Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
19 measurements spanning 22 days, net -729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,131–33,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 09:18
32,240
-71
4 Sept 2026, 15:14
32,311
-42
3 Sept 2026, 01:53
32,353
-34
1 Sept 2026, 21:04
32,387
-65
31 Aug 2026, 19:25
32,452
-43
30 Aug 2026, 15:47
32,495
-37
29 Aug 2026, 13:17
32,532
-30
28 Aug 2026, 13:44
32,562
-24
27 Aug 2026, 14:19
32,586
-34
26 Aug 2026, 13:34
32,620
-31
25 Aug 2026, 14:58
32,651
-30
24 Aug 2026, 15:47
32,681
-71
23 Aug 2026, 00:56
32,752
-56
21 Aug 2026, 13:07
32,808
-28
20 Aug 2026, 12:28
32,836
-42
19 Aug 2026, 10:07
32,878
-23
18 Aug 2026, 12:55
32,901
-41
17 Aug 2026, 10:34
32,942
-27
16 Aug 2026, 15:30
32,969
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
147
Links
138
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
950 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
649
68.3%
👍
73
7.68%
👏
55
5.79%
🙏
45
4.74%
💩
34
3.58%
🤣
31
3.26%
🔥
19
2.00%
😁
18
1.89%
🫡
7
0.737%
🥴
6
0.632%
🥰
4
0.421%
🥱
3
0.316%
🤔
2
0.211%
🤡
2
0.211%
🌚
1
0.105%
😱
1
0.105%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 950 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 11 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
11 verdades duras sobre as pessoas
1. O mais inseguro → ataca
2. O mais superficial → fala mais
3. O mais insatisfeito → inveja
4. O mais perdido → usa máscaras
5. O mais forte → mostra bondade
6. O mais inteligente → ouve mais
7. O mais rico → é simples
8. O mais feliz → precisa de pouco
9. O mais sábio → permanece calmo
10. O maior → parece discreto
11. O mais leal → tem paciência♟️
90% dos seus problemas na vida adulta serão eliminados se você apenas:
1. Se exercitar regularmente.
2. Comer comida de verdade (feita em casa).
3. Encontrar 1-2 amigos verdadeiros.
4. Viver abaixo das suas possibilidades financeiras.
5. Fazer o que você ama como trabalho.
6. Corrigir seu ciclo de sono.
7. Priorizar disciplina ao invés de motivação.♟️
Dois anos atrás, você teve problemas dos quais nem se lembra. Mas, na época, eles pareciam um grande problema, certo? E, no entanto... aqui está você.
Isso também vai passar. Continue. Você é mais forte do que pensa.
Levante-se de novo.
E de novo.
E de novo.
Cada vez que você se levanta, você se aproxima um passo da linha de chegada.
Continue lutando, mano. A vitória se constrói com persistência.
Assim que acordar, hidrate-se
Assim que se sentir estressado, corra
Assim que se sentir triste, tome sol
Assim que se sentir cansado, caminhe
Assim que duvidar de si mesmo, medite
Assim que você se sentir com raiva, levante pesos
💡 Indicações do dia:
📘 O Poder do Agora — Eckhart Tolle
Um dos livros mais transformadores sobre foco, presença e clareza mental.
🎬 À Procura da Felicidade — com Will Smith
Um lembrete de que disciplina, fé e resiliência abrem qualquer porta.
#ClubeDaMente #Motivação #Negócios #Sucesso #Empreendedorismo #Mentalidade #Foco #Disciplina #LeituraDoDia #FilmeDoDia #BancoDeMentes
❤5👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @clubedamente. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 11 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AMALDIÇOADA CASEI COM O DON NO LUGAR @dramasperfeito · 69,840 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 20 August 2026
TrailersBR ✨| Filmes e Séries @TrailersBR · 113,140 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Clube da Mente” (@clubedamente), 32,240 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clubedamente.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.