Join us @MPSCGeography

Channel
MPSC Geography
@MPSCGeography
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
120,007subscribers
-258 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001061419223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MPSCGeography |
| Description | Here u can get all useful info about Geography & Agri for competitive exams. @eMPSCkatta @ChaluGhadamodi @Jobkatta @Marathi @MPSCEnglish @MPSCPolity @MPSCEconomics @MPSCHistory @MPSCScience @SpardhaGram @MPSCMaterialKatta |
| Created | 14 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MPSCGeography |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 120,007 | -47 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 120,054 | -46 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 120,100 | -58 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 120,158 | -46 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 120,204 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 120,221 | -44 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 120,265 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 120,265 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.75%
- avg views ÷ 120,007 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,900
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 82,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,850
- Videos
- ≈82
- Links
- ≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Join us @MPSCGeography
Join us @MPSCGeography
🔹कसे चालतात ‘राधानगरी’चे स्वयंचलित दरवाजे? देशातील एकमेव स्वयंचलित दरवाजे राधानगरी धरणाला आहेत. स्थापत्य शास्त्राचा अद्भूत नमुना म्हणून ओळखले जाणारे सात स्वयंचलित दरवाजे तब्बल चौसष्ट वर्षांनंतरही धरणातील पाण्याचा सुरक्षितपणे विसर्ग करत आहेत. कोणत्याही यांत्रिक ऊर्जेशिवाय हे दरवाजे चालतात कसे? याबाबत उत्सुकता ताणली असून या दरवाजांमुळे जुनं ते सोनं ही म्हण खरी ठरली आहे. जल विसर्गाबरोबर कमालीचे सौंदर्यही या दरवाजांमुळ…
इतिहास Live Batch Date: 1 ऑगस्ट पासून Time: दररोज सकाळी 9वा. App Link 👇👇👇 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.history.sachin.gulig संपर्क: 9545600535
जॉईन करा @MPSCGeography
🌋🔥🔥☄🔥🔥💥 ▪️तलाठी गट - क मध्ये तलाठी भरती गट क मध्ये ... ● 1539 तलाठी ● एकूण जागा 3088 ▪️2619 + 3088 = 5707 =========== https://t.me/eMPSCkatta
महाराष्ट्रातील प्रमुख ऊर्जा प्रकल्प जॉइन करा @MPSCGeography
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MPSCGeography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,214 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@mpsctelegram · 32116 postsMPSCmaths
@MPSCmaths · 33,3088 postsMPSC Maharashtra
@eMahaMPSC · 7,6517 postsMajhiTest.com
@MajhiTest · 6,8475 posts🎯 eMPSCKatta 🎯
@eMPSCkatta · 98,4294 postseMegaBharti
@eMegaBharti · 4,6632 postsUPSC In Marathi
@UPSCinMarathi · 4,8192 postsपोलीस भरती By eMPSCKatta
@ePoliceBharati · 761 postसरळसेवा तयारी By eMPSCkatta
@eSaralseva · 211 postतलाठी भरती By eMPSCkatta
@eTalathiBharati · 91 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@marathi · 207,983
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MPSC Geography” (@MPSCGeography), 120,007 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MPSCGeography.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.