Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东山杂货铺 & TG Service Center

Channel

东山杂货铺 & TG Service Center

@tgdk6

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

14,604subscribers

-850 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002739230911
TypeChannel
Usernames@dongshan888 @tgdk6
Description高级会员代开、刷粉、点赞、拉人、浏览等!长期合作的滴滴🚸省心省事快速专业 联系客服 @v9911 NFT典藏挑选 @nft749 会员表情/贴纸 @dsnice
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgdk6

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,800 average views per post against 14,735 subscribers — an engagement rate of 73.3%. Across the 2,434 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,603 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.69% and 10.9%, with a median of 4.47%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (21 July 2026 20 August 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (1 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled129,611
Mature posts only79.8% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,735 measured 20 August 2026
Cohortb10000:zho · 2,434 channels · p10 0.507% · p25 1.69% · p50 4.47% · p75 10.9% · p90 21.8%
Position in cohort99.014th percentile · 16.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.203% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,60415,45415,0297 August 2026 — 15,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,370 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,310 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,227 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,213 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,202 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,113 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,076 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,076 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,026 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,952 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,874 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,759 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,746 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,743 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,735 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,736 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,688 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,604 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,604 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 15 days, net -850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,477–15,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 21:3414,604no change
22 Aug 2026, 15:4414,604-84
21 Aug 2026, 14:5514,688-48
21 Aug 2026, 03:0514,736+1
20 Aug 2026, 16:3814,735-8
19 Aug 2026, 14:3514,743-3
18 Aug 2026, 20:0614,746-13
18 Aug 2026, 13:0514,759-68
17 Aug 2026, 18:3514,827no change
17 Aug 2026, 10:2514,827-47
16 Aug 2026, 18:1914,874-78
15 Aug 2026, 20:3814,952-74
15 Aug 2026, 04:0415,026-50
14 Aug 2026, 19:1515,076no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:0415,076-37
13 Aug 2026, 17:3715,113-89
12 Aug 2026, 17:4415,202-11
11 Aug 2026, 18:3515,213-14
10 Aug 2026, 15:4215,227-83
9 Aug 2026, 15:3315,310first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 15 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.4%
avg views ÷ 14,604 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,410
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.014%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held24 (15 March 202620 August 2026)
Views total103,521
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
59
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
872.7%
👍218.2%
🌚19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC211 viewsread 20 August 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 A. 上海包养❗深圳包养❗香港包养❗澳门包养 📢 【哪吒香烟】香烟丨免税香烟 📢 杭州西湖阁 📢 成人漫画视频_精彩视频 📢 【自由话术】|精聊话术|话术素材|打粉话术 📢 义乌榜 📢 【ws群发】WhatsApp群发、WS打粉、WS超级号 📢 开户查档源头渠道 📢 111 频道 📢 长沙宁乡必刷榜1.0🔥🔥🔥 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

13 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 23 August 2026

🎉 恭喜本频道 已被 @soso 收录,点击下方按钮⚡️ 为Ta助力,提升排名吧!

12 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈5,400 viewsread 23 August 2026

🤐😃😊😗🔤🔤9️⃣9️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 会员表情包1 🪩🌼🎯🚲📸 会员表情包2 📣✅🔥😄⭐ 会员表情包3 🍏🧭🏠🔋🧠 会员表情包4 🥺😰😕😒☹ 会员表情包5 🌟⚡🌟🌟🌟 会员表情包6 📱📱📱📱📱 会员表情包7 🥰⚡🥥⚡☹ 会员表情包8 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 会员表情包9 ⚙➕🗑👁📷 会员表情包10 🌸💭🍙🍬↗ 表情包合集 @dsnice

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈13,100 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🔜 全球手机话费充值|全网低价 😂 USDT 支付更方便,单号充值、批量充值、号码自动识别,一站式全部搞定! 🌍 覆盖全球 158 个国家及地区 ⚡ 操作简单,充值快速 🪙 价格透明,低价实惠 🔜 立即充值话费:@dongshan88

5 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🅰️ 认证申请条件 申请前必须满足以下条件: 频道必须属于你本人(申请人必须是频道 群主)。 频道订阅人数不少于 10000 人。 Telegram 必须更新到最新版。 整个审核期间,不能修改频道 群主。 要把频道名字改成英文 申请期间踢出管理员,只保留群主。 申请频道同款 🅰️ ,永久有效 。 售价:68u (赠送1w粉丝) 联系: @dongshan88

4 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈6,950 viewsread 23 August 2026

收藏礼物nft 🐸 🐸 青蛙pepe ❤ 心锁 🧢 杜洛夫的帽子 🎁 海盗手 📎 钉子手链 🎁 强壮的手臂 🪖 英雄头盔 🍑 桃子 💎 星光碎片 🏆 迷你奥斯卡 🌹 香水瓶 🧪 魔法药水 👄 性感嘴唇 💎 离子晶体 💍 宝石印章 💍 相连戒指 😺 惊吓猫 🧞‍♂‍ 精灵灯 🎁 LV包包 ☠ 电动头颅 🎁 跑车 ⌚ ️手表 🐸 亲吻癞蛤蟆 🎁 雪茄 🏍 猫耳头盔 🧸 小熊 📍 诅咒娃娃 🌹 永恒玫瑰 🎩 高顶礼帽 🧹 飞天扫帚 🎁 钻戒 🖤 跳动的心 🔔 铃铛 🎵 唱片机 🔮 水晶球 🎁 史努比雪茄 🎀 领结 🍓 草莓盒 ❤ 情人节盒子 👀 眼球 🎇 仙女棒 ps:所有礼物代购都只收取2~4u手续费,无额外费用。更多礼物前往挑选区 @nft749

3 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈15,200 viewsread 23 August 2026

🤪😃💿💾📹⌛️ ⭐ 3个月:13u ⭐ 6个月:18u ⭐12个月:33u 🥵 联系:@dongshan88

30 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC≈7,680 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

来自 Telegram 和 Durov 的致政府的留言:🖕

30 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC≈14,200 viewsread 23 August 2026

CHATGPT 代充服务 GO · 12U / 月 轻量使用,满足日常 AI 需求 PLUS · 25U / 月 更高使用额度,适合日常高频使用 PRO 5X · 130U / 月 更高阶的 AI 使用体验 GeminiPro . ClaudePro . SuperGork 开通 / 续费 → @dongshan88

27 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC≈14,300 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

✨ Hold 验证服务 💎 一个稳定的核心,连接四方,持续释放价值 ✅提高自身的关注度 👤更具有辨识度的认证身份标识 🙂要比同行更具有权威性 🪪 我们正式推出一项全新的Telegram验证服务,旨在为优质频道和用户提供更具辨识度的身份认证标识。您的个人资料或频道将获得一个不仅独特且引人注目,还能清晰区分的标识——所有人都能看到这个标识。✅ 💬 定价 个人:2,500 $ 频道/群:1,500 $ 机器人: 4,000 $ 💎频道/群组已开启月付模式 220U一个月 📷找我开通hold标识认证 助你业务无忧出道 🔔牛逼人做牛逼业务挂牛逼hold官方标识认证 @v9911 👑 MAJOR 🅰️ Telegram A+

2

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈26,800 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

【突发】Telegram出现漏洞,操作为:日本telegram号 登录官方版 目标用户名 直接右上角赠送就行 3月 6月 12月价格均为0.25u 10000星星1.5u。 已有部分账号出现销号状况, PS:大家谨慎操作。可以拿小号试一下。

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @tgdk6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tgdk6 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 933,548 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东山杂货铺 & TG Service Center” (@tgdk6), 14,604 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgdk6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.