sept 2026, 23:29 UTC≈2,290 views89 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#FOTO: Taylor Swift. #VMAs

❤80🥰7😘2

27 Sept 2026, 23:26 UTC≈2,010 views119 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#FOTO: Taylor Swift debuta no tapete do Video Music Awards 2026. #VMAs

❤101😍10🥰4🤡2😁1😘1

25 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,030 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😭29🤨3🎉1

25 Sept 2026, 04:14 UTC≈1,910 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Patient Zero > Babylon > Pink Clouding > Cleveland

😁34❤16

25 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC≈1,860 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#SHOOT: Taylor Swift para ‘The Life Of A Showgirl: The Encore’. 0️⃣

❤57🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @TaylorSwiftBr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VISION QUEST 💪🏾😎 | MARVEL BRASIL
@Marvel_Brasil · 57,336
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
B.Sc. NURSING 💊💉
@Bscnursing · 44,052
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Taylor Swift Updates ❤️‍🔥” (@TaylorSwiftBr), 7,960 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TaylorSwiftBr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.