Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки Эпштейна

Channel

Записки Эпштейна

@life_in_live_real

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98,881subscribers

-5,264 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002171629465
TypeChannel
Username@life_in_live_real
DescriptionНовости раньше всех! ❗️Администрация не несёт ответственность за рекламу. Будьте внимательны!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/life_in_live_real

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

98,881104,145101,5137 August 2026 — 104,145 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104,145 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104,115 subscribers8 August 2026 — 103,984 subscribers9 August 2026 — 103,881 subscribers10 August 2026 — 103,741 subscribers11 August 2026 — 103,656 subscribers12 August 2026 — 103,538 subscribers14 August 2026 — 103,372 subscribers15 August 2026 — 103,110 subscribers16 August 2026 — 102,908 subscribers17 August 2026 — 102,780 subscribers18 August 2026 — 102,698 subscribers19 August 2026 — 102,540 subscribers20 August 2026 — 102,426 subscribers22 August 2026 — 102,262 subscribers24 August 2026 — 102,087 subscribers25 August 2026 — 101,843 subscribers26 August 2026 — 101,704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 101,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 101,491 subscribers29 August 2026 — 101,360 subscribers30 August 2026 — 101,274 subscribers31 August 2026 — 101,064 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100,928 subscribers2 September 2026 — 100,824 subscribers3 September 2026 — 100,635 subscribers5 September 2026 — 100,473 subscribers8 September 2026 — 100,107 subscribers11 September 2026 — 99,859 subscribers13 September 2026 — 99,579 subscribers14 September 2026 — 99,370 subscribers16 September 2026 — 99,180 subscribers19 September 2026 — 98,881 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -5,264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98,091–104,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:1798,881-299
16 Sept 2026, 16:3699,180-190
14 Sept 2026, 20:0199,370-209
13 Sept 2026, 05:0099,579-280
11 Sept 2026, 07:3799,859-248
8 Sept 2026, 12:35100,107-366
5 Sept 2026, 06:55100,473-162
3 Sept 2026, 09:58100,635-189
2 Sept 2026, 00:39100,824-104
1 Sept 2026, 02:37100,928-136
31 Aug 2026, 05:37101,064-210
30 Aug 2026, 03:16101,274-86
29 Aug 2026, 04:58101,360-131
28 Aug 2026, 02:34101,491-67
27 Aug 2026, 03:02101,558-146
26 Aug 2026, 04:12101,704-139
25 Aug 2026, 05:45101,843-244
24 Aug 2026, 04:04102,087-175
22 Aug 2026, 09:53102,262-164
20 Aug 2026, 21:24102,426first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.29%
avg views ÷ 98,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.892%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held33 (8 April 202617 September 2026)
Views total15,365
Reactions total122
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 22:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
177
Videos
36
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 23s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,560 reactions across 32 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡36723.5%
👍33321.3%
👎27517.6%
21513.8%
💩865.51%
🤣795.06%
💯503.21%
🔥322.05%
🖕171.09%
🗿150.962%
🌚140.897%
😱130.833%
🤮120.769%
😁110.705%
🤔80.513%
👨‍💻60.385%
💘40.256%
30.192%
👀30.192%
🤪30.192%
8 further kinds140.897%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,560 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @life_in_live_real. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC602 views6 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Про финансы и инвестиции и немного про образование

4🤡2

17 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC626 views5 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Продолжение бреда

🤡32

17 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC660 views3 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Voice message

Всякий бред про доходы, детей, женщин и т.д

🤡2💯1

17 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC696 views21 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Негативные реакции ставят клоуны, которые в жизни боятся что-либо сказать

🤡17👍3🤔1

17 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC683 views32 reactionsread 22 September 2026

И в чем врач не прав? Ты свою женскую функцию не выполняешь и проблемы со здоровьем сами и приходят. Но самое комбо тут в другом. В кабинете у врача сидит и слушает, улыбается, боится что-то сказать, но как вышла за порог заведения, так сразу и пролила яд.

🤡21👎4💩4💯2👍1

17 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC720 views15 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

Россиянок начали уговаривать рожать детей при обращении в больницу. Жительница Новосибирска пришла ко врачу с мигренями, но вместо помощи ей посоветовали «поговорить с Богом» и рожать детей. Иначе проблем со здоровьем станет ещё больше, предупредила врач.

🤡93👎1🖕1🤔1

16 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC828 views6 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @Likopaz

Увидел в интернете следующее: "Жопу мыть надо, если что, каждый день" Это придумали капиталисты! Которым выгодно чтоб вы как можно чаще использовали мыло и воду. А если мыть раз в месяц, сколько денег можно сэкономить? Думайте.

🔥4🍓1💯1

12 Sept 2026, 18:45 UTC≈1,530 views4 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @LikopazVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1🔥1🥰1😱1

11 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @Likopaz

Видели в ВК в новостной ленте ии контент? Кто знает как и где его делают?

8 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈2,190 views9 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @Likopaz

Я знаете о чем думаю. Российские зумеры, это же все те , кто застал технологический и информационный прогресс. И поскольку возможность прокачать мозги, финансы, свои физические способности стало намного проще, то нужно чтоб каждый поголовно начал этим пользоваться. Просто как работает наша психология. Если мы видим богатого человека на красивой ламбе, мы хотим быть тем же богатым человеком на красивой ламбе и т.д Ес

4🤪3👍1💩1

31 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈2,490 views9 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @LikopazVideo

POV: Твой первый день в школе уже завтра🙏 #1сентября #школа #мемы

💩54

30 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈2,650 views12 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @Likopaz

Что посеешь, то и пожнешь. Считаю, что эта цитата заслуживает уверенное лидерство. Она и про любовь, и про бизнес и про жизнь в целом. Не возможно чтобы все было идеально, и не возможно впускать в свою голову только позитивные мысли, но чем сильнее сделан на этом акцент, тем и выше качество. Всем отличного дня, и хорошего настроения!

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @life_in_live_real. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки Эпштейна” (@life_in_live_real), 98,881 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/life_in_live_real.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.