有快手的 扫码助力 是个号就能扫 新号也行 然后带着成功截图 找我拿30红包🧧 几个号都行 无限要♾️ 联系 @EGGE888 直接发成功截图 不用问我真的假的 成功截图直接发给我就行
👍8
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】

Channel
@KK666YYDSNB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,790subscribers
+206 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846299617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KK666YYDSNB |
| Description | KK直装 @KK666YYDSNB KK内核 @KKYYDS666NB 频道主 @zixinnb |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KK666YYDSNB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 32,790 | -53 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 32,843 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 32,868 | -40 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 32,908 | +432 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 32,476 | -39 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 32,515 | -45 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 32,560 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 32,584 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 32,584 | first reading |
98 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 98 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,009 |
| Reactions total | 974 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
974 reactions across 97 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 762 | 78.2% | |
| ❤ | 78 | 8.01% | |
| 🤝 | 31 | 3.18% | |
| 🤩 | 18 | 1.85% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 1.13% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 0.924% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 0.821% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 0.821% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 0.821% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.821% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.719% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.411% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.308% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.205% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.205% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.205% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.103% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 974reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
有快手的 扫码助力 是个号就能扫 新号也行 然后带着成功截图 找我拿30红包🧧 几个号都行 无限要♾️ 联系 @EGGE888 直接发成功截图 不用问我真的假的 成功截图直接发给我就行
👍8
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
一天上一个检测谁来了也没用 如果天天解决那就天天发安装包 云更新的话太费钱了
👍20
Signed 相遇 小号
等老外抓旁路
👍17
Signed 自信
不更新的原因 1.检测天天上更新了也只能稳定一时
👍9
Signed 相遇 小号
来几个人发短信 一条一块钱 只要5个人 速度来人 一个手机号能发二三百条 秒发秒结账 联系二哥 @EGGE888 双向联系 @ergesx_bot
👍5
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
一个手机一张卡 来几个人给顺丰快递公司帮发短信 发一组短信100块钱 发一组短信100块钱 发一组短信100块钱 正规短信 正规短信 正规短信 无风险不封卡 发的联系 @EGGE888 双向联系:@ErGesx_bot 结算记录 https://t.me/+z7YrBFn9lcEzNmI1
❤1👍1
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
现在送20个数据号 和20个天卡 先到先得 先到先得 过时不候 过时不候 联系 @EGGE888 领取 手慢无! 现在送20个数据号 和20个天卡 先到先得 先到先得 过时不候 过时不候 联系 @EGGE888 领取 手慢无!
👍9❤1
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
现在送20个数据号 和20个天卡 先到先得 先到先得 过时不候 过时不候 联系 @EGGE888 领取 手慢无! 现在送20个数据号 和20个天卡 先到先得 先到先得 过时不候 过时不候 联系 @EGGE888 领取 手慢无!
👍9🍌1
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
一个手机一张卡 来几个人给顺丰快递公司帮发短信 发一组短信100块钱 发一组短信100块钱 发一组短信100块钱 正规短信 正规短信 正规短信 无风险不封卡 发的联系 @EGGE888 双向联系:@ErGesx_bot 结算记录 https://t.me/+z7YrBFn9lcEzNmI1
👍5❤2🤔1
Signed 二哥【狂爆版】
牛逼呀我去 我已准备领取遗产🤓
👍12
Signed 相遇 《鸽子王》
在给你们测试
👍24☃1❤1❤🔥1🍌1🤓1
Signed 自信
🔤🔤🔤🔤户籍猎手已公益 全网独一家 ⬇️手机号定位 ⬇️支付宝码反 ⬇️电百 联通 移动反 ❄️补齐身份证/手机号 ❄️个人大头 ❄️真/假地址 🛡手机号反姓名 🛡全国常用号 🛡v反/Q反三件套 🖥刑侦全户 🖥短信轰炸 📱无违规永久思路 🛰️无违规概率永久思路 🖥新增几个功能:ai脱换衣,破解梯子大全,酒店摄像直播,照片人脸扫描,精准模糊猎魔... 点我进入频道获取卡密 点我进入频道获取卡密
👍6
Signed 频道主全网收管理@oouo888
Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @KK666YYDSNB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 108,631 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KK主频道——冲刺40K 🇨🇳” (@KK666YYDSNB), 32,790 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KK666YYDSNB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.