Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Directgram

@directgram

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,943subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002994796867
TypeChannel
Usernames@directgram @directory_tlgrm
Created27 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/directgram

Growth

11,94312,00211,972.57 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,985 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,985 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,968 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,968 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,960 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,960 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,949 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,949 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,943 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,943 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 5 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,934–12,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:3811,943no change
12 Aug 2026, 11:1411,943-6
11 Aug 2026, 17:0211,949no change
11 Aug 2026, 14:4211,949-11
10 Aug 2026, 15:0611,960no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:5311,960-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:0111,968no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:1711,968-17
8 Aug 2026, 18:1511,985no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:1611,985-11
7 Aug 2026, 21:1611,996no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4711,996-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:4812,002no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3012,002first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 27 August 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

989 reactions across 5 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75576.3%
🔥444.45%
👍373.74%
323.24%
👾262.63%
🥰262.63%
👏191.92%
🤯171.72%
🎃60.607%
👀50.506%
👎50.506%
🏆40.404%
💯40.404%
😁40.404%
🤩40.404%
🍌10.101%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 989reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2025, 15:40 UTC≈359,000 views484 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖 List bots & applications Tools: ChatGPT & Mj - combines Chatgpt👐, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, Dalle, and Suno to solve all your daily and work-related tasks. SozdavAI - multi-tool that includes TOP AI 🟡models: DeepSeek, Google Veo 3, Nano Banana, Grok and more. AVA Dream - creating 🧍‍♀️ai avatars from photos. Restyle photo - converts photos into different styles🔄 using neural networks. Literally M

360🔥2823🥰22👾20👏14👍7🎃6

6 Oct 2025, 10:55 UTC≈346,000 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚀 Neuralfan - creative video generations. The channel features modern AI art. Exciting, epic, and entertaining videos generated by a neural network. The channel is for those who are looking for inspiration, prompts for generation, or simply entertaining content. More about the channel... Format: short media. lang: english. 1-3 posts daily. ⭐ link: @neuralfan similar channels: AIvideos, Epic SH#T full list: @directg

82👾6🔥6👏5🤩4

6 Oct 2025, 10:55 UTC≈331,000 views154 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✉️ List of Channels AI: 🚀 Neural'fan - creative video generations. ▶️ AI Videos Hub - epic and funny videos. 😎 Epic SH#T - exciting neuro arts & videos. 🖥 AI Global News - aggregator of top news sources. ✈️ News and Trends AI - top news, trends and tutorials in video format. ⌨️ Machine learning & AI news - the latest AI news, from machine learning to computer vision and more. ROBOTS:

125🤯7👀5👎5🏆4💯4👍2🥰2

6 Oct 2025, 10:43 UTC≈296,000 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Directory Telegram channel and bot, as well as lists of the best mini-apps. Getting to know projects, tools, and services in Telegram. ✉️ List of channels Explore channels on popular topics. Stay up-to-date with the latest global news, current cryptocurrency prices, advances in artificial intelligence, new discoveries in science or technology and much more. 🤖 List bots & applications Catalog of the best mini apps

150👍14🔥10🤯109🍌1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @directgram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 24,506 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Directgram” (@directgram), 11,943 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directgram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.