Channel
@MarkInsidooor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
351subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093678913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MarkInsidooor |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MarkInsidooor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 351 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 352 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 352 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 14.3% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.40% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 3.30% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2024 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The biggest scalp opportunities come after capitulation dumps. $XAG just flushed 26.8%. Entry on the rebound: $84.50-86 Target: $92 (Fib 61.8% resistance) Risk: 1.5% max Time: 50 minutes Confluences stacking: ✓ RSI oversold recovery ✓ Institutional repositioning ✓ Volume exhaustion pattern ✓ Fib layers aligned This is textbook. Who's taking it? https://x.com/cryptomark/status/2017600661941326258?s=46
❤5❤🔥1
MARK SIGNALs pinned «Retweet and comments - MUST Why Mark Is highly paid KOL in crypto on Twitter ? @x @elonmusk Am I or it’s someone else ? Subscribe to know - From Sniper entry like a market maker on $ETH and $BTC King of MEMES- you get info and things before anyone…»
Retweet and comments - MUST Why Mark Is highly paid KOL in crypto on Twitter ? @x @elonmusk Am I or it’s someone else ? Subscribe to know - From Sniper entry like a market maker on $ETH and $BTC King of MEMES- you get info and things before anyone https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/1886848257113935947?s=46
🔥6❤🔥2
MARK SIGNALs pinned «https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/1817108942146695256?s=46»
https://x.com/cryptomarketh/status/1817108942146695256?s=46
🔥2
MARK SIGNALs pinned «https://t.me/+YVIB-9PGeu1kZjRl Only Adding with people above 30k USDT worth Dex wallet Everyone who Will inactive will be kicked - no rejoin»
https://t.me/+YVIB-9PGeu1kZjRl Only Adding with people above 30k USDT worth Dex wallet Everyone who Will inactive will be kicked - no rejoin
❤4
MARK SIGNALs pinned «BTC update:- Last BTC update perfectly played well now BTC close 60.2 is good sign we expect some short sequeez soon, and no need to loss 60k again if it's happen we will see 54k next zone.»
BTC update:- Last BTC update perfectly played well now BTC close 60.2 is good sign we expect some short sequeez soon, and no need to loss 60k again if it's happen we will see 54k next zone.
❤12🥰3🔥1😢1
Close at BE and wait for 59k zone
❤6👍2🤔1
BTC now at above the entry after the DCA
BTC follow my plan exactly now time to bounce here important zone
🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MarkInsidooor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARK SIGNALs” (@MarkInsidooor), 351 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MarkInsidooor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.