Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

History By Sachin Gulig

@History4all

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

45,143subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301221084
TypeChannel
Username@History4all
DescriptionMPSC /UPSC/ PSI /STI/ASO साठी उपयुक्त 🎯इतिहास विषयाची परिक्षाभिमुख माहीती 🎯दररोज प्रश्नांचा सराव 🎯शॉर्ट नोट्स/Pdf Material 🎯वरिल सर्व घटकांची अचूक माहिती मिळवा मार्गदर्शक:- सचिन गुळीग, पुणे 9545600535 /@india123
Created22 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/History4all

Growth

45,14345,24745,1956 August 2026 — 45,247 subscribers6 August 2026 — 45,233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,230 subscribers8 August 2026 — 45,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45,176 subscribers11 August 2026 — 45,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,143 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,127–45,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:1845,143-23
11 Aug 2026, 15:5845,166-10
10 Aug 2026, 15:0145,176-15
9 Aug 2026, 15:1445,191-21
8 Aug 2026, 13:5145,212-18
7 Aug 2026, 15:2645,230-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:2645,233-14
6 Aug 2026, 11:0445,247first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.98%
avg views ÷ 45,143 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.418%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held55 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total148,439
Reactions total488
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,320
Videos
193
Links
3,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

488 reactions across 39 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29961.3%
🫡5711.7%
🙏469.43%
👍438.81%
🔥173.48%
😍153.07%
👏61.23%
👌20.41%
🥰20.41%
🤝10.205%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 488reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC383 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @perainstitutepolitybynshyamPhoto

15 ऑगस्ट निमित्ताने सर्व कोर्सेस 50 % ऑफर वर फक्त 2 दिवस https://qtref.on-app.in/app/home?orgCode=qtref&referrer=utm_source=copy-link&utm

12 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,880 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmolPatilMarathiVideo

🟣 गट ब व गट क मुख्य परीक्षेकरिता 🟣 मराठी विषयाची विशेष बॅच 🟣 वेळ : रात्री 8 : 30 ते 10 : 30 🟣 बॅच कालावधी : फक्त 45 दिवस 🟣 सुरुवात : सोमवार, 10 ऑगस्ट 2026 🟣 मार्गदर्शक : अमोल पाटील 🟣 बॅच ऑफलाईन व ऑनलाईन स्वरूपात 🟣 ऑफलाईन फी : 3000 /- 🟣 ऑनलाईन फी : 2000 /- 🟣 संपर्क : 7517345810 / 8180029385 🟣 टेलिग्राम चॅनेल link : https://t.me/AmolPatilMarathi 🟣 app link : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com

5

12 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,240 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Noted ✍️ अचूक घटनाक्रम

9😍3👍1

12 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈2,400 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

गेलेला काळ कधीच बदलता येणार नाही, पण येणारा काळ आपल्याच हातात आहे. ⌛⏰🚨

20🔥2🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Lecture नियोजन Topic:: ब्रिटिशकालीन युद्ध 📌 History Live Lecture ⏰ सकाळी 9वा. App Link 👇👇👇 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.history.sachin.gulig 📌 History Offline Lecture ⏰ दुपारी 4.30वा. ⌛️ Topic:: युद्ध पत्ता: पेरा इन्स्टिटयूट, SP कॉलेज समोर. सचिन गुळीग :- 9545600535

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,150 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚कामगारांना शिक्षण देण्यासाठी आणि त्यांच्या तक्रारींचे निवारण करण्यासाठी "बॉम्बे मिल हॅन्ड्स डिफेन्स असोसिएशन" ची स्थापना कोणी केली?

  1. नारायण मेघाजी लोखंडे54%
  2. नारायण मल्हार जोशी33%
  3. लाला लजपतराय8%
  4. लोकमान्य टिळक5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5🤝1🫡1🙏1

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,090 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚"आम्हाला संसद नको होती, फक्त कायदेमंडळ हवे होते. ही कायदेमंडळेही संसदीय तत्वावर निवडलेली नको होती." अशी प्रतिक्रिया 1909 च्या कायद्यावर कोणी केली?

  1. महात्मा गांधी13%
  2. सच्चिदानंद सिन्हा59%
  3. लॉर्ड मिंटो25%
  4. वरीलपैकी नाही4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,960 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚खालीलपैकी कोणत्या प्रणालीत शासकीय अधिकारी सरळ शेतकऱ्यांकडून जमीन महसूल वसूल करीत असे?

  1. कायमधारा15%
  2. रयतवारी66%
  3. महालवारी17%
  4. वायदा2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,980 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚"द्विदल शासनपद्धती ही संक्रमणातील यंत्रणा म्हणून चांगली आहे" अशी टिका 1919 च्या मॉटेग्यू चेम्सफोर्ड सुधारणा कायद्यावर कोणी केली?

  1. लाला लजपतराय12%
  2. पंडित नेहरु25%
  3. लोकमान्य टिळक45%
  4. रॉबर्टसन18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5

11 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈2,380 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Noted कायमधारा प्रणाली (1793)

19🫡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @History4all. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz802 voters

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚कामगारांना शिक्षण देण्यासाठी आणि त्यांच्या तक्रारींचे निवारण करण्यासाठी "बॉम्बे मिल हॅन्ड्स डिफेन्स असोसिएशन" ची स्थापना कोणी केली?

  1. नारायण मेघाजी लोखंडे54%
  2. नारायण मल्हार जोशी33%
  3. लाला लजपतराय8%
  4. लोकमान्य टिळक5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz771 voters

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚"आम्हाला संसद नको होती, फक्त कायदेमंडळ हवे होते. ही कायदेमंडळेही संसदीय तत्वावर निवडलेली नको होती." अशी प्रतिक्रिया 1909 च्या कायद्यावर कोणी केली?

  1. महात्मा गांधी13%
  2. सच्चिदानंद सिन्हा59%
  3. लॉर्ड मिंटो25%
  4. वरीलपैकी नाही4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz755 voters

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚खालीलपैकी कोणत्या प्रणालीत शासकीय अधिकारी सरळ शेतकऱ्यांकडून जमीन महसूल वसूल करीत असे?

  1. कायमधारा15%
  2. रयतवारी66%
  3. महालवारी17%
  4. वायदा2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz757 voters

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚"द्विदल शासनपद्धती ही संक्रमणातील यंत्रणा म्हणून चांगली आहे" अशी टिका 1919 च्या मॉटेग्यू चेम्सफोर्ड सुधारणा कायद्यावर कोणी केली?

  1. लाला लजपतराय12%
  2. पंडित नेहरु25%
  3. लोकमान्य टिळक45%
  4. रॉबर्टसन18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,010 voters approx.

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚21 मार्च 1920 रोजी कागल जहागिरीतल्या माणगाव येथे भरलेल्या परिषदेत खालीलपैकी कोणाचा समावेश नव्हता?

  1. आप्पासाहेब दादगोंडा पाटील22%
  2. दादासाहेब गायकवाड32%
  3. तुकाराम गणेशाचार्य33%
  4. गंगाराम कांबळे13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTCAnonymous Quiz946 voters

✍️𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘 𝐁𝐘 𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐈𝐑 📚1918 फेब्रुवारीत पंडित मदन मोहन मालवीय यांच्या निमंत्रणावरून अखिल भारतीय हिंदू परिषदेस हजर राहण्यासाठी अलाहाबाद येथे खालीलपैकी कोण गेले?

  1. लोकमान्य टिळक10%
  2. स्वातंत्र्यवीर सावरकर44%
  3. डॉ. कुर्तकोटी42%
  4. न्यायमूर्ती रानडे5%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,376 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐒𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍 𝐃𝐇𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐄'𝐒 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐒 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘
@csatsachin · 294,674
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
चालू घडामोडी 2026
@ChaluGhadamodi2023 · 343,091
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
🚨𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗘𝗥'𝗦 𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗕🚨
@officer_club · 358,964
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
𝐕𝐈𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐏𝐒𝐂
@mpsc_vision · 179,820
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
MPSC
@official_mpsc · 384,162
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
महाराष्ट्र व भारताचा भूगोल
@Bhugolmpsc · 146,559
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
चालू घडामोडी + GK (Official)
@ChaluGhadamodiMPSC · 150,699
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Railway News Room🚀
@rrnewsroom · 177,235
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
🚨 सरळसेवा ऑफिसर्स क्लब🚨
@saralsewa_exam · 266,749
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Mission Police bharti ™
@missionpolice2021 · 274,832
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“History By Sachin Gulig” (@History4all), 45,143 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/History4all.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.