Channel
@MKQAQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
532subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001794447765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MKQAQ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 25 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MKQAQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 532 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 534 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (25 January 2023 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2023 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
全网最真实低价的卡网 里面有低价飞机号和国外微信 支付宝 https://gganh.226618.xyz https://gganh.226618.xyz https://gganh.226618.xyz https://gganh.226618.xyz https://gganh.226618.xyz https://gganh.226618.xyz 真实可靠频道有1.5k 售后8小时在线 售后 @NFNB66667 频道 https://t.me/NFNBYYD66
Signed 南风 （收广告位）
南风全网互推 点击一键加入全网最强挂圈封号圈 点击一键加入全网最强挂圈封号圈 点击一键加入全网最强挂圈封号圈 点击一键加入全网最强挂圈封号圈 点击一键加入全网最强挂圈封号圈 广告位 全网最真实低价的卡网 里面有低价飞机号和国外微信 支付宝 https://gganh.226618.xyz 互推联系 @NFNB66667 频道 https://t.me/NFNBYYD66
Signed 南风 （收广告位）
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
🎯 国际服 64位 ⚔️ 查看 UI ⚠️ 安装不了就是手机不适配 🎯 自瞄/子弹追踪/内存一套/ 🤣 无卡密 🔰 发送反馈 @afraabb 👉 查看 @msypl
👍3
Signed 晨风原作者🇨🇳
Channel name was changed to «kit程序❤️MK工作室❤️»
独家Hero MOD32位老外直装实力项目✅✅✅✅ 🟢绘制子弹追踪（完全安全） 🌍GL全球版／KR日韩版 没有任何的问题（完全安全）✅✅✅ 电报群：https://t.me/ustsyd 提卡链接：👏👏✅✅✅✅ https://themex.916.vin//links/9F45BF84 下载链接：👏👏✅✅✅✅ https://cloud.189.cn/t/qIbmA3jyyuAn 访问码：3cpg 支持任何问题询问↓↓✅ 独家HeroMOD联系：@GSyyds12 玩之前查看网盘里面所有的内容 在使用独家英雄MOD重置手机或改签名针对以前禁令多的用户✅✅✅✅ 独家Hero MOD内部：✅🔥 内部一赛季40人民币✅ 永久卡／内部一赛季卡√🔥✅✅✅ 联系我↓ @GSyyds12 官方频道：@HeroMod✅
👍1
Signed 𝔾𝕊
🎯 国际服 64位 ⚔️ 查看 UI ⚠️ 安装不了就是手机不适配 🎯 自瞄/子弹追踪/内存一套/ 🤣 无卡密 🔰 发送反馈 @afraabb 👉 查看 @msypl
Signed 晨风原作者🇨🇳
🇨🇳白屿 内部🇨🇳 ------------------------------------------- ❤️用过白屿公益的都知道 ❤️全局不闪退 ❤️我们坐拥自抓稳定的旁路 ❤️内部无二次收费！ ❤️内部价23元 ❤️白屿频道 @YXyyds ❤️公益频道 @YXyyds66 ❤️加入内部联系 @YXnb666 ❤️收满40人锁群
Signed 屿汐『关机抓防第一人』『TACY副董』
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @MKQAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,280,432 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MKQAQ named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️MK广告频道❤️” (@MKQAQ), 532 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MKQAQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.