Channel
@MDSX118
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,922subscribers
+10,113 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002054360090 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MDSX118 |
| Description | 聚焦东南亚华人最新资讯、突发事件与真实生活 🔍 第一时间掌握东南亚热点事件 🗣 分享海外华人生活百态与经验故事 🆘 提供求助信息，建立真实互助社群 📬 投稿+商务： @u66666c 💬 交流聊天群： @SM13145 #东南亚 #缅甸 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MDSX118 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 14,922 | -48 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 14,970 | -31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 15,001 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 15,023 | -56 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 15,079 | -50 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 15,129 | -72 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 15,201 | -75 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 15,276 | -205 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 15,481 | +10,691 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 4,790 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 4,810 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 4,809 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 4,809 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (16 June 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 148,611 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#马来西亚讯 巴生 Meru 大巴刹展开移民执法行动 外籍人士身份受查 马来西亚移民局 昨晚在雪兰莪州巴生（Klang）Meru 大巴刹展开执法行动，对当地外籍人士及商贩进行身份检查。 行动期间，移民执法人员进入巴刹范围，对现场人员进行证件核查，并重点检查是否存在逾期逗留、非法工作以及违反移民条例等情况。 据悉，执法单位在行动中检查了多名外籍人士的护照及相关准证资料，部分人员因无法出示有效证件而被进一步调查。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#网友投稿 🇻🇳越南胡志明“9郡 美食街 ”警察正在检查，没有证件暂时不要过去，刚刚已经有人被带走了！ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#网友投稿 生活在东南亚这个圈子你们需要知道的事 一、生活不能等待别人来安排，要自己去争取和奋斗。而不论其结果是喜是悲，但可以慰藉的是，你总不枉在这世界上活了一场。 二、如果有缘，错过了还会重来；如果无缘，相遇了也会离开。聚有聚的理由，离有离的借口，人生没有如果，只有后果和结果。 三、活得清醒的人，容易烦恼；活得糊涂的人，容易幸福。清醒的人看得太真切，凡事太过较真，烦恼无处不在；而糊涂的人，不知如何计较，虽然简单粗糙，却因此觅得人生的大境界。 四、好好珍惜那些真正对你好的人，不必让他们逐渐从你的生活中消失，不管爱情还是友情，不去经营，都会形同陌路。 五、对于大多数人，生活有两种选择，要么走艰辛一点的上坡路，迎着风和各种压力；要么就走轻松容易一点的下坡路，过索然无味的一生。 六、人立于世需有三种品质：有肚量，有胆量，能商量。有肚量，就是有大格局，看得宽看得开。有胆量，就是能不畏惧，迈得开走得稳。能商量，就是个性温和，…
#网友整理 木姐105码事件 有多少人能跑路，有多少人会被抓 缅甸木姐从8月份开始就有部分公司开始转移员工，只是最近一个星期缅兵又加强了抓查打电诈的外国人才逼迫大量公司紧急撤离。 我们公司是在木姐105这边从8月9号接到缅兵排长的报信后当晚就先行转移了30几个技术和财务到孟巴这边的民房。 后面每天晚上都有几辆中小货车转移几十个员工和设备也是送到孟巴孟马地区的民房里面，这个转移一直持续了9天才把不到300员工和设备全部的从105地区转移出来了。 棒塞方向也有几十个人的小公司转移到那边的山腰上住着打野，腊戌那边就有几百人的大公司转移去了，他们不敢搬进腊戌城区只是搬在腊戌郊区那些三五层的自建房和仓库里面。 往南坎兴威腊戌的主干道上每天都有缅兵小队设卡拦截来往车辆的外国人，偶尔一辆外国人的车没有护照证件的当场给钱后放行问题不大，如果一批有好几辆车上十个外国人查到没有护照的话那就行不通当场给钱都很难放行，因为这些缅兵分属不同的…
#网友投稿 #我要曝光一个渣男，福建省泉州市安溪县人李铭灿，飞机网名叫做人生，福建人26岁。 公司老板和主管以及其他管理和人员也是福建人、闽南地区，公司在 #金水园区1栋办公，后面搬到波贝。公司有100多个中国人。 公司主要做的是国内电商诈骗和精聊盘诈骗，诈骗了无数中国人的血汗钱，简直是深情共愤，每天工作16个小时以上，公司经常殴打和体罚员工，是臭名昭著的黑公司 李铭灿长期玩弄女生感情，同时到处聊多名越南女人，照片和飞机爆出来后相信知道这个人跟很多人都聊过。 本人在恋爱期间给他买过无数次吃的和其他礼物，但这个人整天就是吹牛画饼欺骗女孩子感情，从不知道珍惜和不懂责任，只喜欢到处聊女孩子，还喜欢占女孩子的便宜，希望认识他的人都要小心。这个渣男一个， 和我谈恋爱的时候出轨了一次，后面来找我又复合了。我也是太恋爱脑了，就选择再给他一次机会。 谈了要有一年了，这不是在跑路吗？他们没有待在一起住。 TM 的，短短几天内又出轨了…
#被拉壮丁青年跳车逃脱 一名被军方强行抓捕征兵的青年，在被押运途中突然从军车跳下，成功逃脱。现场视频在社交网络热传，网友纷纷为他的脱险感到庆幸。 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#大环境下的博彩行业现状 现在的环境下，监管、合规、资金流、人员背景以及实际控制关系等因素的重要性越来越高。随着博彩市场整体进入下行周期，监管审查趋严，反洗钱、反犯罪以及企业合规要求不断强化，过去那种粗放式经营的空间正在越来越小。 过去拼的是胆量、资金和关系；现在拼的是合规、专业、组织能力、独家优势、核心壁垒以及持续经营的能力。 尤其是以下几种模式，正在越来越难以适应新的市场环境： 家族亲属模式：重要岗位首先考虑“是不是自己家人”，而不是能力和专业。 任人唯亲模式：管理层形成封闭圈子，外部专业人才难以进入，内部也缺乏有效制衡。 大撒币模式：习惯用高投入、高补贴、高成本换规模，却没有真正稳定、可持续的商业模式。 守株待兔模式：坐等大客户送钱、坐等市场回暖，不主动提升产品、渠道、服务和管理能力。 一言堂模式：过去“说谁行谁就行，不行也能行”，但在监管和市场环境不断变化的今天，个人权威已经很难替代制度、专业和规范化管理。…
#缅媒报道 涉诈及人口贩运！妙瓦底17名涉案分子被上海检方提起公诉 该跨国犯罪集团利用“海外高薪工作”为诱饵，诱骗并强行将受害者（主要为中国公民）绑架带至缅甸妙瓦底，强迫其从事网络诈骗（“电诈”/“狗推”）。 受害者在此期间遭受殴打、虐待、强奸及强迫卖淫等严重暴力侵害 此案与2025年初引发广泛关注的中国演员王星（Wang Xing）被拐案密切相关。当时王星受“拍摄邀请”前往泰国后失联，随后在缅边境被救出 泰国警方此前曾逮捕并向中方移交10名与王星案相关的嫌疑人。目前尚不确定这10人是否包含在本次被公诉的17名被告中。检方通报中暂未透露被告人的国籍信息 根据中国现行法律，涉及贩卖妇女、绑架及加重抢劫罪等严重犯罪，最高可被判处无期徒刑甚至死刑。 近年来，中方持续加大与东南亚多国的执法合作力度，严厉打击跨境电诈及人口贩运犯罪 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#群友投稿：金悦汇附近一个路边摊 一群越南妹妹打起来了，听说是因为抢客户，都是小姐。 PS：女人何必为难女人，这架挺白🤣 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#网友反馈：下周一开始，老挝特内会有大检查，据说这次是老挝和国内的联合执法 打野的小心点，能停工最好，这次要是被逮住了就不是轧带了，直接上银手镯 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
#菲律宾资讯：CICC研究建议封禁Facebook，Meta若继续不配合或面临更大监管压力 8月22日，CICC负责人帕赖索表示，如果Meta继续不遵守菲律宾相关规定和法律，CICC正研究向政府提出封禁Facebook的建议，菲律宾目前尚未作出正式封锁决定。 这轮风波与8月18日三宝颜市发生的校园枪击案有关。袭击过程当时被人在Facebook直播，CICC在直播开始约5分钟后发现视频并向Meta举报，但相关画面又持续约7至9分钟才被删除，整段直播持续约14分钟。 8月20日参议院听证会上，Meta没有派代表出席，再次引起菲律宾方面不满。平台处理暴力直播的速度，以及与菲律宾政府之间的配合问题，都成为质询重点。 菲律宾信息与通信技术部长阿古达与帕赖索计划于8月27日前往新加坡，与Meta亚太地区高管会面，讨论暴力内容、选举公正、虚假信息以及双方执法合作等问题。如果这次会面仍无法解决分歧，Meta在菲律宾面临的监管压力还可能继…
#印度18岁少年因无力偿还iPhone分期款轻生，一家三口劝阻过程中不幸坠崖身亡 8月21日，印度马哈拉施特拉邦发生一起令人痛心的坠崖事件。 一名18岁青年因无力偿还iPhone分期付款，与家人发生争执后情绪失控，站上山崖边缘威胁轻生。最终在家人、村民及警方长时间劝阻过程中，悲剧发生，导致一家三口全部身亡。 救援人员赶到后确认，三人均已无生命迹象。目前，当地警方已对事件展开调查。 👉🏻视频跳转👈🏻 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🐦关注频道不迷路 📹 吃瓜娱乐 🌐投稿爆料
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @MDSX118. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MDSX118 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“International News” (@MDSX118), 14,922 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MDSX118.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.