Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MINORITY REPORT

Channel

MINORITY REPORT

@MINORITYREPORTz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,604subscribers

+674 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001798897108
TypeChannel
Username@MINORITYREPORTz
DescriptionGLOBAL SECURITY GOVERNANCE FOUNDATION
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MINORITYREPORTz

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MINORITYREPORTz/3244 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC@hyperboreaX/460232 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hyperboreaX6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 53 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,9257,6047,264.56 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,929 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,925 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,938 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,948 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,950 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,983 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,025 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,028 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,029 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,061 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,068 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,082 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,107 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,127 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,117 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,115 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,124 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,123 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,140 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,135 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,133 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,126 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,312 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,569 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,587 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,604 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 96 days, net +674. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,823–7,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 00:477,604+17
6 Nov 2026, 15:097,587+18
3 Nov 2026, 21:567,569+257
31 Oct 2026, 13:497,312+186
28 Oct 2026, 14:497,126-7
25 Oct 2026, 20:087,133-2
23 Oct 2026, 03:187,135-5
20 Oct 2026, 10:517,140+17
17 Oct 2026, 17:497,123-1
14 Oct 2026, 10:067,124+9
10 Oct 2026, 15:157,115-2
4 Oct 2026, 21:167,117-10
25 Sept 2026, 08:167,127+20
17 Sept 2026, 04:207,107+25
13 Sept 2026, 09:157,082+14
9 Sept 2026, 18:217,068+7
4 Sept 2026, 14:217,061+32
31 Aug 2026, 22:057,029+1
28 Aug 2026, 16:537,028+3
25 Aug 2026, 19:427,025first reading

Engagement

119 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.6%
avg views ÷ 7,604 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,380
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 119 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held119 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total218,917
Reactions total2,964
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈605
Videos
≈2,260
Links
≈23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 34m
Average length
2m 57s

Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,229 reactions across 113 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,50435.6%
🤔73817.5%
❤63114.9%
👍3788.94%
😁2816.64%
💯2175.13%
👀1503.55%
🤣681.61%
🥰420.993%
❤‍🔥380.899%
🆒290.686%
😢250.591%
😱230.544%
👏220.52%
🤯140.331%
🤷‍♀80.189%
✍50.118%
🏆50.118%
👎50.118%
😍50.118%
18 further kinds410.969%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,372 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 119 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MINORITYREPORTz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 119 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (6.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 05:08 UTC647 views22 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Former UFC champion Merab Dvalishvili was attacked by Usman Nurmagomedov and a group of associates during an interview at a hotel in Abu Dhabi. Footage shows Nurmagomedov approaching from behind and striking Dvalishvili, sparking a brawl.

😁17🤡4👍1

11 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,180 views100 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Burrowing Owl 🦉

❤77👍10🥰10😁2🤩1

11 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC≈8,760 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Inca Museum in Cusco, Peru 🇵🇪 👀

🆒12❤10🤯1

10 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,970 views94 reactionsread 12 November 2026

«Английский — это фонетически обращённый (перевёрнутый) иврит». Поэтому, гематрия = английский, как дополнение к ивриту

🔥43🤔43👍3🤯3❤2

10 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈4,780 views42 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

English Is Phonetically Reversed Hebrew

🔥42

10 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,580 views94 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Nothing out of the ordinary—it's just that kids in Indonesia are riding a huge mesh python instead of a slide 👀 That's childhood without cell phones.

🤣50🔥21👀10❤6🙈4😢3

10 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,480 views75 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Pandas are born looking like baby badgers – furless and pink.

❤58🥰14🔥2😁1

9 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,600 views71 reactionsread 12 November 2026

The video concept is correct. Whoever made it /this video/ ... "these" scenes were show to them....

🤔37🔥21👍6❤3💯2🤯1😁1

9 Nov 2026, 13:39 UTC≈11,600 views83 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Elohim

🤔46🔥22👍8❤2👎2🌚1😐1🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @MINORITYREPORTz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Хранители и Вершители
@alphaingenium · 103,820
78 posts
Злой эколог
@zloyecolog · 112,019
16 posts
Одесса Zа Победу! ⚓️
@OdessaRussi · 22,927
9 posts
©™ Евгения Жаркова
@EvgeniaZharkovaLAW · 10,445
4 posts
Genesis and more ❤️Ana
@InTheLoveitsnofear · 8,096
4 posts
НЛО Атака инопланетян
@UFOattack · 13,309
3 posts
Āgenskalna klīnika
@Agenskalnaklinika · 2,199
1 post
БИОДИНАМИКА ВСЕМ🌱🌙🌝🌻🌿
@biodynamiks · 190
1 post
Творческая мастерская
@Cuprumopus · 29
1 post
Реабилитолог • Валерий Васильев
@drvaleriyvasilyev · 648
1 post
Иван🌲
@ecopaceka · 16
1 post
Hyperborea
@hyperboreaX · 58,274
1 post
🐏 💉БаранамВирус 🦠🧬🤖
@KontrChip · 266
1 post
Что происходит с планетой
@last2004 · 565
1 post
Магия Безсмертия
@magicimmortal · 100
1 post
💖Ментальное целительство (Ольга Рябова)💖
@olgaelkafon · 160
1 post
Русский МИР против фашизма !
@rusvmire · 70
1 post
Знакомства Москва Чат Любовь Серьезные Отношения Флирт Ищу тебя Девушку Парня Женщину Мужчину Гороскоп Содержанки Спонсоры Фото
@sexygirlsmsk · 46
1 post
Spēkavots
@spekavots · 397
1 post
Живая Жизнь - библиотека
@studia_massaga_nikolay · 14
1 post
🔥 Всё Есть Ом Мани Падме Хум 🔥
@svarpes · 136
1 post
ЭкоКлуб
@vamvselo · 47
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MINORITY REPORT” (@MINORITYREPORTz), 7,604 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MINORITYREPORTz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.