3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:34
169
-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:01
170
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:00
170
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
20.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
20 (31 December 2025 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
20
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
38.4%
👍
21
28.8%
👏
12
16.4%
🙏
5
6.85%
🏆
3
4.11%
🎉
2
2.74%
👌
2
2.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#دانش_رابطه
🖋 مراحل دلکندن از منظر روانشناسی تحلیلی (Jungian / Depth Psychology)
در روانشناسی تحلیلی، دلکندن تصمیمِ آگاهانه نیست؛
یک فرآیند روانیِ ناخودآگاه است که اگر طی نشود، فرد «ظاهراً جدا» ولی «دروناً درگیر» میماند.
۱. مرحلهی شوک و انکار نمادین
(Shock & Symbolic Denial)
🔸 چه اتفاقی میافتد؟
روان هنوز تصویر رابطه را بهعنوان «واقعیت فعال» نگه داشته.
ناخودآگاه میگوید:
«این پایان نیست؛ فقط وقفه است.»
👌…
#اتاق_درمان_من
مراجع:
از وقتی فهمیدم خیانت کرده، دیگه هیچچیز سر جاش نیست. هم عصبانیام، هم دلم براش تنگه. حالم از خودم بههم میخوره که هنوز دوستش دارم.
درمانگر:
میخوام مکث کنیم همینجا.
تو همزمان دو تجربه داری: ضربهٔ خیانت و سوگِ از دست رفتن تصویر قبلی رابطه. این تناقض، نشانهٔ ضعف نیست؛ نشانهٔ عمق پیوند بوده.
مراجع:
اما حس میکنم اگه ببخشم، خودم رو بیارزش کردم.
درمانگر:
سؤال اصلی این نیست که ببخشی یا نه.
سؤال…
#رویا_نویس
#سرگردانی_احساسی
🖋سرگردانی احساسی (Emotional Ambivalence / Diffusion)
🖋یعنی حالتی که فرد میان چند احساسِ متضاد یا مبهم گیر میکند و ذهنش نمیتواند تصمیم بگیرد کدام احساس واقعاً «اصلی» است.
مثل وقتی هم دلتنگی داری، هم خشم، هم میلِ برگشت — و هیچکدام واضح نیستند.
🖋این سرگردانی احساسی نشانهی ضعف یا ناپختگی نیست؛ حاصلِ فعال شدن همزمانِ نیاز به دیدهشدن، ترس از عبور مرز، و تلاشِ ناتمامِ ذهن برای معنا دادن …
#دانش_رابطه
#عشق_دلبستگی_کشش
🖋عشق، دلبستگی و کشش جنسی سه زبان متفاوتاند،
که اگر با هم اشتباه گرفته شوند، آدمها را زخمی میکنند
و اگر درست کنار هم بنشینند،
انسان را بالغ میکنند.
🖋عشق آن جاییست که دیگری را میبینی،نه برای پر کردن خلا، بلکه برای بهاشتراکگذاشتن وفورِ خودت.
عشق میگوید:
«من تو را میخواهم،
نه چون بدون تو میمیرم،
بلکه چون با تو زندهترم.»
🖋دلبستگی اما حافظهی بدن است؛ جایی که امنیت یا ناامنی ذخیر…
منِ بهتر pinned «به نام خالق آگاهی دورد خدمت همراهان گرامی 📨 به اطلاع میرسانیم گردهمایی بیست و سوم، جمعه/۱/اسفند ماه برگزار خواهد شد. 📌 مکان گردهمایی: قم، بلوار صدوقی، خیابان امام حسین، پلاک ۳۴، دپارتمان آموزشی الماس اکسین. 🕘 زمان: ۱۱ الی ۱۳ یک ساعت آموزش یک ساعت تفریح…»
به نام خالق آگاهی
دورد خدمت همراهان گرامی
📨 به اطلاع میرسانیم
گردهمایی بیست و سوم، جمعه/۱/اسفند ماه
برگزار خواهد شد.
📌 مکان گردهمایی: قم، بلوار صدوقی، خیابان امام حسین، پلاک ۳۴، دپارتمان آموزشی الماس اکسین.
🕘 زمان: ۱۱ الی ۱۳
یک ساعت آموزش
یک ساعت تفریح و سرگرمی
عزیزانی که تصمیم به همراهی دارند ارسال پیامک به شماره زیر الزامیست:
📲 ۰۹۱۹۲۹۰۹۱۴۷
گروه آموزشی منِ بهتر
@MANBEHTAR03
#رویا_نویس
در حال مطالعه کتابِ " مارسل پروست و نشانه ها، اثر ژیل #دلوز بودم که با یک تعریف عجیب از عشق مواجه شدم. خواندم و تحلیل کردم بارها و بارها... و نتیجه آن شد، این:👇
- دلوز : برای آنکه از زنی رنج بکشیم، باید به او ایمانِ کامل داشته باشیم.
- تحلیل رویا : ما از کسی آسیب میبینیم که به او معنا دادهایم. کسی که فقط یک آدمِ معمولیست، نمیتواند ما را عمیقاً برنجاند.
رنج، نتیجهی باور است؛ باور به اینکه "او مهم …
#دلم_بر_روی_دستانم_جان_میدهد
🖋بخش بزرگی از خستگی روانی این روزهای ما از سوگی میآید که نامگذاری نشده است؛ سوگِ امنیت، سوگِ آیندهی قابل پیشبینی، سوگِ اعتماد و گاهی سوگِ خودِ قبلیمان.
🖋وقتی سوگ دیده نمیشود، به شکل فرسودگی، بیحسی یا خشم پراکنده بروز میکند.
🖋جامعهای تابآور است که بداند حالِ بدِ جمعی، نشانهی ضعف نیست، نشانهی زندهبودن است. وقتی مردم بفهمند تنها نیستند، شرمِ رنج کاهش پیدا میکند. گفتن از خستگ…
به نام خالق آگاهی
دورد خدمت همراهان گرامی
📨 به اطلاع میرسانیم
گردهمایی بیست و دوم، جمعه/۲۴/بهمن ماه
برگزار خواهد شد.
📌 مکان گردهمایی: قم، بلوار صدوقی، خیابان امام حسین، پلاک ۳۴، دپارتمان آموزشی الماس اکسین.
🕘 زمان: ۱۱ الی ۱۳
عزیزانی که تصمیم به همراهی دارند ارسال پیامک به شماره زیر الزامیست:
📲 ۰۹۱۹۲۹۰۹۱۴۷
گروه آموزشی منِ بهتر
❤3
Signed Roya Afshar "R.alef"
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MANBEHTAR03. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 912,693 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منِ بهتر” (@MANBEHTAR03), 169 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MANBEHTAR03.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
