Channel
@Marina_media
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,108subscribers
-982 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001613466510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Marina_media |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Marina_media |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,108 | -1,011 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 2,119 | +22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 2,097 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 2,092 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,090 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 2,090 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (21 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,320 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 76.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 23.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжая разговор о важности достоверной информации, расскажу про ESG Медиа — экспертное деловое СМИ об устойчивом развитии. ESG Медиа - независимая медиаплатформа, которая переводит повестку устойчивого развития с языка сухих отчетов на язык живых смыслов, решений и человеческих ценностей. Мы показываем, что за каждым системным изменением всегда стоят люди и их выбор. Тематические рубрики платформы: ⦁ Новости — к…
❤2
Информация сегодня не просто ценный ресурс, это необходимость, особенно в условиях шума, дипфейков и поверхности мышления. Когда мы говорим об устойчивом развитии, погружение в тему необходимо не только экспертам, но и всем участникам повестки - от государства и крупных корпораций, до социальных предпринимателей и представителей некоммерческого сектора. Наша Премия "Хедлайнеры устойчивого развития" из года в год по…
Поговорили о предпринимательстве, социальной ответственности бизнеса и политике с Ильёй Лещевым, автором ИД Питер. Кстати, бизнес-роман "Шведский стол" можно приобрести на сайте издательства
В 2026 году искренность перестала быть абстрактным понятием — она стала измеримым коммерческим активом. Попытка сэкономить на ответственности и подменить реальные дела громкими рекламными лозунгами неизбежно приводит к репутационным потерям. Корпоративное волонтёрство, совмещённое с профессиональными знаниями команды и организационной поддержкой компании, остаётся самым надёжным фильтром, который отделяет громкую ими…
❤2
Часто за бесконечными спорами о том, «правильная» ли аббревиатура написана на вывеске, скрывается обычная управленческая лень. Когда топ-менеджер или представитель структуры тратит энергию на то, чтобы раскритиковать стандарт ESG, но при этом не может ответить, как его предприятие снижает выбросы или удерживает молодежь в моногороде — это не патриотизм. Это жонглирование терминологией с единственной целью: отложить …
❤3🔥3
В условиях стремительного роста мегаполисов осознанные интерьерные дизайнеры всё чаще выбирают рациональное потребление ресурсов. Это выражается в заботе об историческом архитектурном наследии и бережном переосмыслении ценных городских пространств. Подробнее в нашем материале "Второе дыхание наследия: как русский дизайн возвращает к жизни исторические усадьбы", написанном Татьяной Шахнес. Культура и устойчивое разви…
❤3
Ответственный бизнес не ставят на паузу: почему за любой ESG-стратегией всегда стоит человек Вчера были в гостях у наших друзей и партнеров из LG. Каждый раз, общаясь с людьми, которые разделяют ценности устойчивого развития, я ловлю себя на одной простой, но очень глубокой мысли: устойчивое развитие — это не про отчеты в графических редакторах и не про строчки в бюджетах. За каждым социальным или экологическим про…
❤3
☘️Огромное спасибо "ESG Медиа" за очень интересный круглый стол «Перекрёсток перемен: точка зрелости бизнеса и устойчивого развития». Отличные спикеры: как и на донорских мероприятиях люди говорят от души, причем на совещании были собраны совершенно разные сообщества: производство строительных материалов, мы, как электроника, дружественные СМИ, повествующие об устройчивой повестке, инновационные компании, предлагающи…
🔥2
Национальные стандарты – одна из самых популярных дискуссионных тем для современного бизнеса. Рекомендуем посетить мероприятие, чтобы лучше познакомиться с повесткой! Приглашаем на бесплатную образовательную конференцию в рамках Премии «Зелёные стандарты - пространства будущего» (Green Standard Awards 2026) 📆Когда? 21 августа 2026 года. ⭐Где? Москва, площадка «Умный город» ДИТ Москвы. ✔️Формат: очное участие + онла…
Даже, если нет возможности взять полноценный отпуск, вырваться на несколько дней всегда можно. Короткие московские каникулы начинаются 😉
❤3
Продвигая повестку устойчивого развития, команда ESG Медиа всегда поддерживает проекты, которые меняют мир к лучшему. Рады сообщить, что мы стали информационным партнёром Фестиваля созидательного искусства в Санкт-Петербурге (27–31 августа). Мы проведём круглый стол в рамках Фестиваля и обсудим с экспертами, что сделать нам - создателям контента, чтобы он влиял на общество исключительно позитивно. Накануне события м…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Marina_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 118,777 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ESG Медиа l Марина Богомягкова|Канал главреда” (@Marina_media), 1,108 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marina_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.