Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Machine learning & AI news

@Machine_learning_AInews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

568subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002797495413
TypeChannel
Username@Machine_learning_AInews
DescriptionThe latest AI news, from machine learning to computer vision and more.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Machine_learning_AInews

Growth

5687 Aug 2026, 16:30 — 568 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 568 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:308 Aug 2026, 03:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 567–569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:32568no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:30568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,400
Videos
21
Links
1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
266.7%
🥰133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 08:24 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Amazing_LearnPhoto

Parts of an earpod 💯 Learn something new every day

2

23 Jun 2026, 04:59 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mechanic_videoVideo

There's something incredibly satisfying in observing precision in action. Every smooth cut, every perfect chisel mark, and every measured movement is a reminder that excellent results are achieved through skill, patience, and attention to detail. Techno videos 🙂 @mechanic_video

13 Jun 2026, 10:43 UTC200 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic says it has taken its latest AI models offline to comply with new export controls AI giant Anthropic said Friday it has taken its latest artificial intelligence models, known as Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline to comply with a directive from the Trump administration to prevent their ...

🥰1

13 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC163 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A German Court Has Ruled That Google Is Liable for False Statements Generated by AI Overviews The ruling holds that a company that designs, trains, operates, and manages an AI system must assume legal liability for any damages caused by the responses it generates.

13 Jun 2026, 00:37 UTC141 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Meta Employees Absolutely Hate Zuckerberg’s Plan for a Companywide AI Hackathon “I’m not sure that this company supports a hackathon culture anymore,” one employee posted in a forum open to the entire staff.

12 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‘Tell Him He’s a Piece of Shit’: Meta’s New AI Unit Is a Total Mess Executives and employees alike are struggling with Meta's chaotic AI strategy, according to sources and internal discussions reviewed by WIRED.

12 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI’s hot IPO summer Watch as Equity breaks down the hot IPO summer, what Google's $920M compute deal with SpaceX says about the AI infrastructure race, and more of the week's headlines.

12 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Q&A: Can we trust AI models? Researchers explore the roots of chatbot errors The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has inserted a new character into people's lives: the chatbot.

12 Jun 2026, 16:33 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Human understanding of AI can't keep up with its advancement, researchers say In a recent editorial published in Science, Microsoft's chief scientific officer, Eric Horvitz, and researcher Robert West from the School of Computer and Communication Sciences at EPFL in Switzerland ...

12 Jun 2026, 15:32 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Despite the AI hype, some experts warn of a bubble—what happens if it pops? In the last few years, the hype around artificial intelligence has become stratospheric. Riding a wave of venture capital, tech leaders promised us AI would revolutionize work, boost productivity and ...

12 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Buying a laptop may soon come with instant carbon data, thanks to new AI agents If you shop on Google Flights, you get a quick comparison of different itineraries: One flight's carbon emissions may be average, while another's are 14% higher. But if you go shopping for a new laptop, ...

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Machine_learning_AInews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Machine learning & AI news” (@Machine_learning_AInews), 568 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Machine_learning_AInews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.