Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Likopaz

@Likopaz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003810250369
TypeChannel
Username@Likopaz
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Likopaz

Growth

219222220.57 August 2026 — 222 subscribers8 August 2026 — 222 subscribers15 August 2026 — 219 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 219–222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:45219-3
8 Aug 2026, 10:32222no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:30222first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4036.7%
🤡2321.1%
👎87.34%
💩76.42%
🔥65.50%
💯43.67%
🙏43.67%
🤪32.75%
🤯32.75%
👍21.83%
💔21.83%
😍21.83%
😭21.83%
💘10.917%
😁10.917%
😱10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC173 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

не понимаю дизлайки к посту. с чем связаны и чем обоснованы. может быть просто надо подробнее посты делать, чтобы было объяснение?

💩1🤡1

1 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈3,720 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Насколько приятен тот факт, что с самого рождения нам повезло родиться в России.

👎8🤡6🔥42👍2

1 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC≈3,780 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

"Очень горжусь тем, что у нас самый гейский парламент. Я думаю, не только за всё время, но и где-либо в мире. Не думаю, что существует какой-либо парламент, который был бы более гейским, чем этот" — содомит Кир Стармер подвел итоги своего правления Британией *лгбт признано экстремистской организацией и запрещено в РФ

30 Jun 2026, 21:59 UTC≈3,730 viewsread 8 August 2026

самое время подумать о действительно перспективных инвестициях. и это - велосипед. и мобильно, и без проблем, и для здоровья полезно. О проблемах с лишним весом и подсчете калорий можно будет забыть.

4 Jun 2026, 12:05 UTC≈13,200 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Он прав! На самом деле , у нас очень большая национальность и перспектива. Очень огромные перспективы. Мы очень талантливая и умная страна. Нужно реализовывать потенциал. Нужны хорошие книги, хорошие примеры, а главное хорошие преподаватели. Нужно поднимать экономику и это сделать действительно возможно. Просто нужен новый взгляд на капитализм. А к экономике нужно подойти с любовью. И нежно и аккуратно парировать.

1

4 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC378 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу научиться бегать. Начал пробовать развивать привычку бегать. Никогда не получалось, всегда дыхалка умерла на первых 100 метрах. Но мне кажется бег, и в целом кардио должны быть полезны. НО это очень сложно. Но решил совмещать приятное с полезным. Пробую включать подкасты, и слушать пока бегу. В целом - интересный опыт. Единственно подкасты не понятно где искать. Я просто уже в телеграмме даже голосовые сохраня

3🔥1

25 May 2026, 11:37 UTC386 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Налог на дивиденды до 35% ------------------------- Инициатива предложения поступила от «Справедливой России» и Сергея Миронова. «Дания — 42%, Южная Корея — 44,5%, Великобритания — 39,35%, Германия — 26, 37%, США от 20% до 37%. Наши богачи платят в три раза меньше, пора это исправить. ------------------------- Примечательно то, что один из актуальных вопросов, это привлечение денежных средств на фондовый рынок. Любоп

2

10 Apr 2026, 21:22 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Патриотизм, крепкая семья и единство народов теперь должны быть в каждом фильме, который снимают в России на средства бюджета «Фонд кино» опубликовал методичку с духовно-нравственными ценностями из 17 наименований. Среди них: патриотизм, коллективизм, крепкая семья, единство народов России, служение отечеству и другие ценности Отлично!!! В правильном направление двигаемся

🤪3🤯3

2 Apr 2026, 04:05 UTC≈24,600 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сложно стало в тележку заходить. ВПН работают значительно хуже. Прокси тоже сложно коннектятся. Не знаю как оно будет дальше, но уже чувствуется отторжение от использования каких-то костылей для входа в мессенджер. Ркн молодцы, с задачей справляются успешно. Надоело мучится с входом. Поэтому просто не захожу, и не буду заходить. Я пишу этот пост, просто потому, что хочу вас поблагодарить и попрощаться. Было круто

10🤡10🙏4💔2😍2😭2

30 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,400 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Запрет на продажу вейпов начнётся уже в следующем году Что произошло: — Сегодня Правкомиссия одобрила поправки ко второму чтению законопроекта о лицензировании оборота табака и вейпов — Теперь регионы будут иметь право в экспериментальном режиме запрещать розничную продажу вейпов — Экспериментальный режим продлится с 1 марта 2027 года по 1 марта 2032 года — В регионах, где не будет вводиться запрет, будет дейс

3💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Likopaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,415 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Likopaz” (@Likopaz), 219 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Likopaz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.