Channel
@MDVgroup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,299subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001199738566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MDVgroup |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MDVgroup |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 3,299 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 3,300 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 3,299 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 3,299 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,042 |
| Reactions total | 108 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
108 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 81.5% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 13.0% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در پی سوءاستفاده (اکسپلویت) از Coldcard، تعداد آدرسهای فعال بیتکوین به ۰.۹۸ میلیون در روز جهش کرد که بالاترین رقم از دسامبر ۲۰۲۴ تاکنون محسوب میشه. گلسنود با نمودار زیر نشون میده این فعالیت درونزنجیرهای (on-chain) ناشی از ترس است. اقدام دارندگان برای انتقال عبارتهای بازیابی (seed) و جابهجایی داراییها به روشهای نگهداری جایگزین، واکنشی در راستای امنیت عملیاتی است، نه تغییری در باور و دیدگاه کلی بازار.
❤4
رگرسیون چرخه بیتکوین نشون میده سهماه تا پایان چرخه نزولی و خرسی بیتکوین باقی مونده، سقوط چرخه فعلی به نسبت گذشته کمتر بوده و این روند در صورت تکرار در ۹۰ روز پایانی ممکنه بیتکوین رو تا ۴۷ هزار دلار هم برسونه. به دفعات نامتناهی قرار نیست تکرار چرخه و قابل پیشبینی بودن اون ثابت بشه پس احتمال نقض یکی از این دو گزاره محتمله، ممکنه خط افقی که زمان و تکرار چرخه هستش نقض بشه یا خط عمودی که درصد ریزش و بازار خرسی هست…
❤6
این نمودار که بلومبرگ ۲۰۲۴ منتشر کرد حاکی از عملکرد مثبت صبحگاهی بازارهای پرریسک از جمله بیتکوین و شاخص سهامهای آمریکاس که خب یعنی آدما صبحها احتمالا چون انرژی بیشتری دارن و سرحال هستن معمولا بیشتر ریسک میکنن پس بازدهی این داراییها بیشتر بوده.
❤4
احتمالات بازار پیشبینی، احتمالات واقعی نیستن؛ احتمالات جمعی میتونه دچار انواع سوگیری ذاتی باشه که به خطا منجر بشه. بازارهای پیشبینی اغلب به دلیل قابلیت تجمیع اطلاعات و تبدیل انتظارات جمعی به یک قیمت واحد، مورد تحسین قرار میگیرن. شاید توی نگاه سادهانگارانه تصور بشه که این قیمتها باید با احتمالات دنیای واقعی مطابقت داشته باشن و بهترین برآورد موجود از احتمال وقوع یک رویداد رو بازتاب بدن. با این حال، حتی با فرض عقل…
❤3
نمودار زیر همگرایی بین شاخص سهامهای کوچک هند رو با بیتکوین نمایش میده؛ در چندسال اخیر این همگرایی برجستهتر خودشو نشون داده. میانگین رشد این شاخص سهامهای کوچک هندی اگه مثبت بشه طوریکه همزمان بیتکوین رشد نکرده باشه میتونه نشونهای از چشمانداز مثبت برای کریپتو باشه.
❤3🙏1
«نظرسنجی پذیرش رمزارز در دانمارک (۲۰۲۶)» تصویری مثبت از روند مالکیت رمزارزها در این کشور ارائه میده و نشوندهنده افزایش ۶۰ هزار نفری تعداد مالکان نسبت به نظرسنجی سال گذشته هست. چند نکته مهم: ۵۱۰ هزار بزرگسال در دانمارک اکنون مالک رمزارز هستن (معادل ۱۰ درصد از جمعیت بزرگسال). برآورد میشه ارزش داراییهای رمزارزی در دانمارک به ۳۸ میلیارد کرون (یا ۵.۸۸ میلیارد دلار) میرسه. ۲۶ درصد از بزرگسالان دانمارکی انتظار دارن که …
❤3
به همین بهونهی return to tradition، از ۳۰۰ ارز برتر coinmarketcap در تاریخ فوریه ۲۰۲۴ برآیند تا امروز رو خروجی گرفتم که نشون میده: - میانگین ۸۸.۱۱٪ ریزش رو تجربه کردن. - از ۳۰۰ ارز فقط ۳۰ مورد تا امروز برآیند مثبت داشتن که این موارد هم میانگین ۵۰٪ بازدهی داشتن؛ نشون میده ۲۶۰ ارز تو این دو سال ۸۸٪ ریزش رو میانگین تجربه کردن در حالیکه ۳۰ مورد میانگین ۵۰٪ بازدهی مثبت داشتن و ۱۰ مورد هم برآیند صفر!
❤7
🟡نرخ تتر: 193,350 تومان هر تتر معادل ۱۳۰۰۰ تومان بود کانال را افتتاح و شروع کردم. امروز ۱۹۳۳۵۰ تومان به ازای هر تتر کمتر از ۶ سال!
🙏4❤1
مقاله رو کامل ترجمه نکردم و سعی کردم خلاصه اولیهای قرار بدم که اگر علاقهمند هستید از لینک اصلی مطالعه کنید. ماهیت ذاتی بیتکوین از درگیری این دو طیف Big blockers و Small blockers شکل گرفت که نتیجهی اون، چرخش از پول نقد دیجیتال به طلای دیجیتال بود، چرخشی که مورد توافق قرار گرفت و در طول زمان هم نشون داده شد هدف اصلی بیتکوین، پرچمداری طلای دیجیتاله و در اولویت بعدی با لایتنینگ و سایر روشهای موجود روش پرداخت سریع و…
❤3
تفاوت اصلی دیدگاه آنها چیست؟ راجر ور (Roger Ver) معتقد است که در سطح فنی، هر دو طرف اختلاف را تقریباً به یک شکل میبینند: حامیان بلاک کوچک (Small Blockers) معتقدند که مهمترین اولویت، ساده و ارزان بودن اجرای نود (Node) است تا هر کاربر عادی بتواند شبکه را مستقل تأیید کند. حامیان بلاک بزرگ (Big Blockers) معتقدند که مهمترین اولویت، کارمزد پایین تراکنشها است تا استفاده از بیتکوین برای همه مقرونبهصرفه بماند. هر د…
❤2
به روایت راجر ور، بلاکرهای بزرگ جنگ اندازه بلاک را چگونه میدیدند؟ بلاکرهای بزرگ عموماً بر یک سوال کلیدی در سطح شیء تمرکز میکنند: بیتکوین قرار است چه باشد؟ آیا قرار است یک ذخیره ارزش - طلای دیجیتال، یا وسیله پرداخت - پول نقد دیجیتال باشد؟ برای آنها، از همان ابتدا برای همه روشن بود که دیدگاه اصلی و دیدگاهی که بلاکرهای بزرگ همگی برای آن ثبت نام کردند، پول نقد دیجیتال بود. حتی در وایت پیپر هم همین را میگوید! آنها هم…
❤3
توافقنامه نیویورک که در سال ۲۰۱۷ توسط صرافیهای بزرگ بیتکوین، پردازشگرهای پرداخت، استخراجکنندگان و سایر شرکتها امضا شد، نمونهای کلیدی از اقدامی است که طرفداران بلوکهای کوچک (Small Blockers)، آن را تلاشی برای تغییر حاکمیت بیتکوین از دست کاربران به دست یک باند شرکتی میدانند.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MDVgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 337,975 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خروس وال استریت” (@MDVgroup), 3,299 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MDVgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.